Comparison of Periodized and Non-Periodized Resistance Training on Maximal Strength: A Meta-Analysis

被引:97
|
作者
Williams, Tyler D. [1 ,2 ]
Tolusso, Danilo V. [1 ]
Fedewa, Michael V. [1 ]
Esco, Michael R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alabama, Dept Kinesiol, 1013 Moore Hall,Box 870312, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487 USA
[2] Samford Univ, Dept Kinesiol, 800 Lakeshore Dr, Birmingham, AL 35229 USA
关键词
FILE-DRAWER PROBLEM; MUSCLE STRENGTH; MUSCULAR ADAPTATIONS; SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS; EQUATED VOLUME; DOSE-RESPONSE; MULTIPLE SETS; MANIPULATING VOLUME; BODY STRENGTH; INTENSITY;
D O I
10.1007/s40279-017-0734-y
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
Background Periodization is a logical method of organizing training into sequential phases and cyclical time periods in order to increase the potential for achieving specific performance goals while minimizing the potential for overtraining. Periodized resistance training plans are proposed to be superior to non-periodized training plans for enhancing maximal strength. Objective The primary aim of this study was to examine the previous literature comparing periodized resistance training plans to non-periodized resistance training plans and determine a quantitative estimate of effect on maximal strength. Methods All studies included in the meta-analysis met the following inclusion criteria: (1) peer-reviewed publication; (2) published in English; (3) comparison of a periodized resistance training group to a non-periodized resistance training group; (4) maximal strength measured by 1-repetition maximum (1RM) squat, bench press, or leg press. Data were extracted and independently coded by two authors. Random-effects models were used to aggregate a mean effect size (ES), 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and potential moderators. Results The cumulative results of 81 effects gathered from 18 studies published between 1988 and 2015 indicated that the magnitude of improvement in 1RM following periodized resistance training was greater than non-periodized resistance training (ES = 0.43, 95% CI 0.27-0.58; P < 0.001). Periodization model (beta = 0.51; P = 0.0010), training status (beta = -0.59; P = 0.0305), study length (beta = 0.03; P = 0.0067), and training frequency (beta = 0.46; P = 0.0123) were associated with a change in 1RM. These results indicate that undulating programs were more favorable for strength gains. Improvements in 1RM were greater among untrained participants. Additionally, higher training frequency and longer study length were associated with larger improvements in 1RM. Conclusion These results suggest that periodized resistance training plans have a moderate effect on 1RM compared to non-periodized training plans. Variation in training stimuli appears to be vital for increasing maximal strength, and longer periods of higher training frequency may be preferred.
引用
收藏
页码:2083 / 2100
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of Periodized and Non-Periodized Resistance Training on Maximal Strength: A Meta-Analysis
    Tyler D. Williams
    Danilo V. Tolusso
    Michael V. Fedewa
    Michael R. Esco
    Sports Medicine, 2017, 47 : 2083 - 2100
  • [2] Comment on: “Comparison of Periodized and Non-Periodized Resistance Training on Maximal Strength: A Meta-Analysis”
    João Pedro Nunes
    Alex S. Ribeiro
    Brad J. Schoenfeld
    Edilson S. Cyrino
    Sports Medicine, 2018, 48 : 491 - 494
  • [3] Comment on: "Comparison of Periodized and Non-Periodized Resistance Training on Maximal Strength: A Meta-Analysis''
    Nunes, Joao Pedro
    Ribeiro, Alex S.
    Schoenfeld, Brad J.
    Cyrino, Edilson S.
    SPORTS MEDICINE, 2018, 48 (02) : 491 - 494
  • [4] Author’s Reply to Nunes et al.: Comment on: “Comparison of Periodized and Non-Periodized Resistance Training on Maximal Strength: A Meta-Analysis”
    Tyler D. Williams
    Danilo V. Tolusso
    Michael V. Fedewa
    Michael R. Esco
    Sports Medicine, 2018, 48 : 495 - 496
  • [5] Author's Reply to Nunes et al.: Comment on: "Comparison of Periodized and Non-Periodized Resistance Training on Maximal Strength: A Meta-Analysis''
    Williams, Tyler D.
    Tolusso, Danilo V.
    Fedewa, Michael V.
    Esco, Michael R.
    SPORTS MEDICINE, 2018, 48 (02) : 495 - 496
  • [6] Periodized versus Non-periodized Stretch Training on Gymnasts Flexibility and Performance
    Lima, Camila D.
    Brown, Lee E.
    Li, Yimeng
    Herat, Nehara
    Behm, David
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2019, 40 (12) : 779 - 788
  • [7] Non-periodized and Daily Undulating Periodized Resistance Training on Blood Pressure of Older Women
    Coelho-Junior, Hello J.
    Goncalves, Ivan de Oliveira
    Camara, Niels O. S.
    Cenedeze, Marco A.
    Bacurau, Reury F.
    Asano, Ricardo Yukio
    Santana, Jeferson
    Caperuto, Erico
    Uchida, Marco C.
    Rodrigues, Bruno
    FRONTIERS IN PHYSIOLOGY, 2018, 9
  • [8] Early Adaptations to Six Weeks of Non-Periodized and Periodized Strength Training Regimens in Recreational Males
    Souza, Eduardo O.
    Ugrinowitsch, Carlos
    Tricoli, Valmor
    Roschel, Hamilton
    Lowery, Ryan P.
    Aihara, Andre Y.
    Leao, Alberto R. S.
    Wilson, Jacob M.
    JOURNAL OF SPORTS SCIENCE AND MEDICINE, 2014, 13 (03) : 604 - 609
  • [9] Periodized and non-periodized resistance training programs on body composition and physical function of older women
    Coelho-Junior, Helio Jose
    Goncalvez, Ivan de Oliveira
    Carvalho Sampaio, Ricardo Aurelio
    Sewo Sampaio, Priscila Yukari
    Cadore, Eduardo Lusa
    Izquierdo, Mikel
    Marzetti, Emanuele
    Uchida, Marco Carlos
    EXPERIMENTAL GERONTOLOGY, 2019, 121 : 10 - 18
  • [10] Periodized training achieves better autonomic modulation and aerobic performance than non-periodized training
    Clemente-Suarez, Vicente J.
    JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE AND PHYSICAL FITNESS, 2018, 58 (11): : 1559 - 1564