On making determinations of quality in teaching

被引:196
作者
Fenstermacher, GD [1 ]
Richardson, V [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Sch Educ, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
来源
TEACHERS COLLEGE RECORD | 2005年 / 107卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1467-9620.2005.00462.x
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This article examines the notion of quality teaching, exploring its conceptual, empirical and normative properties. We begin by analyzing the concept of teaching, separating it into its task sense (what teachers try to do) and its achievement sense (the student learning that teachers foster). The analysis suggests that any determination of quality in teaching must account for both the worthiness of the activity (good teaching) as well as the realization of intended outcomes (successful teaching). Good teaching is not the same as successful teaching, nor does one logically entail the other. For teaching to be both good and successful, it must be conjoined with factors well beyond the range of control of the classroom teacher. The analysis of the concept of teaching is then used to explore three programs of research on teaching: process-product, cognitive science, and constructivist. The article concludes with an analysis of the policy implications of this explication of quality teaching.
引用
收藏
页码:186 / 213
页数:28
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], HARVARD ED REV
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1984, CARING
[3]  
[Anonymous], HDB RES TEACHING
[4]  
[Anonymous], INSTRUCTOR
[5]  
[Anonymous], ED EVALUATION POLICY
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1979, Research on teaching: concepts, findings and implications
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1996, AUTHENTIC ACHIEVEMEN
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1979, RES TEACHING CONCEPT
[9]   Integrity in teaching: Recognizing the fusion of the moral and intellectual [J].
Ball, DL ;
Wilson, SM .
AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH JOURNAL, 1996, 33 (01) :155-192
[10]  
BAMBERGER J, 1981, FINAL REPORT EXPT TE