Glycaemic Variability and Risk Factors of Pregnant Women with and without Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Measured by Continuous Glucose Monitoring

被引:15
作者
Gaborova, Martina [1 ]
Donicova, Viera [2 ]
Bacova, Ivana [1 ]
Pallayova, Maria [1 ]
Bona, Martin [1 ]
Peregrim, Igor [1 ]
Gresova, Sona [1 ]
Stimmelova, Judita [1 ]
Dzugasova, Barbora [3 ]
Blichova, Lenka Salamonova [4 ]
Donic, Viliam [1 ]
机构
[1] Pavol Jozef Safarik Univ, Dept Med Physiol, Fac Med, Kosice 04011, Slovakia
[2] Pavol Jozef Safarik Univ, Internal & Diabetol Outpatient Dept, Affiliated Study Fdn Fac Med, Human Care SRO, Kosice 04011, Slovakia
[3] Pavol Jozef Safarik Univ, Dept Med & Clin Microbiol, Fac Med, Kosice 04011, Slovakia
[4] Pavol Jozef Safarik Univ, Dept Pathol Physiol, Fac Med, Kosice 04011, Slovakia
关键词
continuous glucose monitoring; gestational diabetes mellitus; glycaemic variability; risk factors; WEIGHT-GAIN; COMPLICATIONS; INTOLERANCE; DIAGNOSIS; OUTCOMES; MOTHERS; INDEX;
D O I
10.3390/ijerph18073402
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Background: The aim of the study was to compare the continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)-determined glycaemic variability (GV) of pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and without GDM (CG; control group). The secondary aim was to evaluate the association between risk factors of diabetes in pregnancy and parameters of glyceamic control. Methods: Demographic, biometric and biochemical parameters were obtained for pregnant women (20-38 years old) who after an oral glucose tolerance test were examined by 7-day continuous glucose monitoring using a iPro(R)2 Professional CGM. Results: The differences in GV between women with GDM and CG compared by total area under glucose curve (total AUC, (mmol center dot day/L) was statistically significant (p = 0.006). Other parameters of glycaemic control such as mean glucose, standard deviation, coefficient of variation, J-index, % time-above target range 7.8 mmol/L (%TAR), % time-in range 3.5-7.8 mmol/L (%TIR), time-below target range 3.5 mmol/L (%TBR), glycated haemoglobin were not significantly different in the study groups. Risk factors (a family history of diabetes, pre-pregnancy BMI, higher weight gain and age) correlated with parameters of glycaemic control. Conclusions: We found a significant difference in GV of women with and without GDM by total AUC determined from CGM. TIR metrics were close to significance. Our work points at an increased GV in relation to the risk factors of GDM. Pregnant women with risk factors have higher probability of severe GV with its consequences on maternal and fetal health state.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2018, FORUM DIAB, V7, P15
[2]  
BARROS GM, 2020, REV, V73, P80983, DOI DOI 10.1590/0034-7167-2018-0983
[3]   Clinical Targets for Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data Interpretation: Recommendations From the International Consensus on Time in Range [J].
Battelino, Tadej ;
Danne, Thomas ;
Bergenstal, Richard M. ;
Amiel, Stephanie A. ;
Beck, Roy ;
Biester, Torben ;
Bosi, Emanuele ;
Buckingham, Bruce A. ;
Cefalu, William T. ;
Close, Kelly L. ;
Cobelli, Claudio ;
Dassau, Eyal ;
DeVries, J. Hans ;
Donaghue, Kim C. ;
Dovc, Klemen ;
Doyle, Francis J. ;
Garg, Satish ;
Grunberger, George ;
Heller, Simon ;
Heinemann, Lutz ;
Hirsch, Irl B. ;
Hovorka, Roman ;
Jia, Weiping ;
Kordonouri, Olga ;
Kovatchev, Boris ;
Kowalski, Aaron ;
Laffel, Lori ;
Levine, Brian ;
Mayorov, Alexander ;
Mathieu, Chantal ;
Murphy, Helen R. ;
Nimri, Revital ;
Norgaard, Kirsten ;
Parkin, Christopher G. ;
Renard, Eric ;
Rodbard, David ;
Saboo, Banshi ;
Schatz, Desmond ;
Stoner, Keaton ;
Urakami, Tatsuiko ;
Weinzimer, Stuart A. ;
Phillip, Moshe .
DIABETES CARE, 2019, 42 (08) :1593-1603
[4]   Glycemic control and pregnancy outcomes in women with type 2 diabetes from Poland. The impact of pregnancy planning and a comparison with type 1 diabetes subjects [J].
Cyganek, Katarzyna ;
Hebda-Szydlo, Alicja ;
Skupien, Jan ;
Katra, Barbara ;
Janas, Izabela ;
Borodako, Alicja ;
Kaim, Irena ;
Klupa, Tomasz ;
Reron, Alfred ;
Malecki, Maciej T. .
ENDOCRINE, 2011, 40 (02) :243-249
[5]   International Consensus on Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring [J].
Danne, Thomas ;
Nimri, Revital ;
Battelino, Tadej ;
Bergenstal, Richard M. ;
Close, Kelly L. ;
DeVries, J. Hans ;
Garg, Satish ;
Heinemann, Lutz ;
Hirsch, Irl ;
Amiel, Stephanie A. ;
Beck, Roy ;
Bosi, Emanuele ;
Buckingham, Bruce ;
Cobelli, Claudio ;
Dassau, Eyal ;
Doyle, Francis J., III ;
Heller, Simon ;
Hovorka, Roman ;
Jia, Weiping ;
Jones, Tim ;
Kordonouri, Olga ;
Kovatchev, Boris ;
Kowalski, Aaron ;
Laffel, Lori ;
Maahs, David ;
Murphy, Helen R. ;
Norgaard, Kirsten ;
Parkin, Christopher G. ;
Renard, Eric ;
Saboo, Banshi ;
Scharf, Mauro ;
Tamborlane, William V. ;
Weinzimer, Stuart A. ;
Phillip, Moshe .
DIABETES CARE, 2017, 40 (12) :1631-1640
[6]   Mid-trimester glycosylated hemoglobin levels (HbA1c) and its correlation with oral glucose tolerance test (World Health Organization 1999) [J].
Dubey, Devanshi ;
Kunwar, Shipra ;
Gupta, Uma .
JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2019, 45 (04) :817-823
[7]   Feasibility of FreeStyle Libre Flash Glucose Monitoring System in pregnant woman affected by type 1 diabetes [J].
Gatti, Milo .
ACTA DIABETOLOGICA, 2019, 56 (04) :481-483
[8]   Gestational Weight Gain and Risk of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus [J].
Hedderson, Monique M. ;
Gunderson, Erica P. ;
Ferrara, Assiamira .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 115 (03) :597-604
[9]   Interaction between Maternal Prepregnancy Body Mass Index and Gestational Weight Gain Shapes Infant Growth [J].
Heerman, William J. ;
Bian, Aihua ;
Shintani, Ayumi ;
Barkin, Shari L. .
ACADEMIC PEDIATRICS, 2014, 14 (05) :463-470
[10]  
Irving RR, 2008, REV PANAM SALUD PUBL, V23, P85, DOI 10.1590/S1020-49892008000200003