Opening up a tailored tutor qualification program for medical students to other healthcare students - a mixed-method study

被引:2
作者
Homberg, A. [1 ]
Ziegler, S. [2 ]
Mahler, C. [3 ]
Schultz, J. H. [4 ]
Loukanova, S. [2 ]
Hundertmark, J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Heidelberg Univ, Med Fac Mannheim, Dept Med Educ Res, Theodor Kutzer Ufer 1-3, D-68176 Mannheim, Germany
[2] Heidelberg Univ Hosp, Dept Gen Practice & Hlth Serv Res, Neuenheimer Feld 130-3, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
[3] Tubingen Univ Hosp, Dept Nursing Sci, Hoppe Seyler Str 9, D-72076 Tubingen, Germany
[4] Heidelberg Univ Hosp, Dept Gen Internal Med & Psychosomat, Neuenheimer Feld 410, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
关键词
Interprofessional education; Peer teaching; Peer-assisted learning; Tutor qualification; Undergraduate education; PEER; EDUCATION; COMMUNICATION; SKILLS; PERFORMANCE; ATTITUDES; TEACHERS;
D O I
10.1186/s12909-022-03304-y
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Background Peer-led tutorials are widely used in medical education to promote practical skills acquisition and support faculty staff. Typically, student tutors are custom trained for this specific task. We investigated whether opening up an existing medical tutor qualification program to other degree programs is successful in terms of acceptance among students, acquisition of tutor-specific and interprofessional competencies, and which factors contribute to success or failure. Methods We developed a two-day tutor qualification program and conducted it annually from 2016 to 2020 with medical and other healthcare students. At the end of each course, we administered a written survey in which the participants rated the following items: their attitudes towards interprofessional learning (using the UWE-IP-D Interprofessional Learning Scale), the interprofessional learning setting, the teaching approach, and their competency acquisition (each on a five-point Likert scale; 1 = strongly agree, 5 = strongly disagree). Furthermore, we assessed participants' qualitative feedback in free-text fields and performed inductive content analyses. Results The study participation rate was high (response rate 97%; medical students: n = 75; healthcare students: n = 22). Participants stated high levels of competency acquisition (total M = 1.59, individual items' M's ranging from 1.20 to 2.05) and even higher satisfaction with the teaching approach (total M = 1.28, individual items' M's ranging from 1.43 to 1.05). Overall satisfaction with the training was M = 1.22; SD = 0.58. No significant differences in ratings were found between the student groups. The qualitative results showed that students appreciated the interprofessional setting and experienced it as enriching. The most positive feedback was found in didactics/teaching methods on role-plays and group work; most suggestions for improvement were found in the area of structure and organisation on breaks and time management. Conclusions Opening up an existing medical tutor qualification program to other student groups can be seen as fruitful to teach not only tutor-related aspects but also interprofessional competencies. The results demonstrate the importance of detailed planning that considers group composition and contextual conditions and provides interactive teaching methods to promote interprofessional experiences. This study offers important information about prerequisites and methodological implementation that could be important for the interprofessional redesign of existing training programs.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 66 条
  • [11] Student teaching: views of student near-peer teachers and learners
    Bulte, Carolien
    Betts, Aaron
    Garner, Kathryn
    Durning, Steven
    [J]. MEDICAL TEACHER, 2007, 29 (06) : 583 - 590
  • [12] "Helping someone with a skill sharpens it in your own mind": a mixed method study exploring health professions students experiences of Peer Assisted Learning (PAL)
    Carr, Sandra E.
    Brand, Gabrielle
    Wei, Li
    Wright, Helen
    Nicol, Pam
    Metcalfe, Helene
    Saunders, Julie
    Payne, John
    Seubert, Liza
    Foley, Laurie
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2016, 16
  • [13] Dandavino M., 2009, TEACH, V29, P565, DOI [10.1080/01421590701477449, DOI 10.1080/01421590701477449]
  • [14] Crucial Conversations: An interprofessional learning opportunity for senior healthcare students
    Delisle, Megan
    Grymonpre, Ruby
    Whitley, Rebecca
    Wirtzfeld, Debrah
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERPROFESSIONAL CARE, 2016, 30 (06) : 777 - 786
  • [15] The effectiveness of team-based learning on learning outcomes in health professions education: BEME Guide No. 30
    Fatmi, Mim
    Hartling, Lisa
    Hillier, Tracey
    Campbell, Sandra
    Oswald, Anna E.
    [J]. MEDICAL TEACHER, 2013, 35 (12) : E1608 - E1624
  • [16] Fellmer-Drug Erika, 2014, GMS Z Med Ausbild, V31, pDoc19, DOI 10.3205/zma000911
  • [17] Gesellschaft fur Medizinische Ausbildung e.V. Stellungnahme des Ausschusses Integrative Medizin und Perspektivenpluralismus, 2019, GMS J MED EDU, P36, DOI [10.3205/zma001254, DOI 10.3205/ZMA001254]
  • [18] PEER TEACHING IN HIGHER-EDUCATION - REVIEW
    GOLDSCHMID, B
    GOLDSCHMID, ML
    [J]. HIGHER EDUCATION, 1976, 5 (01) : 9 - 33
  • [19] HOLM S, 1979, SCAND J STAT, V6, P65
  • [20] Homberg A., 2019, J Interprofess Educ Pract, V17, DOI [10.1016/j.xjep.2019.100272, DOI 10.1016/J.XJEP.2019.100272]