Chromatographic competitive binding immunoassays: a comparison of the sequential and simultaneous injection methods

被引:17
作者
Nelson, MA [1 ]
Reiter, WS [1 ]
Hage, DS [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nebraska, Dept Chem, Lincoln, NE 68588 USA
关键词
chromatographic immunoassay; immunoaffinity chromatography; flow injection immunoassay; immunoassay theory;
D O I
10.1002/bmc.241
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Two approaches for performing competitive binding immunoassays by HPLC and other flow-based systems are the simultaneous and sequential injection methods. Both these techniques make use of a column with a limited amount of antibody, onto which is injected a sample and a fixed amount of a labeled analyte analog. An indirect measure of the unlabeled analyte in the sample is then obtained by looking at the amount of analog in either the nonretained or retained peaks. In the simultaneous injection mode, the sample and labeled analog are applied at the same time to the column, while in the sequential mode the sample is injected first, followed by the analog. This results in a difference in the analytical characteristics of these two approaches. This study used chromatographic theory and previous data obtained for injections of human serum albumin (HSA) onto an anti-HSA antibody column to compare the response, detection limits, range, and sensitivity of these methods. Under equivalent conditions, it was found that the sequential method always provided the best lower limit of detection and sensitivity. However, the simultaneous mode had a broader dynamic range and higher upper limit of detection. From these observations, several guidelines were developed regarding the use and selection of such assays for new applications. Copyright (C) 2003 John Wiley Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:188 / 200
页数:13
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
AGA DS, 1997, IMMUNOCHEMICAL TECHN
[2]   FLOW-INJECTION ENZYME-IMMUNOASSAY OF HAPTENS WITH ENHANCED CHEMILUMINESCENCE DETECTION [J].
AREFYEV, AA ;
VLASENKO, SB ;
EREMIN, SA ;
OSIPOV, AP ;
EGOROV, AM .
ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA, 1990, 237 (02) :285-289
[3]  
BUTLER JE, 1992, STRUCTURE ANTIGENS, P209
[4]   KINETIC CHROMATOGRAPHIC SEQUENTIAL ADDITION IMMUNOASSAYS USING PROTEIN-A AFFINITY-CHROMATOGRAPHY [J].
CASSIDY, SA ;
JANIS, LJ ;
REGNIER, FE .
ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 1992, 64 (17) :1973-1977
[5]  
Chan D.W., 1992, IMMUNOASSAY AUTOMATI
[6]   RAPID HETEROGENEOUS COMPETITIVE ELECTROCHEMICAL IMMUNOASSAY FOR IGG IN THE PICOMOLE RANGE [J].
DEALWIS, U ;
WILSON, GS .
ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 1987, 59 (23) :2786-2789
[7]  
DURST RA, 1991, GBF MONOG SERIES, V14, P181
[8]  
GUEBITZ G, 1993, ANAL CHIM ACTA, V283, P421
[9]   Development of a theoretical model for chromatographic-based competitive binding immunoassays with simultaneous injection of sample and label [J].
Hage, DS ;
Thomas, DH ;
Chowdhuri, AR ;
Clarke, W .
ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 1999, 71 (15) :2965-2975
[10]   SPLIT-PEAK AFFINITY CHROMATOGRAPHIC STUDIES OF THE IMMOBILIZATION-DEPENDENT ADSORPTION-KINETICS OF PROTEIN-A [J].
HAGE, DS ;
WALTERS, RR ;
HETHCOTE, HW .
ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 1986, 58 (02) :274-279