Field Tests of Two Prestressed-Concrete Girder Bridges for Live-Load Distribution and Moment Continuity

被引:5
作者
Eamon, Christopher D. [1 ]
Chehab, Alaa [2 ]
Parra-Montesinos, Gustavo [3 ]
机构
[1] Wayne State Univ, Civil & Environm Engn, Detroit, MI 48202 USA
[2] Wayne State Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Detroit, MI 48202 USA
[3] Univ Wisconsin, Civil & Environm Engn, Madison, WI 53706 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000859
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Two similar bridges constructed with a live-load continuous connection were tested for live-load distribution and joint continuity. Girder distribution factors (GDFs) were compared with AASHTO equivalent values. For positive moments on all girders as for negative moments on interior girders, results using AASHTO equivalent GDFs were found to be generally conservative. However, for negative moments on exterior girders, test results exceeded AASHTO values, significantly so with two-lane results. GDF results were verified with a finite-element analysis (FEA) model, which produced behavior similar to the field tests. With respect to joint continuity, it is estimated that a simple span would produce a maximum positive moment about 7% higher than the actual structure, whereas a completely continuous structure would produce a maximum positive moment about 16% lower than that of the actual structure. For negative moments, the actual structure experienced about 28% of that of a continuous structure. Shear reactions were also investigated. Recommendations are proposed for evaluating transverse distribution of live load as well as the longitudinal distribution of live load, accounting for the effect of joint continuity.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [11] INSTRUMENTATION AND TESTING OF BRIDGE REHABILITATED WITH EXODERMIC DECK
    DARLOW, MS
    BETTIGOLE, NH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1989, 115 (10): : 2461 - 2480
  • [12] Live Load Distribution Formulas for Single-Span Prestressed Concrete Integral Abutment Bridge Girders
    Dicleli, Murat
    Erhan, Semih
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BRIDGE ENGINEERING, 2009, 14 (06) : 472 - 486
  • [13] Eamon C.D., 2002, Journal Of Bridge Engineering, V7, P258, DOI [10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2002)7:5(258), DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2002)7:5(258)]
  • [14] Ebeido T., 1996, Journal of Bridge Engineering, V1, P37, DOI [10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(1996)1:1(37, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(1996)1:1(37]
  • [15] Eom J., 2001, ASCE J BRIDGE ENG, P489
  • [16] Development of Live-Load Distribution Factors for Glued-Laminated Timber Girder Bridges
    Fanous, Fouad
    May, Jeremy
    Wipf, Terry
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BRIDGE ENGINEERING, 2011, 16 (02) : 179 - 187
  • [17] Ghosn M., 1986, Transp. Res. Rec, V1072, P71
  • [18] Assessment of flexural lateral load distribution methodologies for stringer bridges
    Harris, Devin K.
    [J]. ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2010, 32 (11) : 3443 - 3451
  • [19] Live-load distribution factors for prestressed concrete, spread box-girder bridge
    Hughs, Erin
    Idriss, Rola
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BRIDGE ENGINEERING, 2006, 11 (05) : 573 - 581
  • [20] Influence of Asphalt Surfacing on Fatigue Evaluation of Rib-to-Deck Joints in Orthotropic Steel Bridge Decks
    Li, Ming
    Hashimoto, Kunitaro
    Sugiura, Kunitomo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BRIDGE ENGINEERING, 2014, 19 (10)