Access to Justice as a Form of Inequality

被引：3

作者：

Oleinik, Anton ^{[1
,2
]}

机构：

[1] Mem Univ Newfoundland, St John, NF, Canada

[2] Russian Acad Sci, Cent Econ & Math Inst, Moscow, Russia

来源：

JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ISSUES | 2014年 / 48卷 / 02期

关键词：

domination; justice system; power triad; LEGAL-AID; REFORM;

D O I：

10.2753/JEI0021-3624480214

中图分类号：

F [经济];

学科分类号：

02 ;

摘要：

The article discusses three approaches to the issue of access to justice: the neoclassical economic theory, critical sociology, and the concept of power triad. Economic approaches highlight the most visible aspect of the problem: namely, inflated legal fees. Critical sociology focuses on the symbolic power of labeling. The concept of power triad serves to explain the problematic access to justice in terms of a particular technique of domination - access control.

引用

页码：405 / 412

页数：8

共 20 条

[1] What B would otherwise do:: A critique of conceptualizations of 'power' in organizational theory
Ailon, Galit
[J]. ORGANIZATION, 2006, 13 (06) : 771 - 800
[2] Anderson MJ, 2009, RUTGERS LAW REV, V61, P1011
[3] [Anonymous], 1985, SSRN Scholarly Paper 1496720
[4] [Anonymous], OTHER PATH EC ANSWER
[5] [Anonymous], WHAT DOES IT COST AC
[6] Baumgartner SP, 2011, CORNELL INT LAW J, V44, P441
[7] Beetham D., 1991, LEGITIMATION POWER
[8] BOURDIEU P, 1987, HASTINGS LAW J, V38, P805
[9] Commons John R., 1959, The Legal Foundations of Capitalism
[10] Eggertsson T., 1990, EC BEHAV I

← 1 2 →