Can Identity Theory Improve Survey Design?

被引:3
作者
Britton, Logan L. [1 ]
Norwood, F. Bailey [2 ]
机构
[1] Kansas State Univ, Dept Agr Econ, Manhattan, KS 66506 USA
[2] Oklahoma State Univ, Dept Agr Econ, Stillwater, OK 74078 USA
关键词
anchoring; consumer behavior; Identity Theory; social desirability bias; survey design; SOCIAL DESIRABILITY BIAS; SURVEY RESPONSES; QUESTION; ORDER; HEURISTICS; VALIDITY; CHOICE;
D O I
10.1017/aae.2022.17
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
Question effects are important when designing and interpreting surveys. Question responses are influenced by preceding questions through ordering effects. Identity Theory is employed to explain why some ordering effects exist. A conceptual model predicts respondents will display identity inertia, where the identity cued in one question will be expressed in subsequent questions regardless of whether those questions cue that identity. Lower amounts of identity inertia are found compared to habitual inertia, where respondents tend to give similar answers to previous questions. The magnitude of both inertias is small, suggesting they are only minor obstacles to survey design.
引用
收藏
页码:422 / 439
页数:18
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] FIELD EXPERIMENTS ON THE ANCHORING OF ECONOMIC VALUATIONS
    Alevy, Jonathan E.
    Landry, Craig E.
    List, John A.
    [J]. ECONOMIC INQUIRY, 2015, 53 (03) : 1522 - 1538
  • [2] From dual processes to multiple selves: Implications for economic behavior
    Alos-Ferrer, Carlos
    Strack, Fritz
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 41 : 1 - 11
  • [3] Consumer vs. citizen, willingness to pay for restaurant food safety
    Alphonce, Roselyne
    Alfnes, Frode
    Sharma, Amit
    [J]. FOOD POLICY, 2014, 49 : 160 - 166
  • [4] Anthis J., 2017, SURVEY US ATTITUDES
  • [5] Repeated dichotomous choice formats for elicitation of willingness to pay:: Simultaneous estimation and anchoring effect
    Arana, Jorge E.
    Leon, Carmelo J.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2007, 36 (04) : 475 - 497
  • [6] Respondents to contingent valuation surveys: Consumers or citizens?
    Blamey, R
    Common, M
    Quiggin, J
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1995, 39 (03): : 263 - 288
  • [7] Loss Aversion and Anchoring in Commercial Real Estate Pricing: Empirical Evidence and Price Index Implications
    Bokhari, Sheharyar
    Geltner, David
    [J]. REAL ESTATE ECONOMICS, 2011, 39 (04) : 635 - 670
  • [8] Anchoring and adjustment in single-bounded, contingent-valuation questions
    Boyle, KJ
    Johnson, FR
    McCollum, DW
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1997, 79 (05) : 1495 - 1500
  • [9] Lies, Damned Lies, and Survey Self-Reports? Identity as a Cause of Measurement Bias
    Brenner, Philip S.
    DeLamater, John
    [J]. SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY QUARTERLY, 2016, 79 (04) : 333 - 354
  • [10] Burke PJ., 2009, Identity theory