Social and racial differences in selection of breast cancer adjuvant chemotherapy regimens

被引:131
作者
Griggs, Jennifer J.
Culakova, Eva
Sorbero, Melony E. S.
Poniewierski, Marek S.
Wolff, Debra A.
Crawford, Jeffrey
Dale, David C.
Lyman, Gary H.
机构
[1] Univ Rochester, Rochester, NY USA
[2] RAND Corp, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[3] Univ Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[4] Duke Univ, Duke Comprehens Canc Ctr, Durham, NC USA
[5] Duke Univ, Dept Med, Durham, NC USA
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2006.10.2749
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose Breast cancer outcomes are worse among black women and women of lower socioeconomic status. The purpose of this study was to investigate racial and social differences in selection of breast cancer adjuvant chemotherapy regimens. Methods Detailed information on patient, disease, and treatment factors was collected prospectively on 957 patients who were receiving breast cancer adjuvant chemotherapy in 101 oncology practices throughout the United States. Adjuvant chemotherapy regimens included in any of several published guidelines were considered standard. Receipt of nonstandard regimens was examined according to clinical and nonclinical factors. Differences between groups were assessed using chi(2) tests. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with use of nonstandard regimens. Results Black race (P = .008), lower educational attainment (P = .003), age >= 70 years (P = .001), higher stage (P < .0001), insurance type (P = .048), employment status (P = .045), employment type (P = .025), and geographic location (P = .021) were associated with the use of nonstandard regimens in univariate analyses. In multivariate analysis, black race (P = .020), lower educational attainment (P = .024), age >= 70 years (P = .032), and higher stage (P < .0001) were associated with receipt of nonstandard regimens. Conclusion The more frequent use of non-guideline-concordant adjuvant chemotherapy regimens in black women and women with lower educational attainment may contribute to less favorable outcomes in these populations. Addressing such differences in care may improve cancer outcomes in vulnerable populations.
引用
收藏
页码:2522 / 2527
页数:6
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
Abe O, 2005, LANCET, V365, P1687, DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(05)66544-0
[2]  
[Anonymous], J NATL CANC I MONOGR
[3]   Missed opportunities: Racial disparities in adjuvant breast cancer treatment [J].
Bickell, NA ;
Wang, JJ ;
Oluwole, S ;
Schrag, D ;
Godfrey, H ;
Hiotis, K ;
Mendez, J ;
Guth, AA .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 24 (09) :1357-1362
[4]   Racial and ethnic disparities in breast cancer mortality: Are we doing enough to address the root causes? [J].
Blackman, Dionne J. ;
Masi, Christopher M. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 24 (14) :2170-2178
[5]   Health disparities and health equity: Concepts and measurement [J].
Braveman, P .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2006, 27 :167-194
[6]   Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framewouk for improvement [J].
Cabana, MD ;
Rand, CS ;
Powe, NR ;
Wu, AW ;
Wilson, MH ;
Abboud, PAC ;
Rubin, HR .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 282 (15) :1458-1465
[7]   A NEW METHOD OF CLASSIFYING PROGNOSTIC CO-MORBIDITY IN LONGITUDINAL-STUDIES - DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION [J].
CHARLSON, ME ;
POMPEI, P ;
ALES, KL ;
MACKENZIE, CR .
JOURNAL OF CHRONIC DISEASES, 1987, 40 (05) :373-383
[8]  
De Vita V.T., 2004, CANC PRINCIPLES PRAC, V7th
[9]  
EIFEL P, 2000, NIH CONS DEV C STAT, V17, P1
[10]   Breast cancer treatment guidelines in older women [J].
Giordano, SH ;
Hortobagyi, GN ;
Kau, SWC ;
Theriault, RL ;
Bondy, ML .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (04) :783-791