Modified gemcitabine and oxaliplatin or gemcitabine plus cisplatin in unresectable gallbladder cancer: Results of a phase III randomised controlled trial

被引:55
作者
Sharma, Atul [1 ]
Mohanti, Bidhu Kalyan [2 ]
Chaudhary, Surendra Pal [1 ]
Sreenivas, V. [3 ]
Sahoo, Ranjit Kumar [1 ]
Shukla, Nootan Kumar [4 ]
Thulkar, Sanjay [5 ]
Pal, Sujoy [6 ]
Deo, Surya V. [4 ]
Pathy, Sushmita [2 ]
Dash, Nihar Ranjan [6 ]
Kumar, Sunil [4 ]
Bhatnagar, Sushma [7 ]
Kumar, Rakesh [8 ]
Mishra, Seema [8 ]
Sahni, Peush [6 ]
Iyer, Venkateswaran K. [9 ]
Raina, Vinod [1 ]
机构
[1] AIIMS, Dept Med Oncol, Dr BRA IRCH, New Delhi 110029, India
[2] AIIMS, Dept Radiat Oncol, Dr BRA IRCH, New Delhi 110029, India
[3] AIIMS, Dept Biostat, New Delhi 110029, India
[4] AIIMS, Dept Surg Oncol, Dr BRA IRCH, New Delhi 110029, India
[5] AIIMS, Dept Radio Diag, Dr BRA IRCH, New Delhi 110029, India
[6] AIIMS, Dept Gastrointestinal Surg & Liver Transplantat, New Delhi 110029, India
[7] AIIMS, Dr BRA IRCH, Dept Oncoanaesthesia & Palliat Med, New Delhi 110029, India
[8] AIIMS, Dept Nucl Med, New Delhi 110029, India
[9] AIIMS, Dept Pathol, New Delhi 110029, India
关键词
Gallbladder cancer; Gemcitabine; Oxaliplatin; Cisplatin; Equivalence; GALL-BLADDER CANCER; CHEMOTHERAPY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejca.2019.10.004
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Aim: To determine equivalence of modified gemcitabine and oxaliplatin compared with gemcitabine and cisplatin in unresectable gallbladder cancer (GBC). Primary end-point was overall survival (OS). Methods: Open label, prospective, randomised phase III equivalence study. Inclusion criteria included histologically proven unresectable GBC, 18 years or older, adequate organ functions and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group <= 2. Sample size: 108 patients were required in each arm to have an equivalence margin of +/- 2 months with power of 80%. Treatment: Modified gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (mGemOx)-gemcitabine 900 mg/m2, oxaliplatin 80 mg/m2, maximum 6 cycles; gemcitabine + cisplatin (CisGem)-gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2, cisplatin 25 mg/m2, maximum 8 cycles, all day 1 and 8 every 3 weeks. Results: Two hundred sixty subjects were recruited between February 2011 and July 2015. Two hundred forty-three patients (119, mGemOx and 124, CisGem) received at least 1 dose and analysed for safety and efficacy (modified intention to treat). Median OS was 8.5 months for whole group (95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.9-9.1). Median OS in mGemOx was 9 months and 8.3 months in CisGem; p = 0.057 (hazard ratio = 0.78; 95% CI = 0.60-1.02). Restricted mean OS for follow-up limited to 30 months was 11.2 months (95% CI: 9.8-12.6) in mGemOx and 10.4 months (95% CI: 9.1-11.7) in CisGem. Difference of the mean was 0.8 months with 95% CI, exceeding 2 months (-1.1 to 2.7), hence rejecting equivalence. Peripheral neuropathy, thrombocytopaenia in mGemOx and nephrotoxicity was higher with CisGem. Conclusion: This trial failed to show equivalence of eight cycles of CisGem to six cycles of mGemOx. Numerically OS was better with mGemOx. Toxicities were different. The trial was not powered to answer superiority. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:162 / 170
页数:9
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]   Gemcitabine combined with oxaliplatin (GEMOX) in advanced biliary tract adenocarcinoma:: a GERCOR study [J].
André, T ;
Tournigand, C ;
Rosmorduc, O ;
Provent, S ;
Maindrault-Goebel, F ;
Avenin, D ;
Selle, F ;
Paye, F ;
Hannoun, L ;
Houry, S ;
Gayet, B ;
Lotz, JP ;
de Gramont, A ;
Louvet, C .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2004, 15 (09) :1339-1343
[2]   Cisplatin/gemcitabine or oxaliplatin/gemcitabine in the treatment of advanced biliary tract cancer: a systematic review [J].
Fiteni, Frederic ;
Nguyen, Thierry ;
Vernerey, Dewi ;
Paillard, Marie-Justine ;
Kim, Stefano ;
Demarchi, Martin ;
Fein, Francine ;
Borg, Christophe ;
Bonnetain, Franck ;
Pivot, Xavier .
CANCER MEDICINE, 2014, 3 (06) :1502-1511
[3]   Analyzing survival curves at a fixed point in time [J].
Klein, John P. ;
Logan, Brent ;
Harhoff, Mette ;
Andersen, Per Kragh .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2007, 26 (24) :4505-4519
[4]   Treatment of advanced Gall bladder cancer in the real world-can continuation chemotherapy improve outcomes? [J].
Ostwal, Vikas ;
Pinninti, Rakesh ;
Ramaswamy, Anant ;
Shetty, Nitin ;
Goel, Mahesh ;
Patkar, Shraddha ;
Mirani, Jimmy ;
Nashikkar, Chaitali ;
Banavali, Shripad .
JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 8 (02) :368-376
[5]   Gemcitabine-cisplatin versus gemcitabine-oxaliplatin doublet chemotherapy in advanced gallbladder cancers: a match pair analysis [J].
Ramaswamy, Anant ;
Ostwal, Vikas ;
Pinninti, Rakesh ;
Kannan, Sadhana ;
Bhargava, Prabhat ;
Nashikkar, Chaitali ;
Mirani, Jimmy ;
Banavali, Shripad .
JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES, 2017, 24 (05) :262-267
[6]   The use of restricted mean survival time to estimate the treatment effect in randomized clinical trials when the proportional hazards assumption is in doubt [J].
Royston, Patrick ;
Parmar, Mahesh K. B. .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2011, 30 (19) :2409-2421
[7]  
Sharma Atul, 2010, Trop Gastroenterol, V31, P127
[8]   Best Supportive Care Compared With Chemotherapy for Unresectable Gall Bladder Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Study [J].
Sharma, Atul ;
Dwary, Amit Dutt ;
Mohanti, Bidhu Kalyan ;
Deo, Surya V. ;
Pal, Sujoy ;
Sreenivas, Vishnu ;
Raina, Vinod ;
Shukla, Nootan Kumar ;
Thulkar, Sanjay ;
Garg, Pramod ;
Chaudhary, Surendra Pal .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 28 (30) :4581-4586
[9]  
Shein Chung Chow, 2008, SAMPLE SIZE CALCULAT, P169
[10]   Cisplatin plus Gemcitabine versus Gemcitabine for Biliary Tract Cancer. [J].
Valle, Juan ;
Wasan, Harpreet ;
Palmer, Daniel H. ;
Cunningham, David ;
Anthoney, Alan ;
Maraveyas, Anthony ;
Madhusudan, Srinivasan ;
Iveson, Tim ;
Hughes, Sharon ;
Pereira, Stephen P. ;
Roughton, Michael ;
Bridgewater, John .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2010, 362 (14) :1273-1281