Environmental impacts of Brazilian beef cattle production in the Amazon, Cerrado, Pampa, and Pantanal biomes

被引:27
作者
Dick, Milene [1 ]
da Silva, Marcelo Abreu [1 ]
da Silva, Rickiel Rodrigues Franklin [1 ]
Ferreira, Otoniel Geter Lauz [2 ]
Maia, Manoel de Souza [2 ]
de Lima, Sebastiao Ferreira [3 ]
Neto, Vespasiano Borges de Paiva [4 ]
Dewes, Homero [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Fac Agr & Life Sci, Forage & Agrometeorol Dept, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Pelotas, Agron Fac Eliseu Maciel, Anim Sci Dept, Pelotas, RS, Brazil
[3] UFMS, Agron Fac, Campus Chapadao Do Sul, Brazil
[4] Fundacao Univ Fed Vale Sao Francisco, Agron Engn Fac, Petrolina, Brazil
[5] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Biosci Inst, Dept Biophys, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
关键词
Agroecosystems; Agro-ecological zoning; Global warming; Grassland management; Meat supply chain; Sustainable intensification; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; PRODUCTION SYSTEMS; CARBON FOOTPRINT; GHG EMISSIONS; SOUTHERN BRAZIL; MILK-PRODUCTION; WHITE CLOVER; LIVESTOCK; INTENSIFICATION; AGRICULTURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127750
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Grazing cattle production plays a fundamental role in rural landscape conservation, food security, and bio-economy, allowing for subsistence, income, insurance, and food around the world. Conversely, livestock is associated with negative impacts on human health, animal welfare, and ecosystems. Thereby, a broad knowledge of the impacts of pasture-based beef production is essential for proposing sustainable practices and systems, particularly in Brazil, due to its importance. In this context, this study aims to assess the environmental impacts of beef production systems characteristic of different Brazilian biomes and, thus, provide baselines that support the future development of differentiated mitigation alternatives. Four systems were defined based on the relevance of the livestock activity in the Amazon, Cerrado, Pampa, and Pantanal biomes. Its main environmental impacts and components were identified using the life cycle analysis - LCA method, during the entire productive lives of the animals. GHG emissions resulted in mean values for Brazilian beef production of 13.32 kg CO2 equivalent per kg of live weight gain. The Cerrado presented higher values of terrestrial acidification, depletion of metals and fossil fuels, freshwater and marine ecotoxicity, and particulate matter formation. The Pantanal was more impacting in terms of climate change, water depletion, freshwater and marine eutrophication, and the photochemical oxidants formation. The Pampa was the region with the highest agricultural land occupation. Human toxicity and terrestrial ecotoxicity were negative in all systems. Occupation of urban areas, ozone depletion, natural areas transformation, and ionizing radiation were not significant, concerning other human activities after normalization. The inclusion of different impact categories in the analysis offers new perspectives to minimize the impacts of Brazilian livestock on the planet. Pasture-based animal production systems with greater ecological, water, and carbon footprints show better results in indicators related to human health and environmental conservation. The intensification of grazing and the introduction of more productive forage species may represent new opportunities for adding value, improving life quality, and conservation of sensitive areas found in different environments that make up the diversity of Brazilian livestock production.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 89 条
  • [1] Animal source foods: Sustainability problem or malnutrition and sustainability solution? Perspective matters
    Adesogan, Adegbola T.
    Havelaar, Arie H.
    McKune, Sarah L.
    Eilitta, Marjatta
    Dahl, Geoffrey E.
    [J]. GLOBAL FOOD SECURITY-AGRICULTURE POLICY ECONOMICS AND ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 25
  • [2] Koppen's climate classification map for Brazil
    Alvares, Clayton Alcarde
    Stape, Jose Luiz
    Sentelhas, Paulo Cesar
    de Moraes Goncalves, Jose Leonardo
    Sparovek, Gerd
    [J]. METEOROLOGISCHE ZEITSCHRIFT, 2013, 22 (06) : 711 - 728
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2006, ISO 14040 2006 ENV M
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2016, NUTR REQ BEEF CATTL, V8th
  • [5] Comparing the environmental impacts of pasture-based and confinement-based dairy systems in Nova Scotia (Canada) using life cycle assessment
    Arsenault, Nicole
    Tyedmers, Peter
    Fredeen, Alan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2009, 7 (01) : 19 - 41
  • [6] A life cycle assessment of the environmental impacts of a beef system in the USA
    Asem-Hiablie, Senorpe
    Battagliese, Thomas
    Stackhouse-Lawson, Kimberly R.
    Rotz, C. Alan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2019, 24 (03) : 441 - 455
  • [7] Forage yield and sward structure characteristics of Brachiaria brizantha cultivars under grazing
    Batista Euclides, Valeria Pacheco
    Motta Macedo, Manuel Claudio
    do Valle, Cacilda Borges
    Barbosa, Rodrigo Amorim
    Goncalves, Welhington Velasques
    [J]. PESQUISA AGROPECUARIA BRASILEIRA, 2008, 43 (12) : 1805 - 1812
  • [8] Life cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from beef production in western Canada: A case study
    Beauchemin, Karen A.
    Janzen, H. Henry
    Little, Shannan M.
    McAllister, Tim A.
    McGinn, Sean M.
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2010, 103 (06) : 371 - 379
  • [9] On the overlap between effect and response plant functional types linked to grazing
    Blanco, C. C.
    Sosinski, E. E., Jr.
    dos Santos, B. R. C.
    da Silva, M. A.
    Pillar, V. D.
    [J]. COMMUNITY ECOLOGY, 2007, 8 (01) : 57 - 65
  • [10] Environmental impacts of Italian beef production: A comparison between different systems
    Bragaglio, Andrea
    Napolitano, Fabio
    Pacelli, Corrado
    Pirlo, Giacomo
    Sabia, Emilio
    Serrapica, Francesco
    Serrapica, Maria
    Braghieri, Ada
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 172 : 4033 - 4043