Market Power Mitigation Clearing Mechanism Based on Constrained Bidding Capacities

被引:31
作者
Guo, Hongye [1 ]
Chen, Qixin [1 ]
Xia, Qing [1 ]
Kang, Chongqing [1 ]
机构
[1] Tsinghua Univ, State Key Lab Power Syst, Dept Elect Engn, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Market power mitigation; mechanism design; electricity market; mathematical problem with equilibrium constraints (MPEC); ELECTRICITY MARKETS; EMPIRICAL-ANALYSIS; ENGLAND; WALES; POOL;
D O I
10.1109/TPWRS.2019.2913334
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Market power has been a problematic issue for fair and transparent trades in various electricity markets. To deal with the problems of existing market power mitigation methods, such as complicated judgment criteria, excessive supervision probability, impersonal cost data accounting, and the requirements on perfect information circumstances, a novel spot market power mitigation clearing mechanism (MPMCM) is proposed, which manages to limit potential market power execution while avoiding overregulation and maintaining a real market supply-demand situation. The MPMCM consists of three processes, namely, market power evaluation, bidding capacity division, and bidding capacity constraint. The MPMCM is transformed into a set of bidding constraints and properly integrated in the common market clearing procedure. A bilevel mathematical problem with equilibrium constraints market equilibrium model is proposed to formulate the MPMCM for market simulation, and the mixed integer linear problem reformulation of the bilevel model is derived. Finally, an illustrative example is proposed to observe the strategic behaviors under various situations, thereby proving the validity and effectiveness of the MPMCM. A large-scale numerical example based on a modified IEEE 200-node system is proposed to prove the adaptivity of the MPMCM.
引用
收藏
页码:4817 / 4827
页数:11
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] Capacity Withholding Constrained by Operational Limits of Generation Under Financial Virtual Divestiture in a Day-Ahead Market
    Ameri, Massoud
    Rahimiyan, Morteza
    Latify, Mohammad Amin
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2018, 33 (01) : 771 - 780
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2002, J. Energy Lit
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2017, 14 INT C EUR EN MARK, DOI DOI 10.1109/EEM.2017.7982010
  • [4] Grid Structural Characteristics as Validation Criteria for Synthetic Networks
    Birchfield, Adam B.
    Xu, Ti
    Gegner, Kathleen M.
    Shetye, Komal S.
    Overbye, Thomas J.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2017, 32 (04) : 3258 - 3265
  • [5] An empirical analysis of the potential for market power in California's electricity industry
    Borenstein, S
    Bushnell, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS, 1999, 47 (03) : 285 - 323
  • [6] Measuring market inefficiencies in California's restructured wholesale electricity market
    Borenstein, S
    Bushnell, JB
    Wolak, FA
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2002, 92 (05) : 1376 - 1405
  • [7] Borenstein S., 1997, 6293 NBER
  • [8] A Unifying Market Power Measure for Deregulated Transmission-Constrained Electricity Markets
    Bose, Subhonmesh
    Wu, Chenye
    Xu, Yunjian
    Wierman, Adam
    Mohsenian-Rad, Hamed
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2015, 30 (05) : 2338 - 2348
  • [9] Bushnell J., 2013, ER12423000 ISO MARK
  • [10] The New Electricity Market of Singapore: Regulatory framework, market power and competition
    Chang, Youngho
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2007, 35 (01) : 403 - 412