Molecular evidence-based medicine - Evolution and integration of information in the genomic era

被引:18
作者
Ioannidis, J. P. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ioannina, Sch Med, Dept Hyg & Epidemiol, Clin & Mol Epidemiol Unit, GR-45110 Ioannina, Greece
[2] Univ Ioannina, Sch Med, Dept Hyg & Epidemiol, Evidence Based Med & Clin Trials Unit, GR-45110 Ioannina, Greece
[3] Fdn Res & Technol Hellas, Biomed Res Inst, Ioannina, Greece
[4] Tufts Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Boston, MA 02111 USA
关键词
evidence-based medicine; molecular medicine; replication; research; translation;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2362.2007.01794.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Evidence-based medicine and molecular medicine have both been influential in biomedical research in the last 15 years. Despite following largely parallel routes to date, the goals and principles of evidence-based and molecular medicine are complementary and they should be converging. I define molecular evidence-based medicine as the study of medical information that makes sense of the advances of molecular biological disciplines and where errors and biases are properly appreciated and placed in context. Biomedical measurement capacity improves very rapidly. The exponentially growing mass of hypotheses being tested requires a new approach to both statistical and biological inference. Multidimensional biology requires careful exact replication of research findings, but indirect corroboration is often all that is achieved at best. Besides random error, bias remains a major threat. It is often difficult to separate bias from the spirit of scientific inquiry to force data into coherent and 'significant' biological stories. Transparency and public availability of protocols, data, analyses and results may be crucial to make sense of the complex biology of human disease and avoid being flooded by spurious research findings. Research efforts should be integrated across teams in an open, sharing environment. Most research in the future may be designed, performed, and integrated in the public cyberspace.
引用
收藏
页码:340 / 349
页数:10
相关论文
共 137 条
[1]   Microarray data analysis: from disarray to consolidation and consensus [J].
Allison, DB ;
Cui, XQ ;
Page, GP ;
Sabripour, M .
NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS, 2006, 7 (01) :55-65
[2]   The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: Explanation and elaboration [J].
Altman, DG ;
Schulz, KF ;
Moher, D ;
Egger, M ;
Davidoff, F ;
Elbourne, D ;
Gotzsche, PC ;
Lang, T .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2001, 134 (08) :663-694
[3]  
Altman DG, 2000, STAT MED, V19, P453, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(20000229)19:4<453::AID-SIM350>3.3.CO
[4]  
2-X
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1996, GUID CLIN PREV SERV, P39
[6]  
[Anonymous], GUID DEV HDB
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2004, J TRANSL MED, DOI DOI 10.1186/1479-5876-2-5
[8]   A COMPARISON OF RESULTS OF METAANALYSES OF RANDOMIZED CONTROL TRIALS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF CLINICAL EXPERTS - TREATMENTS FOR MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION [J].
ANTMAN, EM ;
LAU, J ;
KUPELNICK, B ;
MOSTELLER, F ;
CHALMERS, TC .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1992, 268 (02) :240-248
[9]   Opinion - Mendelian disorders deserve more attention [J].
Antonarakis, SE ;
Beckmann, JS .
NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS, 2006, 7 (04) :277-282
[10]   Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations II:: Pilot study of a new system -: art. no. 25 [J].
Atkins, D ;
Briss, PA ;
Eccles, M ;
Flottorp, S ;
Guyatt, GH ;
Harbour, RT ;
Hill, S ;
Jaeschke, R ;
Liberati, A ;
Magrini, N ;
Mason, J ;
O'Connell, D ;
Oxman, AD ;
Phillips, B ;
Schünemann, H ;
Edejer, TTT ;
Vist, GE ;
Williams, JW .
BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2005, 5 (1)