Quantitative diffusion MRI using reduced field-of-view and multi-shot acquisition techniques: Validation in phantoms and prostate imaging

被引:15
作者
Zhang, Yuxin [1 ,2 ]
Holmes, James [2 ]
Rabanillo, Inaki [3 ]
Guidon, Arnaud [4 ]
Wells, Shane [2 ]
Hernando, Diego [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Med Phys, Madison, WI 53705 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Radiol, Sch Med & Publ Hlth, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[3] Univ Valladolid, Lab MR Proc Imagen, Valladolid, Spain
[4] GE Healthcare, Applicat & Workflow, Boston, MA USA
关键词
Quantitative diffusion MRI; Prostate imaging; Reduced field-of-view; Multi-shot EPI; GAUSSIAN WATER DIFFUSION; TREATMENT RESPONSE; WEIGHTED MRI; 3; T; CANCER; ECHO; GUIDELINES; QUALITY; NOISE; EPI;
D O I
10.1016/j.mri.2018.04.006
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the reproducibility of quantitative diffusion measurements obtained with reduced Field of View (rFOV) and Multi-shot EPI (msEPI) acquisitions, using single-shot EPI (ssEPI) as a reference. Methods: Diffusion phantom experiments, and prostate diffusion-weighted imaging in healthy volunteers and patients with known or suspected prostate cancer were performed across the three different sequences. Quantitative diffusion measurements of apparent diffusion coefficient, and diffusion kurtosis parameters (healthy volunteers), were obtained and compared across diffusion sequences (rFOV, msEPI, and ssEPI). Other possible confounding factors like b-value combinations and acquisition parameters were also investigated. Results: Both msEPI and rFOV have shown reproducible quantitative diffusion measurements relative to ssEPI; no significant difference in ADC was observed across pulse sequences in the standard diffusion phantom (p = 0.156), healthy volunteers (p >= 0.12) or patients (p >= 0.26). The ADC values within the non-cancerous central gland and peripheral zone of patients were 1.29 +/- 0.17 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s and 1.74 +/- 0.23 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s respectively. However, differences in quantitative diffusion parameters were observed across different number of averages for rFOV, and across b-value groups and diffusion models for all the three sequences. Conclusion: Both rFOV and msEPI have the potential to provide high image quality with reproducible quantitative diffusion measurements in prostate diffusion MRI.
引用
收藏
页码:173 / 181
页数:9
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging as a Cancer Biomarker: Consensus and Recommendations [J].
不详 .
NEOPLASIA, 2009, 11 (02) :102-125
[2]  
[Anonymous], NEUROIMAGE
[3]  
[Anonymous], DOES REDUCED FOV DIF
[4]  
[Anonymous], ADC MEASUREMENT ACCU
[5]   Diffusion-weighted imaging in the prostate: an apparent diffusion coefficient comparison of half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin-echo and echo planar imaging [J].
Babourina-Brooks, Ben ;
Cowin, Gary J. ;
Wang, Deming .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2012, 30 (02) :189-194
[6]   ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012 [J].
Barentsz, Jelle O. ;
Richenberg, Jonathan ;
Clements, Richard ;
Choyke, Peter ;
Verma, Sadhna ;
Villeirs, Geert ;
Rouviere, Olivier ;
Logager, Vibeke ;
Futterer, Jurgen J. .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2012, 22 (04) :746-757
[7]   Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of the Prostate Image Quality and Geometric Distortion of Readout-Segmented Versus Selective-Excitation Accelerated Acquisitions [J].
Barth, Borna K. ;
Cornelius, Alexander ;
Nanz, Daniel ;
Eberli, Daniel ;
Donati, Olivio F. .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2015, 50 (11) :785-791
[8]   Diffusion-weighted imaging in the assessment of prostate cancer: Comparison of zoomed imaging and conventional technique [J].
Brendle, Cornelia ;
Martirosian, Petros ;
Schwenzer, Nina F. ;
Kaufmann, Sascha ;
Kruck, Stephan ;
Kramer, Ulrich ;
Notohamiprodjo, Mike ;
Nikolaou, Konstantin ;
Schraml, Christina .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2016, 85 (05) :893-900
[9]   Geometric Distortion in Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging of the Prostate-Contributing Factors and Strategies for Improvement [J].
Donato, Francisco, Jr. ;
Costa, Daniel N. ;
Yuan, Qing ;
Rofsky, Neil M. ;
Lenkinski, Robert E. ;
Pedrosa, Ivan .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2014, 21 (06) :817-823
[10]   Segmented diffusion-weighted imaging of the prostate: Application to transperineal in-bore 3 T MR image-guided targeted biopsy [J].
Fedorov, Andriy ;
Tuncali, Kemal ;
Panych, Lawrence P. ;
Fairhurst, Janice ;
Hassanzadeh, Elmira ;
Seethamraju, Ravi T. ;
Tempany, Clare M. ;
Maier, Stephan E. .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2016, 34 (08) :1146-1154