Social Contact and Cognitive Functioning: The Role of Personality

被引:17
作者
Segel-Karpas, Dikla [1 ,2 ]
Lachman, Margie E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Brandeis Univ, Dept Psychol, Waltham, MA 02254 USA
[2] Univ Haifa, Dept Gerontol, IL-3498838 Haifa, Israel
来源
JOURNALS OF GERONTOLOGY SERIES B-PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES | 2018年 / 73卷 / 06期
关键词
Cognitive functioning; Personality; Social contact; The Big Five; BIG; 5; TRAITS; OLDER-ADULTS; 5-FACTOR MODEL; SUPPORT; PERFORMANCE; STRESS; MEMORY; YOUNG; INTELLIGENCE; INTEGRATION;
D O I
10.1093/geronb/gbw079
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Objectives: Social contact has been shown to be positively associated with cognitive functioning. It is unclear, however, whether all individuals can equally benefit from social contact with regard to their cognitive functioning. The goal of this study was to examine whether the beneficial effects of social contact are affected by individual differences in personality. Method: We examined the Big Five personality traits as moderators of the associations between social contact and episodic memory and executive functioning using the second wave of the Midlife in the U.S. study (N = 3,524, M(age) = 55.8). Results: High levels of Extraversion and low levels of Openness to Experience strengthened the association between social contact and memory and executive functioning. High levels of Neuroticism and Agreeableness weakened the association of social contact with memory but not with executive functioning. The results are consistent across adulthood. Discussion: Personality modifies the social contact-cognition association. Whereas extraverts may need social contact for cognitive stimulation, those who are high on Openness gain their stimulations elsewhere. The highly neurotic might experience contact as stressful and hence as less beneficial. Emotional rather than cognitive motivation might be the reason that the highly agreeable benefit less from social contact with regard to their cognitive functioning.
引用
收藏
页码:974 / 984
页数:11
相关论文
共 41 条
[11]  
Eysenck H.J., 1967, The biological basis of personality
[12]   Achieving and maintaining cognitive vitality with aging [J].
Fillit, HM ;
Butler, RN ;
O'Connell, AW ;
Albert, MS ;
Birren, JE ;
Cotman, CW ;
Greenough, WT ;
Gold, PE ;
Kramer, AF ;
Kuller, LH ;
Perls, TT ;
Sahagan, BG ;
Tully, T .
MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS, 2002, 77 (07) :681-696
[13]  
Goldberg L.R., 1992, Psychology Assessment, P26, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.26, DOI 10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.26, 10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.26]
[14]   Personality traits, facets and cognitive performance: Age differences in their relations [J].
Graham, Eileen K. ;
Lachman, Margie E. .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2014, 59 :89-95
[15]   Personality Stability Is Associated With Better Cognitive Performance in Adulthood: Are the Stable More Able? [J].
Graham, Eileen K. ;
Lachman, Margie E. .
JOURNALS OF GERONTOLOGY SERIES B-PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2012, 67 (05) :545-554
[16]  
Graziano W. G., 1997, Handbook of personality psychology, P795, DOI [10.1016/B978-012134645-4/50031-7, DOI 10.1016/B978-012134645-4/50031-7]
[17]  
John O. P., 1990, Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research
[18]  
Lachman M. E., 1997, TECHNICAL REPORT
[19]  
Lachman M.E., 2001, Handbook of midlife development, P279
[20]   Monitoring Cognitive Functioning: Psychometric Properties of the Brief Test of Adult Cognition by Telephone [J].
Lachman, Margie E. ;
Agrigoroaei, Stefan ;
Tun, Patricia A. ;
Weaver, Suzanne L. .
ASSESSMENT, 2014, 21 (04) :404-417