Mixed Evidence for Interactive Effects of Outgroup Proportions and Intergroup Contact on Racial Bias in the United States

被引:11
作者
Rae, James R. [1 ]
Skinner-Dorkenoo, Allison L. [2 ]
Reiman, Anna-Kaisa [3 ]
Schmid, Katharina [4 ,5 ]
Hewstone, Miles [6 ]
机构
[1] Zillow Res, Seattle, WA 98101 USA
[2] Univ Georgia, Psychol, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[3] SUNY Albany, Psychol, Albany, NY 12222 USA
[4] Univ Ramon Llull, Esade Business Sch, Org Behav, Barcelona, Spain
[5] Univ Ramon Llull, Esade Business Sch, Grp Dynam & Intergrp Relat, Barcelona, Spain
[6] Univ Oxford, Oxford, England
关键词
intergroup contact; conflict theory; intergroup relations; implicit bias; Implicit Association Test; CENTERING PREDICTOR VARIABLES; IMPLICIT ASSOCIATION TEST; PROBING INTERACTIONS; PREJUDICE; ATTITUDES; DIVERSITY; METAANALYSIS; POPULATIONS; REGRESSION; THREAT;
D O I
10.1177/19485506211027756
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Dominant majority-group members living in areas with larger proportions of outgroup members tend to express more ingroup bias. However, prior research has rarely considered this in tandem with the bias-reducing effects of intergroup contact or tested whether outgroup proportions have similar effects for oppressed minority-group members. In two preregistered studies, we tested whether contact moderates the association between outgroup proportions and ingroup bias among White and Black Americans (total N > 75,000). As hypothesized, more Black residents in an area predicted greater explicit (but not implicit) ingroup bias among White respondents who reported low (but not high) contact with Black people. By contrast, more White residents in an area predicted lower explicit (but not implicit) ingroup bias among Black respondents regardless of intergroup contact with White people. We qualify previous findings by demonstrating that the association between outgroup proportions and ingroup bias depends on one's group membership and level of intergroup contact.
引用
收藏
页码:476 / 489
页数:14
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]  
Allport G., 1954, The nature of prejudice
[2]  
[Anonymous], About us
[3]   The Best Way to Measure Explicit Racial Attitudes Is to Ask About Them [J].
Axt, Jordan R. .
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL AND PERSONALITY SCIENCE, 2018, 9 (08) :896-906
[4]   A comparative investigation of seven indirect attitude measures [J].
Bar-Anan, Yoav ;
Nosek, Brian A. .
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2014, 46 (03) :668-688
[5]   The Wallpaper Effect: The Contact Hypothesis Fails for Minority Group Members Who Live in Areas with a High Proportion of Majority Group Members [J].
Barlow, Fiona Kate ;
Hornsey, Matthew J. ;
Thai, Michael ;
Sengupta, Nikhil K. ;
Sibley, Chris G. .
PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (12)
[6]   Probing interactions in fixed and multilevel regression: Inferential and graphical techniques [J].
Bauer, DJ ;
Curran, PJ .
MULTIVARIATE BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, 2005, 40 (03) :373-400
[7]   Does Contact Reduce Prejudice or Does Prejudice Reduce Contact? A Longitudinal Test of the Contact Hypothesis Among Majority and Minority Groups in Three European Countries [J].
Binder, Jens ;
Zagefka, Hanna ;
Brown, Rupert ;
Funke, Friedrich ;
Kessler, Thomas ;
Mummendey, Amelie ;
Maquil, Annemie ;
Demoulin, Stephanie ;
Leyens, Jacques-Philippe .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 96 (04) :843-856
[8]  
Blalock H. M., 1967, THEORY MINORITY GROU
[9]   Centering Predictor Variables in Three-Level Contextual Models [J].
Brincks, Ahnalee M. ;
Enders, Craig K. ;
Llabre, Maria M. ;
Bulotsky-Shearer, Rebecca J. ;
Prado, Guillermo ;
Feaster, Daniel J. .
MULTIVARIATE BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, 2017, 52 (02) :149-163
[10]   An integrative theory of intergroup contact [J].
Brown, R ;
Hewstone, M .
ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 37, 2005, 37 :255-343