A bridge to systems thinking in engineering design: An examination of students' ability to identify functions at varying levels of abstraction

被引:6
作者
Tomko, Megan [1 ]
Nelson, Jacob [2 ]
Nagel, Robert L. [2 ]
Bohm, Matthew [3 ]
Linsey, Julie [1 ]
机构
[1] Georgia Inst Technol, Woodruff Sch Mech Engn, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
[2] James Madison Univ, Dept Engn, 801 Carrier Dr,MSC 4113, Harrisonburg, VA 22807 USA
[3] Florida Polytech Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Lakeland, FL USA
来源
AI EDAM-ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE FOR ENGINEERING DESIGN ANALYSIS AND MANUFACTURING | 2017年 / 31卷 / 04期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Assessment; Function Abstractions; Functional Modeling; Function Enumeration; Systems Thinking; DEVICE REPRESENTATION; KNOWLEDGE;
D O I
10.1017/S0890060417000439
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
This paper aims to situate functional abstraction in light of systems thinking. While function does not extensively appear in systems thinking literature, the literature does identify function as part of systems thinking that enables us to recognize and connect that function has a role in building a systems thinking approach for students. A systems thinking approach is valuable for students since it helps them view a system holistically. In this research, we measure how well students are able to abstract function. We asked students to generate functions for two different products and examined how students taught functional modeling and function enumeration compare to students who are only taught function enumeration. The student responses were examined using a rubric that we developed and validated for assessing function. This rubric may be used to classify functions by correctness (correct, partially correct, and incorrect) and categories (high level, interface, low level, and ambiguous). On questions where students were not explicitly asked to write a high-level function or low-level function, and so on, students who were taught functional modeling were able to better demonstrate systems thinking in their responses (low-level and interface functions) than those students who were only taught function enumeration.
引用
收藏
页码:535 / 549
页数:15
相关论文
共 56 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2012, Advances in Cognitive Systems
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1991, Systems Thinking: Four Key Questions
  • [3] Camelia F., 2015, IEEE SYSTEMS J, DOI [10.1109/JSYST.2015.2488022, DOI 10.1109/JSYST.2015]
  • [4] Caulfield C. W., 2001, P 2001 IEEE INT C SY
  • [5] Chakrabarti A., 1998, P 15 AAAI NAT C AI M
  • [6] A case for multiple views of function in design based on a common definition
    Chakrabarti, Amaresh
    Srinivasan, V.
    Ranjan, B. S. C.
    Lindemann, Udo
    [J]. AI EDAM-ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE FOR ENGINEERING DESIGN ANALYSIS AND MANUFACTURING, 2013, 27 (03): : 271 - 279
  • [7] Chan W.T., 2015, CIVIL ENG DIMENSION, V17, P126, DOI [DOI 10.9744/CED.17.3.126-132, 10.9744/CED17.3.126-132, DOI 10.9744/CED17.3.126-132]
  • [8] Function in device representation
    Chandrasekaran, B
    Josephson, JR
    [J]. ENGINEERING WITH COMPUTERS, 2000, 16 (3-4) : 162 - 177
  • [9] Reasoning about function and its applications to engineering
    Chittaro, L
    Kumar, AN
    [J]. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN ENGINEERING, 1998, 12 (04): : 331 - 336
  • [10] The roles that artefacts play: technical, social and aesthetic functions
    Crilly, Nathan
    [J]. DESIGN STUDIES, 2010, 31 (04) : 311 - 344