Stomatal density and calcium concentration of six snap bean cultivars

被引:2
|
作者
Quintana, JM
Harrison, HC
Palta, JP
Nienhuis, J
Kmiecik, K
Miglioranza, E
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Hort, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[2] Univ Londrina, Dept Agron, Londrina, PR USA
关键词
pod growth; stomata; calcium uptake; environment; stem; and leaf;
D O I
10.21273/JASHS.126.1.110
中图分类号
S6 [园艺];
学科分类号
0902 ;
摘要
Stomatal density of pods and leaves were determined for sis commercial snap bean cultivars (Phaseolus vulgaris L,'Evergreen', 'Hystyle', Labrador', 'Tenderlake','Top Crop', and 'Venture') grown at three planting dates, in an attempt to find morphological traits that could he related to cultivar differences in pod Ca concentration, Snap beans were planted three times at approximate to1-week intervals beginning 15 June 1995, and harvested 59 to 62 days after planting, Stomatal counts Here performed using a microscope linked to a video camera, and Ca concentration determinations were made using atomic absorption spectrophotometry. Calcium concentration and stomatal density of leaf tissue was higher than that of pods, Cultivar differences for pod Ca concentration (P = 0.001) and stomatal density (P = 0.001) were observed although cultivars with higher pod stomatal density did not necessarily result in higher pod Ca concentration. Calcium concentration and stomatal density for leaves did not differ among cultivars, Stomatal density and Ca concentration of pods were positively correlated (R-2 = 0,37), while pod maturity nas negatively associated to both pod Ca concentration (R-2 = 0,93), and pod stomatal density (R-2 = 0,99), The effect of planting dates was absent in pod Ca concentration and significant in pod stomatal density.
引用
收藏
页码:110 / 114
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Influence of pod stomatal density and pod transpiration on the calcium concentration of snap bean pods
    Grusak, MA
    Pomper, KW
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE, 1999, 124 (02) : 194 - 198
  • [2] Differences in pod calcium concentration for eight snap bean and dry bean cultivars
    Quintana, JM
    Harrison, HC
    Nienhuis, J
    Palta, JP
    Kmiecik, K
    HORTSCIENCE, 1999, 34 (05) : 932 - 934
  • [3] Differences in Pod Calcium Concentration for Eight Snap Bean and Dry Bean Cultivars
    Quintana, J.M.
    Harrison, H.C.
    Nienhuis, J.
    Palta, J.P.
    Kmiecik, K.
    Hortscience: A Publication of the American Society for Hortcultural Science, 1999, 34 (05): : 932 - 934
  • [4] Calcium fertilizers fail to affect pod calcium concentration and yield of four snap bean cultivars
    Quintana, JM
    Harrison, HC
    Palta, JP
    Nienhuis, J
    Kmiecik, K
    HORTSCIENCE, 1999, 34 (04) : 646 - 647
  • [5] Calcium fertilizers fail to affect pod calcium concentration and yield of four snap bean cultivars
    Quintana, J.M.
    Harrison, H.C.
    Palta, J.P.
    Nienhuis, J.
    Kmiecik, K.
    Hortscience: A Publication of the American Society for Hortcultural Science, 34 (04): : 646 - 647
  • [6] Stomatal density and gas exchange in six wheat cultivars
    Liao, Jian-Xiong
    Chang, Jie
    Wang, Gen-Xuan
    CEREAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2005, 33 (04) : 719 - 726
  • [7] Stomatal density and gas exchange in six wheat cultivars
    Jian-Xiong Liao
    Jie Chang
    Gen-Xuan Wang
    Cereal Research Communications, 2005, 33 : 719 - 726
  • [8] Comparison of pod calcium concentration between two snap bean populations
    Quintana, JM
    Harrison, HC
    Nienhuis, J
    Palta, JP
    Kmiecik, K
    Miglioranza, E
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE, 1999, 124 (03) : 273 - 276
  • [9] Comparison of soil and genotypic effects on calcium concentration of snap bean pods
    Miglioranza, E
    Barak, P
    Kmiecik, K
    Nienhuis, J
    HORTSCIENCE, 1997, 32 (01) : 68 - 70
  • [10] Variation in calcium concentration among sixty S-1 families and four cultivars of snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L)
    Quintana, JM
    Harrison, HC
    Nienhuis, J
    Palta, JP
    Grusak, MA
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE, 1996, 121 (05) : 789 - 793