Dynamic Large Eddy Simulations of the Ekman Layer Based on Stochastic Analysis

被引:10
|
作者
Kazemi, Ehsan [1 ]
Heinz, Stefan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wyoming, Dept Math, 1000 East Univ Ave, Laramie, WY 82071 USA
关键词
large eddy simulation; dynamic subgrid-scale modeling; Ekman layer; DIRECT NUMERICAL-SIMULATION; TURBULENT REACTING FLOWS; FOKKER-PLANCK EQUATIONS; DENSITY-FUNCTION; REALIZABILITY; MODELS; CLOSURE; RANS; LES;
D O I
10.1515/ijnsns-2015-0049
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Large eddy simulation (LES) of the neutrally stratified turbulent Ekman layer is performed. In particular, we compare three LES models with direct numerical simulation (DNS), which was validated against existing DNS. The models considered are a standard nondynamic LES model, the Smagorinsky model (SM), a standard dynamic LES model, the stabilized dynamic Smagorinsky model (DSM), and a new linear dynamic model (LDM), which was derived from a realizable stochastic turbulence model. The following conclusions are obtained. The SM does not represent an appropriate model for the flow considered. Mean velocity and turbulence intensities are poorly predicted. With respect to instantaneous fields, the SM provides a tilting of turbulence structures in the opposite direction as seen in DNS. The stabilized DSM also suffers from significant shortcomings. First, its behavior depends on the wall distance. Close to the wall, it produces acceptable turbulence structures. Away from the wall, it suffers from the same shortcomings as the SM. Second, it incorrectly describes the effect of grid coarsening. The new LDM is free from the disadvantages of the SM and stabilized DSM. Its predictions of both mean and instantaneous velocity fields agree very well with DNS. The relevant conclusion is the following. The use of a dynamic LES method represents a mean for correctly simulating large-scale structures (means and stresses), but it does not ensure a correct simultaneous simulation of small-scale structures. Our results indicate that a dynamic method designed in consistency with a realizable stress model can correctly simulate both large-scale and small-scale structures.
引用
收藏
页码:77 / 98
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A multiscale eddy simulation methodology for the atmospheric Ekman boundary layer
    Alam, Jahrul
    Islam, Mo Rokibul
    GEOPHYSICAL AND ASTROPHYSICAL FLUID DYNAMICS, 2015, 109 (01): : 1 - 20
  • [33] Estimation of Eddy Viscosity Profile in the Bottom Ekman Boundary Layer
    Cao, An-Zhou
    Chen, Hui
    Fan, Wei
    He, Hai-Lun
    Song, Jin-Bao
    Zhang, Ji-Cai
    JOURNAL OF ATMOSPHERIC AND OCEANIC TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 34 (10) : 2163 - 2175
  • [34] IDENTIFICATION OF EDDY VISCOSITY IN THE UNSTEADY MARINE EKMAN LAYER FLOW
    Fraunie, P.
    Aldebert, C.
    Devenon, J. L.
    Bourras, D.
    Sentchev, A.
    Shrira, V.
    CONFERENCE TOPICAL PROBLEMS OF FLUID MECHANICS 2019: PROCEEDINGS, 2019, : 85 - 88
  • [35] An Improved Ekman Layer Approximation for Smooth Eddy Diffusivity Profiles
    Oskar Parmhed
    Igor Kos
    Branko Grisogono
    Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 2005, 115 : 399 - 407
  • [37] On the application of the dynamic Smagorinsky model to large-eddy simulations of the cloud-topped atmospheric boundary layer
    Kirkpatrick, MP
    Ackerman, AS
    Stevens, DE
    Mansour, NN
    JOURNAL OF THE ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 2006, 63 (02) : 526 - 546
  • [38] A Scale-Dependent Dynamic Model for Scalar Transport in Large-Eddy Simulations of the Atmospheric Boundary Layer
    Fernando Porté-Agel
    Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 2004, 112 : 81 - 105
  • [39] Large-eddy simulations of subharmonic transition in a supersonic boundary layer
    Stolz, Steffen
    Schlatter, Philipp
    Kleiser, Leonhard
    AIAA Journal, 2007, 45 (05): : 1019 - 1027
  • [40] Large-Eddy Simulations of the Steady Wintertime Antarctic Boundary Layer
    van der Linden, Steven J. A.
    Edwards, John M.
    van Heerwaarden, Chief C.
    Vignon, Etienne
    Genthon, Christophe
    Petenko, Igor
    Baas, Peter
    Jonker, Harmen J. J.
    van de Wiel, Bas J. H.
    BOUNDARY-LAYER METEOROLOGY, 2019, 173 (02) : 165 - 192