Individual differences discriminate event-related potentials but not performance during response inhibition

被引:134
作者
Roche, RAP [1 ]
Garavan, H
Foxe, JJ
O'Mara, SM
机构
[1] Univ Dublin Trinity Coll, Dept Psychol, Dublin 2, Ireland
[2] Univ Dublin Trinity Coll, Inst Neurosci, Dublin 2, Ireland
[3] Nathan S Kline Inst Psychiat Res, Orangeburg, NY 10962 USA
关键词
cognitive failures questionnaire; event-related potentials; Go/NoGo; N2/P3; complex;
D O I
10.1007/s00221-004-1985-z
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Event-related brain potentials (ERPs) were recorded from 20 normal participants while they completed a Go/NoGo response inhibition task. Previous ERP studies have implicated the N2 and P3 waveforms as the main indices of processing in this task, and functional brain imaging has shown parietal, prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortices to be involved in response inhibition. 32-channel ERP analysis revealed amplitude differences in the N2/P3 components when stimuli that required a button-press (Go stimuli) were compared with stimuli for which the response had to be withheld (No-Go stimuli), and in N2 and P3 latencies when successful withholds to No-Go stimuli were compared with unsuccessful attempts to inhibit. Further differences in the N2/P3 complex emerged when participants were grouped in terms of a measure of absentmindedness (the Cognitive Failures Questionnaire, CFQ); larger and earlier components were found for high CFQ respondents. We conclude that the latencies of the N2 and P3 may be the critical indicators of active inhibitory processes for this task, suggesting that a pattern of sequential activation rather than altered activity level in key structures may mediate success on the task. In addition, highly absentminded participants exhibited larger components for errors than did less absentminded participants when performing at the same level, which implies that the absentminded may require greater activity in the neural substrates of response inhibition in order to accomplish this task at a comparable level of performance to less absentminded participants.
引用
收藏
页码:60 / 70
页数:11
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
American Encephalographic Society, 1994, J CLIN NEUROPHYSIOL, V11, P40
[2]   Electrophysiological correlates for response inhibition in a Go/NoGo task [J].
Bokura, H ;
Yamaguchi, S ;
Kobayashi, S .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2001, 112 (12) :2224-2232
[3]   Neuroelectric mapping reveals precursor of stop failures in children with attention deficits [J].
Brandeis, D ;
van Leeuwen, TH ;
Rubia, K ;
Vitacco, D ;
Steger, J ;
Pascual-Marqui, RD ;
Steinhausen, HC .
BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 1998, 94 (01) :111-125
[4]   THE COGNITIVE FAILURES QUESTIONNAIRE (CFQ) AND ITS CORRELATES [J].
BROADBENT, DE ;
COOPER, PF ;
FITZGERALD, P ;
PARKES, KR .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1982, 21 (FEB) :1-16
[5]   Response priming in a go/nogo task: do we have to explain the go/nogo N2 effect in terms of response activation instead of inhibition? [J].
Bruin, KJ ;
Wijers, AA ;
van Staveren, ASJ .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2001, 112 (09) :1660-1671
[6]   Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection, and the online monitoring of performance [J].
Carter, CS ;
Braver, TS ;
Barch, DM ;
Botvinick, MM ;
Noll, D ;
Cohen, JD .
SCIENCE, 1998, 280 (5364) :747-749
[7]   Motor response suppression and the prepotent tendency to respond: a parametric fMRI study [J].
de Zubicaray, GI ;
Andrew, C ;
Zelaya, FO ;
Williams, SCR ;
Dumanoir, C .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2000, 38 (09) :1280-1291
[8]   LOCALIZATION OF A NEURAL SYSTEM FOR ERROR-DETECTION AND COMPENSATION [J].
DEHAENE, S ;
POSNER, MI ;
TUCKER, DM .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 1994, 5 (05) :303-305
[9]   QUANTIFYING SURPRISE - VARIATION OF EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS WITH SUBJECTIVE-PROBABILITY [J].
DUNCANJOHNSON, CC ;
DONCHIN, E .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1977, 14 (05) :456-467
[10]   LATE ERP COMPONENTS IN VISUAL AND AUDITORY GO NOGO TASKS [J].
FALKENSTEIN, M ;
KOSHLYKOVA, NA ;
KIROJ, VN ;
HOORMANN, J ;
HOHNSBEIN, J .
EVOKED POTENTIALS-ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1995, 96 (01) :36-43