Adversarial balancing-based representation learning for causal effect inference with observational data

被引:19
作者
Du, Xin [1 ]
Sun, Lei [2 ]
Duivesteijn, Wouter [1 ]
Nikolaev, Alexander [2 ]
Pechenizkiy, Mykola [1 ]
机构
[1] Eindhoven Univ Technol, Eindhoven, Netherlands
[2] Univ Buffalo, Buffalo, NY USA
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Causal inference; Observational study General Adversarial Networks; Representation learning; PROPENSITY SCORE;
D O I
10.1007/s10618-021-00759-3
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Learning causal effects from observational data greatly benefits a variety of domains such as health care, education, and sociology. For instance, one could estimate the impact of a new drug on specific individuals to assist clinical planning and improve the survival rate. In this paper, we focus on studying the problem of estimating the Conditional Average Treatment Effect (CATE) from observational data. The challenges for this problem are two-fold: on the one hand, we have to derive a causal estimator to estimate the causal quantity from observational data, in the presence of confounding bias; on the other hand, we have to deal with the identification of the CATE when the distributions of covariates over the treatment group units and the control units are imbalanced. To overcome these challenges, we propose a neural network framework called Adversarial Balancing-based representation learning for Causal Effect Inference (ABCEI), based on recent advances in representation learning. To ensure the identification of the CATE, ABCEI uses adversarial learning to balance the distributions of covariates in the treatment and the control group in the latent representation space, without any assumptions on the form of the treatment selection/assignment function. In addition, during the representation learning and balancing process, highly predictive information from the original covariate space might be lost. ABCEI can tackle this information loss problem by preserving useful information for predicting causal effects under the regularization of a mutual information estimator. The experimental results show that ABCEI is robust against treatment selection bias, and matches/outperforms the state-of-the-art approaches. Our experiments show promising results on several datasets, encompassing several health care (and other) domains.
引用
收藏
页码:1713 / 1738
页数:26
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]  
Abadi Martin, 2016, Proceedings of OSDI '16: 12th USENIX Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation. OSDI '16, P265
[2]   Estimating Conditional Average Treatment Effects [J].
Abrevaya, Jason ;
Hsu, Yu-Chin ;
Lieli, Robert P. .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & ECONOMIC STATISTICS, 2015, 33 (04) :485-505
[3]  
Almond D, 2005, Q J ECON, V120, P1031, DOI 10.1162/003355305774268228
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2018, ARXIV181007406
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2020, PR MACH LEARN RES
[6]   Vitamin D supplementation and total mortality - A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials [J].
Autier, Philippe ;
Gandini, Sara .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2007, 167 (16) :1730-1737
[7]  
Bareinboim E., 2012, AAAI, P100
[8]  
Belghazi MI, 2018, PR MACH LEARN RES, V80
[9]   A comparison of observational studies and randomized, controlled trials. [J].
Benson, K ;
Hartz, AJ .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2000, 342 (25) :1878-1886
[10]   Random forests [J].
Breiman, L .
MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) :5-32