Cochlear Implantation Improves Both Speech Perception and Patient-Reported Outcomes: A Prospective Follow-Up Study of Treatment Benefits among Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients

被引:7
作者
Rasmussen, Kasper Moller Boje [1 ,2 ]
West, Niels Cramer [1 ,2 ]
Bille, Michael [1 ]
Sandvej, Matilde Gronborg [1 ]
Caye-Thomasen, Per [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Copenhagen, Dept Otorhinolaryngol Head & Neck Surg & Audiol, Rigshosp, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
[2] Univ Copenhagen, Fac Hlth & Med Sci, DK-2200 Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
treatment; hearing rehabilitation; hearing loss; outcome; patient-reported outcome measures; PROM; cochlear implant; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; HEARING PERFORMANCE; TINNITUS; IMPACT; METAANALYSIS; NOISE;
D O I
10.3390/jcm11082257
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Cochlear implantation is considered the best treatment option for patients with severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss for whom conventional hearing aids are insufficient. We used a repeated measures longitudinal approach to evaluate speech recognition and patient-reported outcomes after cochlear implantation in an unbiased cohort of Danish adult patients in a prospective cohort study. We assessed 39 recipients before and two times after implantation using a battery of tests that included Dantale I, the Danish Hearing in Noise Test, the Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire, and the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale. The study group improved significantly on all outcome measures following implantation. On average, Dantale I scores improved by 29 percentage points and Hearing in Noise Test scores improved by 22 percentage points. Most notably, the average Dantale score improved from 26 to 70% in the CI in quiet condition and from 12 to 42% in the cochlear implantation in noise condition when tested monaurally. Dantale demonstrated a significant positive correlation with Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire and Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale scores, while Hearing in Noise Test had no significant correlation with the patient-reported outcome measures. Patients improved significantly at 4 months and marginally improved further at 14 months, indicating that they were approaching a plateau. Our study's use of audiometric and patient-reported outcome measures provides evidence of the treatment benefits of cochlear implantation in adults, which may help physicians advise patients on treatment decisions and align treatment benefit expectations, as well as serve as a foundation for the development of new cochlear implantation selection criteria.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] Cochlear implantation outcomes in adults: A scoping review
    Boisvert, Isabelle
    Reis, Mariana
    Au, Agnes
    Cowan, Robert
    Dowell, Richard C.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (05):
  • [2] Assessment of Speech Understanding After Cochlear Implantation in Adult Hearing Aid Users: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial
    Buchman, Craig A.
    Herzog, Jacques A.
    McJunkin, Jonathan L.
    Wick, Cameron C.
    Durakovic, Nedim
    Firszt, Jill B.
    Kallogjeri, Dorina
    [J]. JAMA OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2020, 146 (10) : 916 - 924
  • [3] The Effects of Cochlear Implantation on Speech Perception in Older Adults
    Budenz, Cameron L.
    Cosetti, Maura K.
    Coelho, Daniel H.
    Birenbaum, Brad
    Babb, James
    Waltzman, Susan B.
    Roehm, Pamela C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2011, 59 (03) : 446 - 453
  • [4] Cochlear Implantation: Current and Future Device Options
    Carlson, Matthew L.
    Driscoll, Colin L. W.
    Gifford, Rene H.
    McMenomey, Sean O.
    [J]. OTOLARYNGOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2012, 45 (01) : 221 - +
  • [5] Long-Term Use of Cochlear Implants in Older Adults: Results From a Large Consecutive Case Series
    Choi, Janet S.
    Contrera, Kevin J.
    Betz, Joshua F.
    Blake, Caitlin R.
    Niparko, John K.
    Lin, Frank R.
    [J]. OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2014, 35 (05) : 815 - 820
  • [6] Quality of life in hearing-impaired adults: The role of cochlear implants and hearing aids
    Cohen, SM
    Labadie, RF
    Dietrich, MS
    Haynes, DS
    [J]. OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2004, 131 (04) : 413 - 422
  • [7] Change in Loneliness After Intervention With Cochlear Implants or Hearing Aids
    Contrera, Kevin J.
    Sung, Yoon K.
    Betz, Joshua
    Li, Lingsheng
    Lin, Frank R.
    [J]. LARYNGOSCOPE, 2017, 127 (08) : 1885 - 1889
  • [8] Corp I.B.M., 2017, IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 25.0
  • [9] Performance Plateau in Prelingually and Postlingually Deafened Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients
    Cusumano, Cristen
    Friedmann, David R.
    Fang, Yixin
    Wang, Binhuan
    Roland, J. Thomas, Jr.
    Waltzman, Susan B.
    [J]. OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2017, 38 (03) : 334 - 338
  • [10] Cochlear implantation and quality of life in postlingually deaf adults: Long-term follow-up
    Damen, Godelieve W. J. A.
    Beynon, Andy J.
    Krabbe, Paul F. M.
    Mulder, Jef J. S.
    Mylanus, Emmanuel A. M.
    [J]. OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2007, 136 (04) : 597 - 604