Clinical Utility of the Alternative Model of Personality Disorders: A 10th Year Anniversary Review

被引:62
作者
Bach, Bo [1 ]
Tracy, Mikaela [2 ]
机构
[1] Reg Zealand, Mental Hlth Serv, Psychiat Res Unit, Ctr Personal Disorder Res, Faelledvej 6,Bygning 3, DK-4200 Slagelse, Denmark
[2] Univ Sydney, Fac Sci, Sch Psychol, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
DSM-5 alternative model of personality disorders (AMPD); clinical utility; treatment; Level of Personality Functioning Scale (LPFS); personality traits; DSM-5 SECTION II; DIAGNOSTIC CLASSIFICATION SYSTEMS; MENTAL-DISORDERS; INTERRATER RELIABILITY; PART I; TRAITS; INVENTORY; LEVEL; PSYCHOPATHY; CRITERION;
D O I
10.1037/per0000527
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, (DSM-5) alternative model of personality disorders (AMPD) has now been available for researchers and clinicians for a decade. The present article aims to provide a narrative review of literature on the AMPD framework with particular emphasis on its clinical utility, inclusive of clinicians' and patients' acceptability, ease of use, diagnostic accuracy, continuity with clinically familiar constructs, and proposed utility for treatment planning, case-formulation, and clinical management. The review specifically covers the utility of Criterion A (i.e., Level of Personality Functioning Scale) and Criterion B (i.e., maladaptive personality traits) in relation to common disorders of personality. By drawing on empirical studies, surveys, clinical cases, and recommendations, the current review points to various aspects of clinical utility as well as areas for improvement. One way of increasing the AMPD's feasibility for clinicians is to omit the transitional personality disorder (PD) hybrid types while retaining a purer diagnostic classification of PD severity and traits that also align with the International Classification of Diseases, Eleventh Revision (ICD-11), PD classification. This would allow for a more efficient assessment for busy practitioners working in general psychiatry and primary care while retaining the possibility of a more fine-grained elaboration of the PD diagnosis in high-resource specialist settings. Such revision could possibly be introduced in DSM-5.1 or DSM-6. We also propose that future exploration of the AMPD's clinical utility may involve its potential value for allocation of clinical resources, communication between clinicians and their patients' relatives, and utility for informing different treatment modalities.
引用
收藏
页码:369 / 379
页数:11
相关论文
共 122 条
  • [1] A Psychometric Review of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5): Current Status and Future Directions
    Al-Dajani, Nadia
    Gralnick, Tara M.
    Bagby, R. Michael
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 2016, 98 (01) : 62 - 81
  • [2] American Psychiatric Association, 2013, DIAGNOSTIC STAT MANU, DOI [10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596, DOI 10.1176/APPI.BOOKS.9780890425596, 10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596.744053]
  • [3] Amini M., 2018, J MAZANDARAN U MED S, V28, P121
  • [4] CLINICIAN PERSPECTIVES OF ANTISOCIAL AND BORDERLINE PERSONALITY DISORDERS USING DSM-5 SECTION III DIMENSIONAL PERSONALITY TRAITS
    Anderson, Jaime L.
    Sellbom, Martin
    Shealy, R. Clayton
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY DISORDERS, 2018, 32 (02) : 262 - 276
  • [5] Evaluating the DSM-5 Section III Personality Disorder Impairment Criteria
    Anderson, Jaime L.
    Sellbom, Martin
    [J]. PERSONALITY DISORDERS-THEORY RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2018, 9 (01) : 51 - 61
  • [6] EXAMINING THE ASSOCIATIONS BETWEEN DSM-5 SECTION III ANTISOCIAL PERSONALITY DISORDER TRAITS AND PSYCHOPATHY IN COMMUNITY AND UNIVERSITY SAMPLES
    Anderson, Jaime L.
    Sellbom, Martin
    Wygant, Dustin B.
    Salekin, Randall T.
    Krueger, Robert F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY DISORDERS, 2014, 28 (05) : 675 - 697
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2018, PERSONAL DISORD, DOI DOI 10.1037/per0000264
  • [8] Utility of DSM-5 section III personality traits in differentiating borderline personality disorder from comparison groups
    Bach, B.
    Sellbom, M.
    Bo, S.
    Simonsen, E.
    [J]. EUROPEAN PSYCHIATRY, 2016, 37 : 22 - 27
  • [9] How does level of personality functioning inform clinical management and treatment? Implications for ICD-11 classification of personality disorder severity
    Bach, Bo
    Simonsen, Sebastian
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN PSYCHIATRY, 2021, 34 (01) : 54 - 63
  • [10] Bach B, 2020, CAMB HANDB PSYCHOL, P450