Who falls for rumor? Influence of personality traits on false rumor belief

被引:44
作者
Lai, Kaisheng [1 ]
Xiong, Xiling [2 ]
Jiang, Xiaoya [3 ]
Sun, Meiqi [4 ]
He, Lingnan [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Jinan Univ, Sch Journalism & Commun, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Dept Psychol, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Wisconsin, Sch Journalism & Mass Commun, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[4] Nanjing Univ, Sch Journalism & Commun, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[5] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Sch Commun & Design, Guangzhou 510006, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[6] Guangdong Key Lab Big Data Anal & Simulat Publ Op, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
关键词
Rumor; Big five; Social media; Information decision; POLITICAL COMMUNICATION; INFORMATION; MISINFORMATION; NEUROTICISM; ANXIETY; NEWS; BIAS;
D O I
10.1016/j.paid.2019.109520
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
While social media makes information easily accessible, it also breeds unprecedented quantities of false rumors that individuals frequently fall prey to. There have been increasing efforts to combat rumors, yet the first battle in this war would be targeting the most vulnerable people. However, systematic understanding of associations between individual characteristics and rumor belief is still lacking. With a national survey in China (N = 11,551), we investigated relationships between individuals' big five personality traits and their beliefs in false rumors circulating on social media. Correlations and multiple regression models showed that people high in neuroticism and extraversion were the most vulnerable to rumors. Furthermore, demographic characteristics, such as being female and having less education were associated with higher rumor belief. The findings enhance understanding of dispositional factors associated with peoples information decisions and provide guidance for anti-rumor campaigns.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Do personality traits influence investors' portfolios?
    Bucciol, Alessandro
    Zarri, Luca
    JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ECONOMICS, 2017, 68 : 1 - 12
  • [22] CRB: A new rumor blocking algorithm in online social networks based on competitive spreading model and influence maximization
    Dong, Chen
    Xu, Gui-Qiong
    Meng, Lei
    CHINESE PHYSICS B, 2024, 33 (08)
  • [23] Personality traits in bipolar disorder and influence on outcome
    Sparding, Timea
    Palsson, Erik
    Joas, Erik
    Hansen, Stefan
    Landen, Mikael
    BMC PSYCHIATRY, 2017, 17
  • [24] Influence and personality: relationships among superdiffuser traits and big five traits
    Carpenter, Christopher J.
    Levine, Tim
    Serota, Kim B.
    Docan-Morgan, Tony
    COMMUNICATION QUARTERLY, 2022, 70 (01) : 63 - 83
  • [25] Who Will Continue Using MOOCs in the Future? Personality Traits Perspective
    Al Abdullatif, Hend A.
    Velazquez-Iturbide, J. Angel
    IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 : 52841 - 52851
  • [26] The influence of group membership on false-belief attribution in preschool children
    Witt, Sarah
    Seehagen, Sabine
    Zmyj, Norbert
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 222
  • [27] The influence of personality traits on nurses' job satisfaction in Taiwan
    Chang, Y. H.
    Li, H-H.
    Wu, C. M.
    Wang, P. C.
    INTERNATIONAL NURSING REVIEW, 2010, 57 (04) : 478 - 484
  • [28] Who is sexually faithful? Own and partner personality traits as predictors of infidelity
    Altgelt, Emma E.
    Reyes, Melanie A.
    French, Juliana E.
    Meltzer, Andrea L.
    McNulty, James K.
    JOURNAL OF SOCIAL AND PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS, 2018, 35 (04) : 600 - 614
  • [29] Who Speaks Up? Motivational Configurations of Personality Traits to Voice Behavior
    Yi, Ming
    Wang, Shenghui
    De Pater, Irene E.
    Luo, Jinlian
    JOURNAL OF PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 21 (02) : 66 - 75
  • [30] Emotional negative events do not protect against false memories in young adults with depressive-anxious personality traits
    Toffalini, Enrico
    Mirandola, Chiara
    Drabik, Marta Joanna
    Melinder, Annika
    Cornoldi, Cesare
    PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2014, 66 : 14 - 18