The impact of fellowship surgical training on operative time and patient morbidity during robotics-assisted sacrocolpopexy

被引:9
作者
Carter-Brooks, Charelle M. [1 ,2 ]
Du, Angela L. [3 ]
Bonidie, Michael J. [1 ,2 ]
Shepherd, Jonathan P. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, 300 Halket St, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Magee Womens Hosp, Med Ctr, Div Urogynecol & Reconstruct Surg, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[4] Trinity Hlth New England, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Hartford, CT USA
关键词
Robotics; Sacrocolpopexy; Pelvic organ prolapse; PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE; ABDOMINAL SACROCOLPOPEXY; LEARNING-CURVE; TERM OUTCOMES; SURGERY; OBSTETRICS;
D O I
10.1007/s00192-017-3468-3
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Abdominal sacrocolpopexy is commonly performed for the surgical correction of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) in the USA. Over the last decade, fellowship programs have increased the number of these procedures performed robotically. Currently, there is a paucity of literature exploring the impact of fellowship training on outcomes of robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy (RASC). We sought to explore the impact of an expert surgeon operating alone versus with a fellow on operative time and perioperative morbidity associated with RASC. This is an analysis of a retrospectively collected cohort of all RASCs performed to treat POP from June 2010 to August 2015 by a single attending surgeon. Outcomes were compared by expert surgeon alone and with a fellow. We identified 208 RASCs, of which 124 (59.6%) were performed by an expert surgeon alone and 84 (40.4%) with a fellow. Eight fellows were included, with a median of 7 cases (interquartile range 5-13.5). Cases with fellows were 31.1 min longer than an expert surgeon alone (155.6 vs 124.5 min, p < 0.001), a 25% increase. Increased operative time for fellows remained significant on multivariate regression (34.2 min, p < 0.001) after adjusting for case order postmenopausal status, hysterectomy, mid-urethral sling, and bowel injury. Years in fellowship did not have an impact on operative time (p = 0.80). Complications were seen in 34 women (16.4%). On univariate regression, fellows did not have an impact on complications (OR 1.49, 95% CI [0.65-3.43]), which was unchanged on multivariate regression (OR 0.628, 95% CI [0.26-1.54]). Prolapse recurrence was seen in 19 women (9.5%). Fellows had no impact on prolapse recurrence (OR 0.478, 95% CI [0.17-1.38]), which was unchanged on multivariate regression (OR 0.266, 95% CI [0.17-1.49]). When an expert surgeon operated together with a fellow, operative time increased by 34 min without increasing prolapse recurrence or complications.
引用
收藏
页码:1317 / 1323
页数:7
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy: technique and learning curve [J].
Akl, Mohamed N. ;
Long, Jaime B. ;
Giles, Dobie L. ;
Cornella, Jeffrey L. ;
Pettit, Paul D. ;
Chen, Anita H. ;
Magtibay, Paul M. .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2009, 23 (10) :2390-2394
[2]   A Challenge between Trainee Education and Patient Safety: Does Fellow Participation Impact Postoperative Outcomes Following Bariatric Surgery? [J].
Aminian, Ali ;
Chaudhry, Rizwan M. ;
Khorgami, Zhamak ;
Andalib, Amin ;
Augustin, Toms ;
Rodriguez, John ;
Kroh, Matthew ;
Schauer, Philip R. ;
Brethauer, Stacy A. .
OBESITY SURGERY, 2016, 26 (09) :1999-2005
[3]   The Impact of Training Residents on the Outcome of Robotic-Assisted Sacrocolpopexy [J].
Bedaiwy, Mohamed A. ;
Abdelrahman, Mohamed ;
Deter, Stephanie ;
Farghaly, Tarek ;
Shalaby, Mahmoud M. ;
Frasure, Heidi ;
Mahajan, Sangeeta .
MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY, 2012, 2012
[4]   Trainee performance at robotic console and benchmark operative times [J].
Crane, Andrea K. ;
Geller, Elizabeth J. ;
Matthews, Catherine A. .
INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2013, 24 (11) :1893-1897
[5]   Robotic Surgery Training in Gynecologic Fellowship Programs in the United States [J].
Fatehchehr, Soorena ;
Rostaminia, Ghazaleh ;
Gardner, Michael O. ;
Ramunno, Elisa ;
Doyle, Nora M. .
JSLS-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC SURGEONS, 2014, 18 (03)
[6]   Robotic Vs Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy: 44-Month Pelvic Floor Outcomes [J].
Geller, Elizabeth J. ;
Parnell, Brent A. ;
Dunivan, Gena C. .
UROLOGY, 2012, 79 (03) :532-536
[7]   Robotic Surgical Training Program in Gynecology: How to Train Residents and Fellows [J].
Geller, Elizabeth J. ;
Schuler, Kevin M. ;
Boggess, John F. .
JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2011, 18 (02) :224-229
[8]   Short-Term Outcomes of Robotic Sacrocolpopexy Compared With Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy [J].
Geller, Elizabeth J. ;
Siddiqui, Nazenza Y. ;
Wu, Jennifer M. ;
Visco, Anthony G. .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 112 (06) :1201-1206
[9]   Survey of Robotic Surgery Training in Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency [J].
Gobern, Joseph M. ;
Novak, Christopher M. ;
Lockrow, Ernest G. .
JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2011, 18 (06) :755-760
[10]   Preparedness of Obstetrics and Gynecology Residents for Fellowship Training [J].
Chescheir, Nancy C. .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 126 (03) :672-672