A Systematic Review of Instruments Measuring Family and Social Support of Breastfeeding Mothers

被引:0
|
作者
Babakhanian, Masaudeh [1 ]
Sayar, Soraya [2 ]
Akrami, Faezeh Sadat [3 ]
Ghazanfarpour, Masumeh [4 ]
Kargarfard, Leila [5 ]
Dizavandi, Fatemeh Rajab [6 ]
Khadivzadeh, Talat [6 ]
机构
[1] Semnan Univ Med Sci, Social Determinants Hlth Res Ctr, Behav Sci, Semnan, Iran
[2] Islamic Azad Univ, Dept Social Sci, Tehran North Branch, Sociol, Tehran, Iran
[3] Islamic Azad Univ, Sch Humanities & Social Sci, Sci & Res Branch, Dept Clin Psychol, Tehran, Iran
[4] Kerman Univ Med Sci, Razi Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Dept Midwifery, Kerman, Iran
[5] Shiraz Univ Med Sci, Fatemeh Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Shiraz, Iran
[6] Mashhad Univ Med Sci, Evidence Based Care Res Ctr, Mashhad, Iran
来源
关键词
Adolescents; Aggression; Children; Life Satisfaction; Self-rated Health;
D O I
10.22038/ijp.2018.33521.2959
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Background: Due to the low rate of breastfeeding among working mothers and support of interventions to increase the duration of breastfeeding, this systematic review conducted to evaluate psychometric properties of instruments measured mother's perception of Breastfeeding Support. Materials and Methods: The search was carried in English language databases including Medline (via PubMed), Scopus, Cochran library and Web of Science since inception to March 2018 regarding published studies evaluating the psychometric properties of the Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy. The COSMIN checklist was used to assess the quality of related studies. Results Authors of Perceived Breastfeeding Support Assessment Tool' (PBSAT) suggested that instrument seem to should be two factors "workplace environmental support for breast-feeding working mother" and "the available social environmental support for working mothers". Total Cronbach's alpha was 0.85. In exclusive breastfeeding social support (EBFSS) instrument, based on exploratory factor analysis, 16 items grouped into three factors "instrumental", "emotional" and "informational factors" accounted 66% of total variance. EFA were followed by confirmatory factors analysis showed Modified model was partially fitted to the data. In the Workplace Breastfeeding Support Scale (WBSS), EFA identified four dimensions of breastfeeding support at workplace. These four factors labeled "technical support", "breastfeeding-friendly environment", "facility support" and "peer support". Cronbach's alpha was 0.77 and split-half reliability was r= 0.86. In Employee Perceptions of Breastfeeding Support Questionnaire (EPBS-Q), data scaled by the Multidimensional Random Coefficients Multinomial Logit Model. A two-dimensional model (company polices/work culture and manager and her co-workers) were emerged. Cronbach's alpha was excellent (almost 0.90). Conclusion: Four instruments found to assess breastfeeding was valid and reliable to measure breast feeding in social and workplaces.
引用
收藏
页码:8821 / 8829
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Critical Review of Instruments Measuring Breastfeeding Attitudes, Knowledge, and Social Support
    Casal, Corrine S.
    Lei, Ann
    Young, Sera L.
    Tuthill, Emily L.
    JOURNAL OF HUMAN LACTATION, 2017, 33 (01) : 20 - 47
  • [2] Support for breastfeeding mothers: a systematic review
    Sikorski, J
    Renfrew, MJ
    Pindoria, S
    Wade, A
    PAEDIATRIC AND PERINATAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2003, 17 (04) : 407 - 417
  • [3] A systematic review of the nature of support for breastfeeding adolescent mothers
    Moran, Victoria Hall
    Edwards, Janet
    Dykes, Fiona
    Downe, Soo
    MIDWIFERY, 2007, 23 (02) : 157 - 171
  • [4] Mothers’ experiences and perceptions of breastfeeding peer support: a qualitative systematic review
    Yuanyuan Yang
    Huijuan Liu
    Xiaoyi Cui
    Jingwen Meng
    International Breastfeeding Journal, 19
  • [5] Mothers' experiences and perceptions of breastfeeding peer support: a qualitative systematic review
    Yang, Yuanyuan
    Liu, Huijuan
    Cui, Xiaoyi
    Meng, Jingwen
    INTERNATIONAL BREASTFEEDING JOURNAL, 2024, 19 (01)
  • [6] Adolescent Mothers' Breastfeeding Social Support Needs
    Grassley, Jane S.
    JOGNN-JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC GYNECOLOGIC AND NEONATAL NURSING, 2010, 39 (06): : 713 - 722
  • [7] Breastfeeding Among Working Mothers: A Systematic Review
    Wolf, Rebecca L.
    Varnell, Kacey
    Cunningham, Sarah
    Penning, Jenna
    Barboza, Sydnie
    Tonks, Taylor
    Hansen, Brooklynn
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, 2023, 77
  • [8] Employer-Based Programs to Support Breastfeeding Among Working Mothers: A Systematic Review
    Dinour, Lauren M.
    Szaro, Jacalyn M.
    BREASTFEEDING MEDICINE, 2017, 12 (03) : 131 - 141
  • [9] Instruments measuring omophobia: A systematic review
    Faraci, Palmira
    Valenti, Giusy Davila
    PSICOLOGIA SOCIALE, 2020, 15 (02) : 293 - 331
  • [10] Instruments Measuring Fatalism: A Systematic Review
    Valenti, Giusy D.
    Faraci, Palmira
    PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2022, 34 (02) : 159 - 175