Evaluation methods and enteric methane mitigation strategies in ruminants

被引:0
作者
Ribeiro Pereira, Luiz Gustavo [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Embrapa Gado Leite, Juiz De Fora, MG, Brazil
[2] Embrapa CAPq FAPEMIG, Projeto Rumen Gases, Brasilia, DF, Brazil
[3] CNPq, Prod, Brasilia, DF, Brazil
关键词
climate change; greenhouse gas; livestock; methane; sustainability;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Latin America livestock industries have been especially criticised because of their large greenhouse gas production as a result of the use of degraded forages and performances below production potential. Agriculture contributes a significant amount of the three main greenhouse gases: methane (CH4), carbon dioxide (CO2) and nitrous oxide (N2O). Methane gas has a global warming potential 25 times greater than CO2. Enteric methane is an important greenhouse gas which is responsible for approximately 15% of global warming. The tendency and legal necessity to mitigate the greenhouse gas emissions is likely to have a direct influence on the increased efficiency of livestock systems, including animal nutrition and handling. The development of mitigation strategies and the viability of the strategies' practical applications are issues that have been researched around the world. There are various nutritional strategies to mitigate enteric methane that have been studied and developed. All of these have different viabilities, costs and possibilities to be accepted by the producers. The choice of which one will be adopted should be based on the capacity to reduce methane emissions associated with economical viability and the maintenance of animal performance. The increase in zootechnial parameters that will be achieved in production systems (mainly the ones related to efficient forage use) associated with good nutritional, health and reproductive management are important strategies to consolidate Brazil as a food producer to the world, respecting the demands related to the land, water, conservation of biodiversity and the emission of greenhouse gases.
引用
收藏
页码:264 / 277
页数:14
相关论文
共 72 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], GREENH GAS AN AGR C
  • [2] [Anonymous], INV BRAS EM REM ANTR
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2009, The State of Food and Agriculture 2009: Livestock in the balance
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1995, CLIMATE CHANGE 1994
  • [5] Comparison of methane production between C3 and C4 grasses and legumes
    Archimede, H.
    Eugene, M.
    Magdeleine, C. Marie
    Boval, M.
    Martin, C.
    Morgavi, D. P.
    Lecomte, P.
    Doreau, M.
    [J]. ANIMAL FEED SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 166-67 : 59 - 64
  • [6] Nutritional management for enteric methane abatement: a review
    Beauchemin, K. A.
    Kreuzer, M.
    O'Mara, F.
    McAllister, T. A.
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL AGRICULTURE, 2008, 48 (1-2) : 21 - 27
  • [7] Beauchemin KA, 2005, J ANIM SCI, V83, P653
  • [8] Effects of genetic line and feeding system on methane emissions from dairy systems
    Bell, M. J.
    Wall, E.
    Simm, G.
    Russell, G.
    [J]. ANIMAL FEED SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 166-67 : 699 - 707
  • [9] Evaluation of dietary strategies to reduce methane production in ruminants: A modelling approach
    Benchaar, C
    Pomar, C
    Chiquette, J
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2001, 81 (04) : 563 - 574
  • [10] Berchielli TT, 2003, REUNIAO ANUAL SOC BR, V40