Risk Assessment and Comparative Effectiveness of Left Ventricular Assist Device and Medical Management in Ambulatory Heart Failure Patients The ROADMAP Study 2-Year Results

被引:134
|
作者
Starling, Randall C. [1 ]
Estep, Jerry D. [2 ]
Horstmanshof, Douglas A. [3 ]
Milano, Carmelo A. [4 ]
Stehlik, Josef [5 ]
Shah, Keyur B. [6 ]
Bruckner, Brian A. [2 ]
Lee, Sangjin [7 ]
Long, James W. [3 ]
Selzman, Craig H. [5 ]
Kasirajan, Vigneshwar [6 ]
Haas, Donald C. [8 ]
Boyle, Andrew J. [9 ]
Chuang, Joyce [10 ]
Farrar, David J. [10 ]
Rogers, Joseph G. [4 ]
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[2] Houston Methodist Hosp, Houston, TX USA
[3] Integris Baptist Med Ctr, Oklahoma City, OK USA
[4] Duke Univ, Durham, NC USA
[5] Univ Utah, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[6] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Richmond, VA USA
[7] Spectrum Hlth, Grand Rapids, MI USA
[8] Abington Mem Hosp, Abington, PA 19001 USA
[9] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[10] Abbott, Pleasanton, CA USA
关键词
heart failure; left ventricular assist device; pharmacological therapy; MECHANICAL CIRCULATORY SUPPORT; DESTINATION THERAPY; IMPLANTATION; READMISSIONS; OUTCOMES; TRIAL; PUMP;
D O I
10.1016/j.jchf.2017.02.016
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES The authors sought to provide the pre-specified primary endpoint of the ROADMAP (Risk Assessment and Comparative Effectiveness of Left Ventricular Assist Device and Medical Management in Ambulatory Heart Failure Patients) trial at 2 years. BACKGROUND The ROADMAP trial was a prospective nonrandomized observational study of 200 patients (97 with a left ventricular assist device [LVAD], 103 on optimal medical management [OMM]) that showed that survival with improved functional status at 1 year was better with LVADs compared with OMM in a patient population of ambulatory New York Heart Association functional class IIIb/IV patients. METHODS The primary composite endpoint was survival on original therapy with improvement in 6-min walk distance >= 75 m. RESULTS Patients receiving LVAD versus OMM had lower baseline health-related quality of life, reduced Seattle Heart Failure Model 1-year survival (78% vs. 84%; p = 0.012), and were predominantly INTERMACS (Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support) profile 4 (65% vs. 34%; p < 0.001) versus profiles 5 to 7. More LVAD patients met the primary endpoint at 2 years: 30% LVAD versus 12% OMM (odds ratio: 3.2 [95% confidence interval: 1.3 to 7.7]; p = 0.012). Survival as treated on original therapy at 2 years was greater for LVAD versus OMM (70 +/- 5% vs. 41 +/- 5%; p < 0.001), but there was no difference in intent-to-treat survival (70 +/- 5% vs. 63 +/- 5%; p = 0.307). In the OMM arm, 23 of 103 (22%) received delayed LVADs (18 within 12 months; 5 from 12 to 24 months). LVAD adverse events declined after year 1 for bleeding (primarily gastrointestinal) and arrhythmias. CONCLUSIONS Survival on original therapy with improvement in 6-min walk distance was superior with LVAD compared with OMM at 2 years. Reduction in key adverse events beyond 1 year was observed in the LVAD group. The ROADMAP trial provides risk-benefit information to guide patient- and physician-shared decision making for elective LVAD therapy as a treatment for heart failure. (Risk Assessment and Comparative Effectiveness of Left Ventricular Assist Device and Medical Management in Ambulatory Heart Failure Patients [ROADMAP]; NCT01452802) (C) 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier on behalf of the American College of Cardiology Foundation.
引用
收藏
页码:518 / 527
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Incremental Value of Right Ventricular Size and Strain in the Risk Assessment of Right Heart Failure Post - Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation
    Aymami, Marie
    Amsallem, Myriam
    Adams, Jackson
    Sallam, Karim
    Moneghetti, Kegan
    Wheeler, Matthew
    Hiesinger, William
    Teuteberg, Jeffrey
    Weisshaar, Dana
    Verhoye, Jean-Philippe
    Woo, Y. Joseph
    Ha, Richard
    Haddad, Francois
    Banerjee, Dipanjan
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC FAILURE, 2018, 24 (12) : 823 - 832
  • [22] The incidence, risk factors, and outcomes associated with late right-sided heart failure in patients supported with an axial-flow left ventricular assist device
    Rich, Jonathan D.
