The economic, social and environmental impact of shale gas exploitation in Romania: A cost-benefit analysis

被引:37
作者
Grecu, Eugenia [1 ]
Aceleanu, Mirela Ionela [2 ]
Albulescu, Claudiu Tiberiu [1 ]
机构
[1] Politehn Univ Timisoara, Management Dept, P Ta Victoriei 2, Timisoara 300002, Romania
[2] Bucharest Univ Econ Studies, Dept Econ & Econ Policy, Bucharest, Romania
关键词
Shale gas exploitation; Cost-benefit analysis; Sensitivity analysis; Hydraulic fracturing; Romania; UNITED-KINGDOM; NATURAL-GAS; EXTRACTION; CHINA; FRACKING; CONTEXT; POLAND; POLICY;
D O I
10.1016/j.rser.2018.05.026
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Romania has recently begun the exploration of shale gas reserves and, it is expected that these unconventional resources to be exploited by hydraulic fracturing. The use of this technology is controversial in high-populated areas, where the economic, social and especially the environmental impact is practically unknown. However, for the public opinion, the shale gas exploitation is presented as an operation triggering no major risks. Therefore, several agreements were concluded between the Romanian authorities and the major players in the exploitation field. Against this background, our paper shows that the shale gas exploitation has no real benefits for the Romanian citizens. More precisely, we conduct an exhaustive cost-benefit analysis, considering the economic, social and environmental consequences of the shale gas exploitation, and we show that in the long run, the costs considerably overlap the benefits. The use of hydraulic fracturing procedure, which implies huge costs with the water consumption and wastewater treatment, influences the outcome of our investigation. These findings are sustained by the sensitivity analysis we have performed.
引用
收藏
页码:691 / 700
页数:10
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]   Statistical evaluation of the impact of shale gas activities on ozone pollution in North Texas [J].
Ahmadi, Mahdi ;
John, Kuruvilla .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2015, 536 :457-467
[2]   Exploring support for shale gas extraction in the United Kingdom [J].
Andersson-Hudson, Jessica ;
Knight, William ;
Humphrey, Mathew ;
O'Hara, Sarah .
ENERGY POLICY, 2016, 98 :582-589
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2013, TECHNICALLY RECOVERA
[4]  
[Anonymous], EC IMP SHAL GAS EXPL
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2004, COST BENEFIT ANAL CO
[6]   IMPACTS OF GAS DRILLING ON HUMAN AND ANIMAL HEALTH [J].
Bamberger, Michelle ;
Oswald, Robert E. .
NEW SOLUTIONS-A JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH POLICY, 2012, 22 (01) :51-77
[7]   THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF SHALE GAS DEVELOPMENT ON STATE AND LOCAL ECONOMIES: BENEFITS, COSTS, AND UNCERTAINTIES [J].
Barth, Jannette M. .
NEW SOLUTIONS-A JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH POLICY, 2013, 23 (01) :85-101
[8]   "Fracking" controversy and communication: Using national survey data to understand public perceptions of hydraulic fracturing [J].
Boudet, Hilary ;
Clarke, Christopher ;
Bugden, Dylan ;
Maibach, Edward ;
Roser-Renouf, Connie ;
Leiserowitz, Anthony .
ENERGY POLICY, 2014, 65 :57-67
[9]  
Brash W., 2012, FRACKING PENNSYLVANI
[10]   Ecological Risks of Shale Oil and Gas Development to Wildlife, Aquatic Resources and their Habitats [J].
Brittingham, Margaret C. ;
Maloney, Kelly O. ;
Farag, Aida M. ;
Harper, David D. ;
Bowen, Zachary H. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 48 (19) :11034-11047