Sensitivity Calibrations of K- and L-shell X-ray Lines for Elemental Analysis of Air Particulate Samples Using a Handheld XRF Spectrometer

被引:1
作者
Abiye, O. E. [1 ]
Ugwumadu, C. E. [1 ]
Kamara, A. J. [2 ]
Felizardo, J. P. [3 ]
Sannoh, A. [4 ]
机构
[1] Obafemi Awolowo Univ, Ctr Energy Res & Dev, Ife, Nigeria
[2] Univ Sierra Leone, Fourah Bay Coll, Dept Phys, Freetown, Sierra Leone
[3] Fluminense Fed Univ, Phys Inst, Lab Radioecol & Environm Change, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
[4] Univ Sierra Leone, Fourah Bay Coll, Dept Chem, Freetown, Sierra Leone
关键词
Handheld XRF; Air particulates; Limit of detection; Uncertainty; trueness and precision; FIELD-PORTABLE-XRF;
D O I
10.1007/s41810-021-00089-3
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The portability, ease of use, relative lower cost of procurement and simple maintenance of a handheld X-ray fluorescence analyzer makes it a potential alternative for air particulate analysis especially in highly polluted and economically disadvantaged regions of the world. Thus, this study assessed the performance of such analyzer in characterizing aerosol laden filters. Spectra of Certified Reference Materials (NIST 2783 CRM for aerosol filters) measured with a handheld X-ray fluorescence analyzer were calibrated and fitted using iterative nonlinear least-square fitting procedure provided by the International Atomic Energy Agency-Quantitative X-ray Analysis System. Elemental sensitivity calibration curves, method detection limits, uncertainty estimates of K- and L- X-ray lines in the elemental range 18 < Z < 39 and 47 < Z < 83 respectively were determined for four excitation conditions [High (Hi), Main (Ma), Light (Li) and Low (Lo)]. Signal counts for K alpha and beta (Ni, Zn, Se) and L alpha and beta (Pt, Te, Au) lines of the CRM's were used to validate the analytical method. Concentrations values were evaluated for trueness and precision. Hi excitation condition has the least sensitivity (5 times less than Ma, 30-40 times less than Lo and more than 100 times lower than Li) within varying range of atomic number. However, Hi (R-2 = 0.99) and Ma (R-2 = 0.96) condition had the best overall trueness and precision score within an acceptable relative standard deviation <= 6% for the six CRM's evaluated.
引用
收藏
页码:127 / 135
页数:9
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Characterisation of the different hands in the composition of a 14th century breviary by means of portable XRF analysis and complementary techniques [J].
Aceto, Maurizio ;
Agostino, Angelo ;
Fenoglio, Gaia ;
Capra, Valerio ;
Demaria, Enrico ;
Cancian, Patrizia .
X-RAY SPECTROMETRY, 2017, 46 (04) :259-270
[2]   Quality management and method Validation in EDXRF analysis [J].
Alvarez, R. Padilla ;
Markowicz, A. ;
Wegrzynek, D. ;
Cano, E. Chinea ;
Bamford, S. A. ;
Torres, D. Hernandez .
X-RAY SPECTROMETRY, 2007, 36 (01) :27-34
[3]  
Bac VT., 2003, NUCL SCI TECH, V2, P18
[4]   APPLICATION OF FIELD-PORTABLE X-RAY-FLUORESCENCE SPECTROMETERS FOR FIELD-SCREENING AIR MONITORING FILTERS FOR METALS [J].
BERNICK, MB ;
CAMPAGNA, PR .
JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 1995, 43 (1-2) :91-99
[5]  
BIRKS LS, 1972, EPAR272063
[6]   Novel use of field-portable-XRF for the direct analysis of trace elements in marine macroalgae [J].
Bull, Annie ;
Brown, Murray T. ;
Turner, Andrew .
ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2017, 220 :228-233
[7]   Environmental analysis [J].
Cave, MR ;
Butler, O ;
Cook, JM ;
Cresser, MS ;
Garden, LM ;
Miles, DL .
JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL ATOMIC SPECTROMETRY, 2000, 15 (02) :181-235
[8]   X-radiography of cultural heritage materials using handheld XRF spectrometers [J].
Chen, Jiuan Jiuan ;
Shugar, Aaron ;
Jehle, Ashley .
X-RAY SPECTROMETRY, 2019, 48 (04) :311-318
[9]   Portable Spectroscopy [J].
Crocombe, Richard A. .
APPLIED SPECTROSCOPY, 2018, 72 (12) :1701-1751
[10]   Feasibility of the use of a handheld XRF analyzer to measure skin iron to monitor iron levels in critical organs [J].
Dao, E. ;
Zeller, M. P. ;
Wainman, B. C. ;
Farquharson, M. J. .
JOURNAL OF TRACE ELEMENTS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2018, 50 :305-311