Can barb thread design improve the pullout strength of bone screws? A BIOMECHANICAL STUDY AND FINITE ELEMENT EXPLANATION

被引:11
作者
Feng, X. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Qi, W. [2 ]
Fang, C. X. [2 ]
Lu, W. W. [2 ]
Leung, F. K. L. [2 ]
Chen, B. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Hong Kong, Li Ka Shing Fac Med, Dept Orthopaed & Traumatol, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] Southern Med Univ, Nanfang Hosp, Dept Orthopaed, Div Orthopaed & Traumatol, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[4] Yangjiang Peoples Hosp, Dept Orthopaed & Traumatol, Yangjiang, Peoples R China
来源
BONE & JOINT RESEARCH | 2021年 / 10卷 / 02期
关键词
Pullout strength; Buttress thread; Barb thread; Reverse buttress thread; Biomechanical study; Finite element study; FAILURE PROPERTIES; INSERTION; FIXATION; SHEAR;
D O I
10.1302/2046-3758.102.BJR-2020-0072.R2
中图分类号
Q813 [细胞工程];
学科分类号
摘要
Aims To draw a comparison of the pullout strengths of buttress thread, barb thread, and reverse buttress thread bone screws. Methods Buttress thread, barb thread, and reverse buttress thread bone screws were inserted into synthetic cancellous bone blocks. Five screw-block constructs per group were tested to failure in an axial pullout test. The pullout strengths were calculated and compared. A finite element analysis (FEA) was performed to explore the underlying failure mechanisms. FEA models of the three different screw-bone constructs were developed. A pullout force of 250 N was applied to the screw head with a fixed bone model. The compressive and tensile strain contours of the midsagittal plane of the three bone models were plotted and compared. Results The barb thread demonstrated the lowest pullout strength (mean 176.16 N (SD 3.10)) among the three thread types. It formed a considerably larger region with high tensile strains and a slightly smaller region with high compressive strains within the surrounding bone structure. The reverse buttress thread demonstrated the highest pullout strength (mean 254.69 N (SD 4.15)) among the three types of thread. It formed a considerably larger region with high compressive strains and a slightly smaller region with high tensile strains within the surrounding bone structure. Conclusion Bone screws with a reverse buttress thread design will significantly increase the pullout strength.
引用
收藏
页码:105 / 112
页数:8
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2007, ASTM F543-07.
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2016, F1839082012 ASTM
  • [3] Evaluation of bone plate with low-stiffness material in terms of stress distribution
    Benli, Semih
    Aksoy, Sami
    Havitcioglu, Hasan
    Kucuk, Mumin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2008, 41 (15) : 3229 - 3235
  • [4] Effect of structural design on the pullout strength of suture anchors for rotator cuff repair
    Chae, Soo-Won
    Kang, Ju-Yong
    Lee, Juneyoung
    Han, Seung-Ho
    Kim, Soung-Yon
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 2018, 36 (12) : 3318 - 3327
  • [5] Chang Pei-Kun, 2012, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, V27, pe96
  • [6] Evaluation of design parameters of osseointegrated dental implants using finite element analysis
    Chun, HJ
    Cheong, SY
    Han, JH
    Heo, SJ
    Chung, JP
    Rhyu, IC
    Choi, YC
    Baik, HK
    Ku, Y
    Kim, MH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2002, 29 (06) : 565 - 574
  • [7] Mechanical evaluation of fracture fixation augmented with tricalcium phosphate bone cement in a porous osteoporotic cancellous bone model
    Collinge, Cory
    Merk, Bradley
    Lautenschlager, Eugene P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2007, 21 (02) : 124 - 128
  • [8] Fully Threaded Versus Partially Threaded Screws: Determining Shear in Cancellous Bone Fixation
    Downey, Michael W.
    Kosmopoulos, Victor
    Carpenter, Brian B.
    [J]. Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery, 2015, 54 (06) : 1021 - 1024
  • [9] A cellular solid criterion for predicting the axial-shear failure properties of bovine trabecular bone
    Fenech, CM
    Keaveny, TM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICAL ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 1999, 121 (04): : 414 - 422
  • [10] Geng J P, 2004, J Oral Implantol, V30, P223, DOI 10.1563/0654.1