Forcing technological change: A case of automobile emissions control technology development in the US

被引:79
作者
Lee, Jaegul [1 ]
Veloso, Francisco M. [2 ]
Hounshell, David A. [3 ]
Rubin, Edward S. [2 ]
机构
[1] Wayne State Univ, Sch Business Adm, Detroit, MI 48202 USA
[2] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Dept Engn & Publ Policy, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[3] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Dept Social & Decis Sci, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 美国安德鲁·梅隆基金会;
关键词
Technology policy; Auto industry; Sources of innovation; Learning; Patent; CLEAN-AIR ACT; INFORMATION-PROCESSING VIEW; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; ACADEMIC RESEARCH; INTERORGANIZATIONAL RELATIONSHIPS; ENVIRONMENTAL-REGULATION; PERFORMANCE STANDARDS; REGULATORY STANDARDS; TECHNICAL ADVANCE; CHAIN MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.technovation.2009.12.003
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
This article investigates how regulated automakers and upstream component suppliers comply with "technology-forcing" regulations, or laws that set performance standards beyond their usual technological capabilities. In particular, this article examines how firms manage and organize their research and development (R&D) processes concerning automobile emissions control technologies amid the uncertainties resulting from the issuance of new regulations This study involves the analyses of patents, interviews with experts, references to technical papers published for conferences of the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE), and use of learning curves The results of this study show that the high regulatory standards under the technology-forcing regulation played an important role in forcing technological innovations and determining subsequent direction of technological change Component suppliers were important sources of innovation in the 1970s, but over the course of technological evolution, automakers gradually emerged as the locus of innovation This study also shows that firms strategically manage architectural and component knowledge in the presence of uncertainties about their technological capacity to meet new auto emissions control standards (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:249 / 264
页数:16
相关论文
共 86 条
[1]   Putting patents in context: Exploring knowledge transfer from MIT [J].
Agrawal, A ;
Henderson, R .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2002, 48 (01) :44-60
[2]  
[Anonymous], STRATEGY SYSTEMS SCO
[3]  
[Anonymous], RES POLICY
[4]  
[Anonymous], EVALUATING COSTS COM
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1962, Uncertainty and structure as psychological concepts
[6]  
Argote L., 1999, ORG LEARNING CREATIN, DOI 10.1111/j.1552-6909.1999.tb01970.x
[7]  
ASHFORD NA, 1985, HARVARD ENVIRON LAW, V9, P419
[8]   Incentives for technological development: BAT is bad [J].
Bansal, S ;
Gangopadhyay, S .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2005, 30 (03) :345-367
[9]   Future US motor vehicle emission standards and the role of advanced emission control technology in meeting those standards [J].
Bertelsen, BI .
TOPICS IN CATALYSIS, 2001, 16 (1-4) :15-22
[10]   THE NONPECUNIARY COSTS OF AUTOMOBILE EMISSIONS STANDARDS [J].
BRESNAHAN, TF ;
YAO, DA .
RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1985, 16 (04) :437-455