Looking at ancillary systems for verb recovery: Evidence from non-invasive brain stimulation

被引:5
|
作者
Pisano, F. [1 ,2 ]
Marangolo, P. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Federico II, Dipartimento Studi Umanist, Via Porta Massa 1, I-80133 Naples, Italy
[2] Fdn Santa Lucia, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
关键词
Embodied cognition; Non-invasive brain stimulation; Verb recovery; Aphasia rehabilitation; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; SPINAL NETWORK EXCITABILITY; VISUAL WORD RECOGNITION; MIRROR NEURON SYSTEM; FUNCTIONAL TOPOGRAPHY; LINGUISTIC TYPOLOGY; CEREBELLAR PATIENTS; SPEECH PRODUCTION; GRAMMATICAL CLASS; LANGUAGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.bandc.2019.105515
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Several behavioural and neuroimaging studies have suggested that the language function is not restricted into the left areas but it involves regions not predicted by the classical language model. Accordingly, the Embodied Cognition theory postulates a close interaction between the language and the motor system. Indeed, it has been shown that non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) is effective for language recovery also when applied over sensorimotor regions, such as the motor cortex, the cerebellum and the spinal cord. We will review a series of NIBS studies in post-stroke aphasic people aimed to assess the impact of NIBS on verb recovery. We first present results which, following the classical assumption of the Broca's area as the key region for verb processing, have shown that the modulation over this area is efficacious for verb improvement. Then, we will present experiments which, according to Embodied Cognition, have directly investigated through NIBS the role of different sensorimotor regions in enhancing verb production. Since verbs play a crucial role for sentence construction which are most often impaired in the aphasic population, we believe that these results have important clinical implications. Indeed, they address the possibility that different structures might support verb processing.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Neuroplasticity and non-invasive brain stimulation in the developing brain
    Bandeira, Igor D.
    Lins-Silva, Daniel H.
    Barouh, Judah L.
    Faria-Guimaraes, Daniela
    Dorea-Bandeira, Ingrid
    Souza, Lucca S.
    Alves, Gustavo S.
    Brunoni, Andr E. R.
    Nitsche, Michael
    Fregni, Felipe
    Lucena, Rita
    NON-INVASIVE BRAIN STIMULATION (NIBS) IN NEURODEVELOPMENTAL DISORDERS, 2021, 264 : 57 - 89
  • [23] Stakeholder perspectives on non-invasive brain stimulation
    Maier, Moritz Julian
    Ramasawmy, Perianen
    Breuer, Johannes
    Bansen, Anne
    Oliviero, Antonio
    Northoff, Georg
    Antal, Andrea
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [24] The promises and perils of non-invasive brain stimulation
    Heinrichs, Jan-Hendrik
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LAW AND PSYCHIATRY, 2012, 35 (02) : 121 - 129
  • [25] Non-invasive brain stimulation in athletic competition
    Mehrsafar, Amir Hossien
    Gazerani, Parisa
    APUNTS-MEDICINA DE L ESPORT, 2019, 54 (203): : 105 - 106
  • [26] Non-invasive brain stimulation in neurological diseases
    Schulz, Robert
    Gerloff, Christian
    Hummel, Friedhelm C.
    NEUROPHARMACOLOGY, 2013, 64 : 579 - 587
  • [27] Non-invasive brain stimulation in research and therapy
    Desarkar, Pushpal
    Vicario, Carmelo Mario
    Soltanlou, Mojtaba
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [28] Non-invasive brain current stimulation in neurorehabilitation
    Coslett, H. Branch
    Hamilton, Roy
    RESTORATIVE NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2011, 29 (06) : 361 - 363
  • [29] Non-Invasive Alternating Current Stimulation Induces Recovery From Stroke
    Fedorov, Anton
    Chibisova, Yulia
    Gall, Carolin
    Sabel, Bernhard A.
    BRAIN INJURY, 2012, 26 (4-5) : 634 - 634
  • [30] Opportunities and obstacles in non-invasive brain stimulation
    Toth, Jake
    Kurtin, Danielle Lauren
    Brosnan, Meadhbh
    Arvaneh, Mahnaz
    FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2024, 18