Neoadjuvant rectal score as individual-level surrogate for disease-free survival in rectal cancer in the CAO/ARO/AIO-04 randomized phase III trial

被引:71
作者
Fokas, E. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Fietkau, R. [4 ]
Hartmann, A. [5 ]
Hohenberger, W. [6 ]
Gruetzmann, R. [6 ]
Ghadimi, M. [7 ]
Liersch, T. [7 ]
Stroebel, P. [8 ]
Grabenbauer, G. G. [9 ,10 ]
Graeven, U. [11 ]
Hofheinz, R-D [12 ]
Koehne, C-H [13 ]
Wittekind, C. [14 ]
Sauer, R. [4 ,15 ]
Kaufmann, M. [15 ]
Hothorn, T. [15 ]
Roedel, C. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Goethe Univ Frankfurt, Dept Radiotherapy & Oncol, Theodor Stern Kai 7, D-60590 Frankfurt, Germany
[2] German Canc Res Ctr, Heidelberg, Germany
[3] German Canc Consortium DKTK, Partner Site Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
[4] Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, Dept Radiat Therapy, Erlangen, Germany
[5] Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, Inst Pathol, Erlangen, Germany
[6] Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, Dept Gen & Visceral, Erlangen, Germany
[7] Univ Med Ctr Gottingen, Dept Gen Visceral & Pediat Surg, Gottingen, Germany
[8] Univ Med Ctr Gottingen, Inst Pathol, Gottingen, Germany
[9] DiaCura, Dept Radiat Oncol & Radiotherapy, Coburg, Germany
[10] Klinikum Coburg, Coburg, Germany
[11] Kliniken Maria Hilf GmbH Monchengladbach, Dept Hematol Oncol, Monchengladbach, Germany
[12] Univ Hosp Mannheim, Dept Med Oncol, Mannheim, Germany
[13] Carl von Ossietzky Univ Oldenburg, Dept Med Oncol, Oldenburg, Germany
[14] Univ Leipzig, Inst Pathol, Leipzig, Germany
[15] Univ Zurich, Epidemiol Biostat & Prevent Inst, Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
rectal cancer; NAR score; surrogate; DFS; trial; prognosis; END-POINTS; PREOPERATIVE CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; POSTOPERATIVE CHEMOTHERAPY; GERMAN CAO/ARO/AIO-04; TUMOR-REGRESSION; PROSTATE-CANCER; RADIOTHERAPY; THERAPY; FLUOROURACIL; OXALIPLATIN;
D O I
10.1093/annonc/mdy143
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Surrogate end points in rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiation are lacking as their statistical validation poses major challenges, including confirmation based on large phase III trials. We examined the prognostic role and individual-level surrogacy of neoadjuvant rectal (NAR) score that incorporates weighted cT, ypT and ypN categories for disease-free survival (DFS) in 1191 patients with rectal carcinoma treated within the CAO/ARO/AIO-04 phase III trial. Patients and methods: Cox regression models adjusted for treatment arm, resection status, and NAR score were used in multivariable analysis. The four Prentice criteria (PC1-4) were used to assess individual-level surrogacy of NAR for DFS. Results: After a median follow-up of 50 months, the addition of oxaliplatin to fluorouracil-based chemoradiotherapy (CRT) significantly improved 3-year DFS [75.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 72.30% to 79.50%) versus 71.3% (95% CI 67.60% to 74.90%); P = 0.034; PC 1) and resulted in a shift toward lower NAR groups (P = 0.034, PC 2) compared with fluorouracil-only CRT. The 3-year DFS was 91.7% (95% CI 88.2% to 95.2%), 81.8% (95% CI 78.4% to 85.1%), and 58.1% (95% CI 52.4% to 63.9%) for low, intermediate, and high NAR score, respectively (P < 0.001; PC 3). NAR score remained an independent prognostic factor for DFS [low versus high NAR: hazard ratio (HR) 4.670; 95% CI 3.106-7.020; P < 0.001; low versus intermediate NAR: HR 1.971; 95% CI 1.303-2.98; P = 0.001] in multivariable analysis. Notwithstanding the inherent methodological difficulty in interpretation of PC 4 to establish surrogacy, the treatment effect on DFS was captured by NAR, supporting satisfaction of individual-level PC 4. Conclusion: Our study validates the prognostic role and individual-level surrogacy of NAR score for DFS within a large randomized phase III trial. NAR score could help oncologists to speed up response-adapted therapeutic decision, and further large phase III trial data sets should aim to confirm trial-level surrogacy.
