Intra-industry effects of bank privatization: A clinical analysis of the privatization of the Commonwealth Bank of Australia

被引:28
作者
Otchere, I [1 ]
Chan, J [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Fac Econ & Commerce, Dept Finance, Parkville, Vic 3010, Australia
关键词
bank; privatization; rivals' reaction; CAMEL; operating performance;
D O I
10.1016/S0378-4266(02)00242-X
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This paper provides a comprehensive analysis of the effects of the privatization of the Commonwealth Bank of Australia (CBA) on the Bank's performance and that of the rival banks. First, we find that the major rival banks reacted negatively to the privatization announcements although the initial (partial privatization) and the final (full) privatization announcements elicited stronger stock market reaction from the rival banks. Second, we find that the CRA's long-term stock market performance improved markedly as the proportion of government ownership decreased, with the Bank's cumulative abnormal returns being 50% more than those of its rivals three years after the Bank had been fully privatized. Also, the CBA has not only been very efficient in reducing cost and improving its profitability in the post-privatization period, it has outperformed its rivals on almost all the operating performance measures and has become the most profitable bank in Australia. A particularly noteworthy finding is that the improvements in the CBA's operating and stock market performance and the rival banks' reaction to the partial and full privatization announcements were strongest after the Bank had been fully privatized. The implication of the results for governments contemplating privatization of state-owned enterprises is that full privatization is necessary in order to achieve strong gains in efficiency, profitability and stock market performance. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:949 / 975
页数:27
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   THE WEALTH EFFECTS OF DEREGULATION OF CANADIAN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS [J].
AMOAKOADU, B ;
SMITH, BF .
JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 1995, 19 (07) :1211-1236
[2]  
BALFOUR J, 1993, PRIVATIZATION FINANC
[3]   Detecting long-run abnormal stock returns: The empirical power and specification of test statistics [J].
Barber, BM ;
Lyon, JD .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 1997, 43 (03) :341-372
[4]   OWNERSHIP AND PERFORMANCE IN COMPETITIVE ENVIRONMENTS - A COMPARISON OF THE PERFORMANCE OF PRIVATE, MIXED, AND STATE-OWNED ENTERPRISES [J].
BOARDMAN, AE ;
VINING, AR .
JOURNAL OF LAW & ECONOMICS, 1989, 32 (01) :1-33
[5]   The financial and operating performance of newly privatized firms: Evidence from developing countries [J].
Boubakri, N ;
Cosset, JC .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1998, 53 (03) :1081-1110
[6]   A theory of privatisation [J].
Boycko, M ;
Shleifer, A ;
Vishny, RW .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 1996, 106 (435) :309-319
[7]   Inference in long-horizon event studies: A Bayesian approach with application to initial public offerings [J].
Brav, A .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2000, 55 (05) :1979-2016
[8]  
*COMM BANK AUSTR, 1991, CBA PROSP
[9]   AN EXAMINATION OF THE IMPACT OF THE GARN-STGERMAIN DEPOSITORY INSTITUTIONS ACT OF 1982 ON COMMERCIAL-BANKS AND SAVINGS AND LOANS [J].
CORNETT, MM ;
TEHRANIAN, H .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1990, 45 (01) :95-111
[10]  
COUGHLIN P, 1987, PRIVATIZATION AUSTR