Multi-Device Use: Understanding the Motivations behind Switching between Multiple Devices during a Task

被引:12
作者
Chen, Chi-Wen [1 ]
Koufaris, Marios [2 ]
机构
[1] Calif State Univ Dominguez Hills, Dept Informat Syst & Operat Management, 1000 E Victoria St, Carson, CA 90747 USA
[2] CUNY, Baruch Coll, Dept Informat Syst, Zicklin Sch Business, New York, NY 10021 USA
关键词
TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL; INFORMATION-SYSTEMS CONTINUANCE; MENTAL WORKLOAD; DECISION-MAKING; PERCEIVED EASE; FIT; SATISFACTION; COMPLEXITY; IMPACT; ANTECEDENTS;
D O I
10.1080/10447318.2020.1726106
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Multi-device use has become a popular pattern of device use in recent years. However, empirical studies pertaining to motivations behind intention to use multiple devices have been limited. The objective of this study focuses on answering an essential question: given that heterogeneous devices are available to users, why do users use multiple devices rather than a single device to complete a task? Both Task-Technology Fit Theory and mental workload paradigm are considered to develop eight hypotheses and build the research framework. A trip-planning scenario was designed and used in the questionnaire to understand the factors that motivate users to use multiple devices. A total of 217 subjects completed the questionnaire. The results show that perceived task fit with multi-device use forms users' attitudes toward and expected satisfaction with multi-device use. Furthermore, users' attitudes toward multi-device use trigger their intentions to use multiple devices. Additionally, perceived complexity of multi-device use hinders users from perceiving good task fit with multi-device use. Implications for theory, practice, and future research directions are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:1178 / 1193
页数:16
相关论文
共 78 条
[21]   User evaluations of IS as surrogates for objective performance [J].
Goodhue, DL ;
Klein, BD ;
March, ST .
INFORMATION & MANAGEMENT, 2000, 38 (02) :87-101
[22]   Understanding user evaluations of information systems [J].
Goodhue, DL .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1995, 41 (12) :1827-1844
[23]   TASK-TECHNOLOGY FIT AND INDIVIDUAL-PERFORMANCE [J].
GOODHUE, DL ;
THOMPSON, RL .
MIS QUARTERLY, 1995, 19 (02) :213-236
[24]   Development and measurement validity of a task-technology fit instrument for user evaluations of information systems [J].
Goodhue, DL .
DECISION SCIENCES, 1998, 29 (01) :105-138
[25]   Computer playfulness and anxiety: positive and negative mediators of the system experience effect on perceived ease of use [J].
Hackbarth, G ;
Grover, V ;
Yi, MY .
INFORMATION & MANAGEMENT, 2003, 40 (03) :221-232
[26]  
Heinssen R. K. Jr., 1987, Computers in Human Behaviour, V3, P49, DOI 10.1016/0747-5632(87)90010-0
[27]   EFFORT AND ACCURACY IN CHOICE [J].
JOHNSON, EJ ;
PAYNE, JW .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1985, 31 (04) :395-414
[28]  
Jokela T., 2015, 33 ANN ACM C HUM FAC
[29]  
Kane SK, 2009, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V5726, P722, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-03655-2_79
[30]   Considering Context: The Role of Mental Workload and Operator Control in Users' Perceptions of Usability [J].
Kokini, Christina M. ;
Lee, Sangwon ;
Koubek, Richard J. ;
Moon, Seung Ki .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION, 2012, 28 (09) :543-559