引用
收藏
页码:1521 / 1527
页数:7
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
ARMSTRONG DE, 2014, J CLIN ONCOL S, V32
[2]   What is the clinical benefit of preoperative chemoradiotherapy with 5FU/leucovorin for T3-4 rectal cancer in a pooled analysis of EORTC 22921 and FFCD 9203 trials: Surrogacy in question? [J].
Bonnetain, F. ;
Bosset, J. F. ;
Gerard, J. P. ;
Calais, G. ;
Conroy, T. ;
Mineur, L. ;
Bouche, O. ;
Maingon, P. ;
Chapet, O. ;
Radosevic-Jelic, L. ;
Methy, N. ;
Collette, L. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2012, 48 (12) :1781-1790
[3]   Statistical evaluation of surrogate endpoints with examples from cancer clinical trials [J].
Buyse, Marc ;
Molenberghs, Geert ;
Paoletti, Xavier ;
Oba, Koji ;
Alonso, Ariel ;
Van der Elst, Wim ;
Burzykowski, Tomasz .
BIOMETRICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 58 (01) :104-132
[4]   Biomarkers and surrogate end points-the challenge of statistical validation [J].
Buyse, Marc ;
Sargent, Daniel J. ;
Grothey, Axel ;
Matheson, Alastair ;
De Gramont, Aimery .
NATURE REVIEWS CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 7 (06) :309-317
[5]   Pathological grading of regression: an International Study Group perspective [J].
Chetty, Runjan ;
Gill, P. ;
Bateman, Adrian C. ;
Driman, David K. ;
Govender, Dhirendra ;
Bateman, Andrew R. ;
Chua, Y. J. ;
Greywoode, Godman ;
Hemmings, Christine ;
Imat, I. ;
Jaynes, Eleanor ;
Lee, Cheok Soon ;
Locketz, Michael ;
Rowsell, Corwyn ;
Rullier, Anne ;
Serra, Stefano ;
Szentgyorgyi, Eva ;
Vajpeyi, Rajkumar ;
Delaney, David ;
Wang, Lai Mun .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2012, 65 (10) :865-866
[6]   Pathological complete response and long-term clinical benefit in breast cancer: the CTNeoBC pooled analysis [J].
Cortazar, Patricia ;
Zhang, Lijun ;
Untch, Michael ;
Mehta, Keyur ;
Costantino, Joseph P. ;
Wolmark, Norman ;
Bonnefoi, Herve ;
Cameron, David ;
Gianni, Luca ;
Valagussa, Pinuccia ;
Swain, Sandra M. ;
Prowell, Tatiana ;
Loibl, Sibylle ;
Wickerham, D. Lawrence ;
Bogaerts, Jan ;
Baselga, Jose ;
Perou, Charles ;
Blumenthal, Gideon ;
Blohmer, Jens ;
Mamounas, Eleftherios P. ;
Bergh, Jonas ;
Semiglazov, Vladimir ;
Justice, Robert ;
Eidtmann, Holger ;
Paik, Soonmyung ;
Piccart, Martine ;
Sridhara, Rajeshwari ;
Fasching, Peter A. ;
Slaets, Leen ;
Tang, Shenghui ;
Gerber, Bernd ;
Geyer, Charles E., Jr. ;
Pazdur, Richard ;
Ditsch, Nina ;
Rastogi, Priya ;
Eiermann, Wolfgang ;
von Minckwitz, Gunter .
LANCET, 2014, 384 (9938) :164-172
[7]   Safety and tolerability of veliparib combined with capecitabine plus radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer: a phase 1b study [J].
Czito, Brian G. ;
Deming, Dustin A. ;
Jameson, Gayle S. ;
Mulcahy, Mary F. ;
Vaghefi, Houman ;
Dudley, Matthew W. ;
Holen, Kyle D. ;
DeLuca, Angela ;
Mittapalli, Rajendar K. ;
Munasinghe, Wijith ;
He, Lei ;
Zalcberg, John R. ;
Ngan, Samuel Y. ;
Komarnitsky, Philip ;
Michael, Michael .
LANCET GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2017, 2 (06) :418-426
[8]   Surrogate endpoints for prostate cancer-specific mortality after radiotherapy and androgen suppression therapy in men with localised or locally advanced prostate cancer: an analysis of two randomised trials [J].
D'Amico, Anthony V. ;
Chen, Ming-Hui ;
de Castro, Mario ;
Loffredo, Marian ;
Lamb, David S. ;
Steigler, Allison ;
Kantoff, Philip W. ;
Denham, James W. .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2012, 13 (02) :189-195
[9]   Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints in clinical trials [J].
Fleming, Thomas R. ;
Powers, John H. .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2012, 31 (25) :2973-2984
[10]  
Fokas E, 2017, JNCI-J NATL CANCER I, V109, P1