Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Targeted to Premotor Cortex Followed by Primary Motor Cortex Modulates Excitability Differently Than Premotor Cortex or Primary Motor Cortex Stimulation Alone

被引:25
作者
Chen, Mo [1 ]
Deng, Huiqiong [1 ,2 ]
Schmidt, Rebekah L. [1 ]
Kimberley, Teresa J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Sch Med, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Programs Phys Therapy & Rehabil Sci, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[2] Univ Texas Houston, Sch Med, Dept Psychiat & Behav Sci, Houston, TX USA
来源
NEUROMODULATION | 2015年 / 18卷 / 08期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Brain excitability; neuromodulation; premotor cortex; primary motor cortex; repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation; INTERVAL INTRACORTICAL INHIBITION; DORSAL PREMOTOR; FUNCTIONAL CONNECTIVITY; CORTICAL EXCITABILITY; SILENT PERIOD; HAND AREA; FACILITATION; RTMS; MOVEMENTS; INTERFERENCE;
D O I
10.1111/ner.12337
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Objectives: The excitability of primary motor cortex (M1) can be modulated by applying low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) over M1 or premotor cortex (PMC). A comparison of inhibitory effect between the two locations has been reported with inconsistent results. This study compared the response secondary to rTMS applied over M1, PMC, and a combined PMC + M1 stimulation approach which first targets stimulation over PMC then M1. Materials and Methods: Ten healthy participants were recruited for a randomized, cross-over design with a one-week washout between visits. Each visit consisted of a pretest, an rTMS intervention, and a post-test. Outcome measures included short interval intracortical inhibition (SICI), intracortical facilitation (ICF), and cortical silent period (CSP). Participants received one of the three interventions in random order at each visit including: 1-Hz rTMS at 90% of resting motor threshold to: M1 (1200 pulses), PMC (1200 pulses), and PMC + M1 (600 pulses each, 1200 total). Results: PMC + M1 stimulation resulted in significantly greater inhibition than the other locations for ICF (P = 0.005) and CSP (P < 0.001); for SICI, increased inhibition (group effect) was not observed after any of the three interventions, and there was no significant difference between the three interventions. Conclusion: The results indicate that PMC + M1 stimulation may modulate brain excitability differently from PMC or M1 alone. CSP was the assessment measure most sensitive to changes in inhibition and was able to distinguish between different inhibitory protocols. This work presents a novel procedure that may have positive implications for therapeutic interventions.
引用
收藏
页码:678 / 684
页数:7
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]   Lasting effects of repeated rTMS application in focal hand dystonia [J].
Borich, Michael ;
Arora, Sanjeev ;
Kimberley, Teresa Jacobson .
RESTORATIVE NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2009, 27 (01) :55-65
[2]   Facilitatory effects of 1 Hz rTMS in motor cortex of patients affected by migraine with aura [J].
Brighina, F ;
Giglia, G ;
Scalia, S ;
Francolini, M ;
Palermo, A ;
Fierro, B .
EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2005, 161 (01) :34-38
[3]  
Caparelli Ec, 2012, Open Neuroimag J, V6, P69, DOI 10.2174/1874440001206010069
[4]   Depression of motor cortex excitability by low-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation [J].
Chen, R ;
Classen, J ;
Gerloff, C ;
Celnik, P ;
Wassermann, EM ;
Hallett, M ;
Cohen, LG .
NEUROLOGY, 1997, 48 (05) :1398-1403
[5]   Low-frequency rTMS over lateral premotor cortex induces lasting changes in regional activation and functional coupling of cortical motor areas [J].
Chen, WH ;
Mima, T ;
Siebner, HR ;
Oga, T ;
Hara, H ;
Satow, T ;
Begum, T ;
Nagamine, T ;
Shibasaki, H .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2003, 114 (09) :1628-1637
[6]   Modulating neural networks with transcranial magnetic stimulation applied over the dorsal premotor and primary motor cortices [J].
Chouinard, PA ;
Van der Werf, YD ;
Leonard, G ;
Paus, T .
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2003, 90 (02) :1071-1083
[7]   Suprathreshold 0.3 Hz repetitive TMS prolongs the cortical silent period: potential implications for therapeutic trials in epilepsy [J].
Cincotta, M ;
Borgheresi, A ;
Gambetti, C ;
Balestrieri, F ;
Rossi, L ;
Zaccara, G ;
Ulivelli, M ;
Rossi, S ;
Civardi, C ;
Cantello, R .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2003, 114 (10) :1827-1833
[8]   Motor cortex plasticity induced by paired associative stimulation is enhanced in physically active individuals [J].
Cirillo, John ;
Lavender, Andrew P. ;
Ridding, Michael C. ;
Semmler, John G. .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 2009, 587 (24) :5831-5842
[9]   Impact of coil position and electrophysiological monitoring on determination of motor thresholds to transcranial magnetic stimulation [J].
Conforto, AB ;
Z'Graggen, WJ ;
Kohl, AS ;
Rösler, KM ;
Kaelin-Lang, A .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2004, 115 (04) :812-819
[10]   The effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on cortical inhibition in healthy human subjects [J].
Daskalakis, Zafiris J. ;
Moeller, Bertram ;
Christensen, Bruce K. ;
Fitzgerald, Paul B. ;
Gunraj, Carolyn ;
Chen, Robert .
EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2006, 174 (03) :403-412