    Gosev, Igor
    Patel, Chetan B.
    Joseph, Susan
    Katz, Jason N.
    Eckman, Peter M.
    Lee, Sangjin
    Sundareswaran, Kartik
    Kilic, Ahmet
    Bethea, Brian
    Soleimani, Behzad
    Lima, Brian
    Uriel, Nir
    Kiernan, Michael.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2017, 36 (01) : 50 - 58
  • [23] Outcomes of left ventricular assist device implantation for advanced heart failure in critically ill patients (INTERMACS 1 and 2): A retrospective study
    Zhigalov, Konstantin
    van den Eynde, Jef
    Chrosch, Thomas
    Goerdt, Lukas
    Sa, Michel Pompeu Barros Oliveira
    Zubarevich, Alina
    Papathanasiou, Maria
    Wendt, Daniel
    Luedike, Peter
    Pizanis, Nikolaus
    Koch, Achim
    Schmack, Bastian
    Rassaf, Tienush
    Kamler, Markus
    Ruhparwar, Arjang
    Weymann, Alexander
    ARTIFICIAL ORGANS, 2021, 45 (07) : 706 - 716
  • [24] Destination therapy with a left ventricular assist device for end-stage heart failure patients. A single center ten-year experience
    Rorris, Filippos-Paschalis
    Antonopoulos, Constantine N.
    Koutsavli, Dimitra
    Psevdi, Aikaterini
    Margari, Zafeiria J.
    Tsamatsoulis, Michalis
    Samiotis, Ilias
    Argiriou, Michalis
    Charitos, Christos
    HELLENIC JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2023, 69 : 61 - 63
  • [25] Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in morbidly obese patients with end-stage heart failure and left ventricular assist device: medium-term results
    Chaudhry, Umer I.
    Kanji, Aliyah
    Sai-Sudhakar, Chittoor B.
    Higgins, Robert S.
    Needleman, Bradley J.
    SURGERY FOR OBESITY AND RELATED DISEASES, 2015, 11 (01) : 88 - 93
  • [26] Continuous-flow left ventricular assist device support in patients with advanced heart failure: points of interest for the daily management
    Felix, S. E. A.
    Martina, J. R.
    Kirkels, J. H.
    Klopping, C.
    Nathoe, H.
    Sukkel, E.
    Hulstein, N.
    Ramjankhan, F. Z.
    Doevendans, P. A. F. M.
    Lahpor, J. R.
    de Jonge, Nicholaas
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2012, 14 (04) : 351 - 356
  • [27] Intraoperative Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation During Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation in High-Risk Heart Failure Patients
    Tankut, Sinan
    Gosev, Igor
    Yoruk, Ayhan
    Younis, Arwa
    McNitt, Scott
    Bjelic, Milica
    Vidula, Himabindu
    Wu, Isaac
    Aktas, Mehmet K.
    Goldenberg, Ilan
    Huang, David T.
    CIRCULATION-ARRHYTHMIA AND ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2022, 15 (06)
  • [28] Comparative cost-effectiveness of the Heart Ware versus Heart Mate II left ventricular assist devices used in the United Kingdom National Health Service bridge-to-transplant program for patients with heart failure
    Pulikottil-Jacob, Ruth
    Suri, Gaurav
    Connock, Martin
    Kandala, Ngianga-Bakwin
    Sutcliffe, Paul
    Maheswaran, Hendramoorthy
    Banner, Nicholas R.
    Clarke, Aileen
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2014, 33 (04) : 350 - 358
  • [29] Drug therapy and catheter ablation for management of arrhythmias in continuous flow left ventricular assist device's patients: a Clinical Consensus Statement of the European Heart Rhythm Association and the Heart Failure Association of the ESC
    Peichl, Petr
    Bayes-Genis, Antoni
    Deneke, Thomas
    Chioncel, Ovidiu
    Deriva, Marta
    Crespo-Leiro, Maria Generosa
    Frontera, Antonio
    Gustafsson, Finn
    Martins, Raphael P.
    Pagnesi, Matteo
    Maury, Philippe
    Petrie, Mark C.
    Sacher, Frederic
    Amir, Offer
    EUROPACE, 2024, 26 (11):
  • [30] Outcomes of Ambulatory Heart Failure Patients Managed With an Intra-aortic Balloon Pump Before Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation
    Ternus, Bradley
    Behfar, Atta
    Schirger, John
    Barsness, Gregory
    Eleid, Mackram
    Patel, Parag
    Stulak, John
    Jentzer, Jacob
    ASAIO JOURNAL, 2021, 67 (04) : 430 - 435