Concordance Between Bone Pathology and Bone Culture for the Diagnosis of Osteomyelitis in the Presence of Charcot Neuro-Osteoarthropathy

被引:11
作者
Elmarsafi, Tammer [1 ]
Kumar, Anagha [1 ]
Cooper, Paul S. [2 ]
Steinberg, John S. [1 ]
Evans, Karen K. [1 ]
Attinger, Christopher E. [1 ]
Kim, Paul J. [1 ]
机构
[1] MedStar Georgetown Univ Hosp, Dept Plast Surg, Washington, DC 20007 USA
[2] MedStar Georgetown Univ Hosp, Dept Orthoped Surg, Washington, DC 20007 USA
关键词
bone culture; bone pathology; Charcot; concordance; diabetes; histopathology; osteomyelitis; DIABETIC FOOT;
D O I
10.1053/j.jfas.2018.03.016
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
The diagnosis of osteomyelitis (OM) is a challenging but critical pathology to uncover in patients with concomitant Charcot neuro-osteoarthropathy (CN). The reference standard to diagnose OM is bone biopsy for histopathologic and microbiologic examination. The presence of CN. however, can have a negative effect on the accuracy of either method to identify OM. The aim of the present study was to examine the concordance between bone pathology and bone cultures in the presence of CN in the diagnosis of OM. A total of 286 patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and CN were identified retrospectively, with 48 patients identified with OM. OM was confirmed by radiographs, magnetic resonance imaging, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and C-reactive protein, positive probe-to-bone test results, and intraoperative inspection. Seventy matched pairs of bone pathology and cultures with complete data were compared and analyzed. Statistical analysis included concordance, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, sensitivity, specificity, and kappa coefficient. Concordance between bone pathology and bone culture was 41.4%, with agreement in 29 of 70 paired specimens. The diagnostic test accuracy of histopathologic examination to diagnose OM in CN bone in our study was 51.4%. The diagnostic test accuracy of microbiologic examination to diagnose OM in CN bone was 50%. The positive predictive value was 72.2%. The negative predictive value was 44.1%. The sensitivity was 57.8%. The specificity was 60.0%. The kappa coefficient was 0.165. The reference standard method of histopathologic and microbiologic examination of bone specimens has little concordance and can lead to inaccurate or inconclusive information. The low sensitivity and specificity demonstrated in the present study does not support the use of the current reference standard method of bone biopsy for histologic and microbiologic diagnosis of OM when CN is present. Thus, a diagnosis of OM in patients with CN should only be considered in the presence of strong clinical, laboratory, and imaging correlates. (C) 2018 by the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:919 / 923
页数:5
相关论文
共 12 条
  • [1] Outcomes of surgical treatment of diabetic foot osteomyelitis:: a series of 185 patients with histopathological confirmation of bone involvement
    Aragon-Sanchez, F. J.
    Cabrera-Galvan, J. J.
    Quintana-Marrero, Y.
    Hernandez-Herrero, M. J.
    Lazaro-Martinez, J. L.
    Garcia-Morales, E.
    Beneit-Montesinos, J. V.
    Armstrong, D. G.
    [J]. DIABETOLOGIA, 2008, 51 (11) : 1962 - 1970
  • [2] Osteomyelitis or Charcot neuroosteoarthropathy? Differentiating these disorders in diabetic patients with a foot problem
    Ertugrul, Bulent M.
    Lipsky, Benjamin A.
    Savk, Oner
    [J]. DIABETIC FOOT & ANKLE, 2013, 4 (01):
  • [3] The diabetic foot: Charcot joint and osteomyelitis
    Giurato, Laura
    Uccioli, Luigi
    [J]. NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS, 2006, 27 (09) : 745 - 749
  • [4] Bacterial osteomyelitis in adults: Evolving considerations in diagnosis and treatment
    Haas, DW
    McAndrew, MP
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 101 (05) : 550 - 561
  • [5] Osteomyelitis
    Lew, DP
    Waldvogel, FA
    [J]. LANCET, 2004, 364 (9431) : 369 - 379
  • [6] Expert opinion on the management of infections in the diabetic foot
    Lipsky, B. A.
    Peters, E. J. G.
    Senneville, E.
    Berendt, A. R.
    Embil, J. M.
    Lavery, L. A.
    Urbancic-Rovan, V.
    Jeffcoate, W. J.
    [J]. DIABETES-METABOLISM RESEARCH AND REVIEWS, 2012, 28 : 163 - 178
  • [7] Bone of contention: Diagnosing diabetic foot osteomyelitis
    Lipsky, Benjamin A.
    [J]. CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2008, 47 (04) : 528 - 530
  • [8] Lipsky BA, 2012, CLIN INFECT DIS, V54, pE132, DOI [10.1093/cid/cis460, 10.1093/cid/cis346]
  • [9] Statistical Reliability of Bone Biopsy for the Diagnosis of Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis
    Meyr, Andrew J.
    Singh, Salil
    Zhang, Xinmin
    Khilko, Natalya
    Mukherjee, Abir
    Sheridan, Michael J.
    Khurana, Jasvir S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FOOT & ANKLE SURGERY, 2011, 50 (06) : 663 - 667
  • [10] The Charcot Foot in Diabetes
    Rogers, Lee C.
    Frykberg, Robert G.
    Armstrong, David G.
    Boulton, Andrew J. M.
    Edmonds, Michael
    Ha Van, Georges
    Hartemann, Agnes
    Game, Frances
    Jefecoate, William
    Jirkovska, Alexandra
    Jude, Edward
    Morbach, Stephan
    Morrison, William B.
    Pinzur, Michael
    Pitocco, Dario
    Sanders, Lee
    Wukich, Dane K.
    Uccioli, Luigi
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 2011, 34 (09) : 2123 - 2129