A framework for understanding the quality of evidence use in education

被引:11
作者
Rickinson, Mark [1 ]
Cirkony, Connie [1 ]
Walsh, Lucas [1 ]
Gleeson, Joanne [1 ]
Cutler, Blake [1 ]
Salisbury, Mandy [1 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Fac Educ, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
Evidence use; research use; evidence-informed practice; evidence-based practice; education; schools; SOCIAL-WORK; POLICY;
D O I
10.1080/00131881.2022.2054452
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Background There are growing expectations internationally that schools and systems will use research evidence to inform their improvement efforts. Such developments raise important questions about what it means to use research evidence well in education. Purpose To date, there has been wide-ranging debate about what counts as quality evidence, but very little dialogue about what counts as quality use. In response, this article presents a conceptual framework to define and elaborate what quality use of research evidence might mean in relation to education. Method The framework is informed by a cross-sector systematic review and narrative synthesis of 112 relevant publications from four sectors: health, social care, education and policy. The review explored if, and how, quality of evidence use had been defined and described within each of these sectors in order to inform a quality use framework for education. Findings Based on the cross-sector review, quality use of research evidence is framed in terms of two core components: (1) appropriate research evidence and (2) thoughtful engagement and implementation, supported by three individual enabling components (skillsets, mindsets and relationships) and three organisational enabling components (leadership, culture and infrastructure), as well as system-level influences. Conclusions There is potential for this framework to inform current approaches to the use of research in education. There is also an important need to test and refine its components through further empirical investigation, theoretical inquiry and intervention development.
引用
收藏
页码:133 / 158
页数:26
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]  
Adams S., 2013, RES ADV PRACTICE NUR, P321
[2]   Evidence, policy and guidance for practice: a critical reflection on the case of social housing landlords and antisocial behaviour in Scotland [J].
Anderson, Isobel .
EVIDENCE & POLICY, 2011, 7 (01) :41-58
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2007, EVIDENCE ED LINKING
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2003, RES ENGAGED SCH FORU
[5]   Ways of Understanding Evidence-Based Practice in Social Work: A Qualitative Study [J].
Avby, Gunilla ;
Nilsen, Per ;
Dahlgren, Madeleine Abrandt .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WORK, 2014, 44 (06) :1366-1383
[6]  
Bannigan K., 2007, CONT ISSUES OCCUPATI, P189
[7]   Implementing Evidence-Based Practice Education in Social Work: A Transdisciplinary Approach [J].
Bellamy, Jennifer L. ;
Mullen, Edward J. ;
Satterfield, Jason M. ;
Newhouse, Robin P. ;
Ferguson, Molly ;
Brownson, Ross C. ;
Spring, Bonnie .
RESEARCH ON SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE, 2013, 23 (04) :426-436
[8]  
BERA, 2014, RES TEACH PROF BUILD
[9]  
Boaz A., 2019, What works now? Evidence-informed policy and practice, P369
[10]  
Boaz Annette., 2019, What Works Now? Evidence Informed Policy and Practice