The US-Chinese trade war: an event study of stock-market responses

被引:43
作者
Egger, Peter H. [1 ,2 ]
Zhu, Jiaqing [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, CEPR, CESifo, Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Guangdong Univ Foreign Studies, Southern China Inst Fortune Management Res, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
LIBERALIZATION; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1093/epolic/eiaa016
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
At the beginning of 2018, President Trump started taking protective tariff measures against products from China in a sequence of events which started a 'trade war' between the United States and China. As the value of trade flows affected on both sides rose to a significant amount, this episode will become an interesting research object in the future. A thorough analysis of many outcomes of interest is at this point in time - and even will be in the next few years - impossible due to a lack of data which will only become available at a later point. However, as is customary with historical preferential liberalizations in trade agreements and potentially the opposite of it through Brexit, it is possible to gauge consequences of this 'trade war' or 'trade dispute' when focusing on the stocks of listed companies around related tariff-change announcements or implementations by the United States and China in the relevant time span. This paper proposes such an analysis and finds, very much consistent with the rumours from business, that the associated protectionist tariffs appear to have done to a large extent the opposite of what was intended: they hurt domestic firms in targeted and also other, untargeted sectors of an acting country, and they affect third countries and territories which are not even party to the 'trade war' or 'dispute'.
引用
收藏
页码:519 / 560
页数:42
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   The Impact of the 2018 Tariffs on Prices and Welfare [J].
Amiti, Mary ;
Redding, Stephen J. ;
Weinstein, David E. .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2019, 33 (04) :187-210
[2]   The China Syndrome: Local Labor Market Effects of Import Competition in the United States [J].
Autor, David H. ;
Dorn, David ;
Hanson, Gordon H. .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2013, 103 (06) :2121-2168
[3]  
Benguria F., 2019, DISSECTING IMPACT 20
[4]  
Bown C., 2018, Trumps trade war timeline: An up-to-date guide
[5]  
Bown C.P., 2018, 18 1 US CHINA EC R 1, P7
[6]   The Economic Effects of Brexit: Evidence from the Stock Market [J].
Breinlich, Holger ;
Leromain, Elsa ;
Novy, Dennis ;
Sampson, Thomas ;
Usman, Ahmed .
FISCAL STUDIES, 2018, 39 (04) :581-623
[7]   Heterogeneous firm-level responses to trade liberalization: A test using stock price reactions [J].
Breinlich, Holger .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2014, 93 (02) :270-285
[8]   The heterogeneous impact of Brexit: Early indications from the FTSE [J].
Davies, Ronald B. ;
Studnicka, Zuzanna .
EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2018, 110 :1-17
[9]   Technology, geography, and trade [J].
Eaton, J ;
Kortum, S .
ECONOMETRICA, 2002, 70 (05) :1741-1779
[10]   THE RETURN TO PROTECTIONISM [J].
Fajgelbaum, Pablo D. ;
Goldberg, Pinelopi K. ;
Kennedy, Patrick J. ;
Khandelwal, Amit K. .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2020, 135 (01) :1-55