Regulatory Perspectives on Strength-Dependent Dissolution Profiles and Biowaiver Approaches for Immediate Release (IR) Oral Tablets in New Drug Applications

被引:10
|
作者
Suarez-Sharp, Sandra [1 ]
Delvadia, Poonam R. [1 ]
Dorantes, Angelica [1 ]
Duan, John [1 ]
Externbrink, Anna [2 ]
Gao, Zongming [2 ]
Ghosh, Tapash [1 ]
Miksinski, Sarah Pope [3 ]
Seo, Paul [1 ]
机构
[1] US FDA, Div Biopharmaceut, Off New Drug Prod, Off Pharmaceut Qual,Ctr Drug Evaluat & Res, Silver Spring, MD USA
[2] US FDA, Div Pharmaceut Anal, Off Testing & Res, Off Pharmaceut Qual,Ctr Drug Evaluat & Res, St Louis, MD USA
[3] US FDA, Off Pharmaceut Qual, Off New Drug Prod, Ctr Drug Evaluat & Res, Silver Spring, MD USA
来源
AAPS JOURNAL | 2016年 / 18卷 / 03期
关键词
biowaivers; immediate release oral dosage forms; multi-unit dissolution testing; strength-dependent dissolution acceptance criteria; strength-dependent dissolution profiles;
D O I
10.1208/s12248-016-9893-2
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Dissolution profile comparisons are used by the pharmaceutical industry to assess the similarity in the dissolution characteristics of two formulations to decide whether the implemented changes, usually minor/moderate in nature, will have an impact on the in vitro/in vivo performance of the drug product. When similarity testing is applied to support the approval of lower strengths of the same formulation, the traditional approach for dissolution profile comparison is not always applicable for drug products exhibiting strength-dependent dissolution and may lead to incorrect conclusions about product performance. The objective of this article is to describe reasonable biopharmaceutic approaches for developing a biowaiver strategy for low solubility, proportionally similar/non-proportionally similar in composition immediate release drug products that exhibit strength-dependent dissolution profiles. The paths highlighted in the article include (1) approaches to address biowaiver requests, such as the use of multi-unit dissolution testing to account for sink condition differences between the higher and lower strengths; (2) the use of a single- vs. strength-dependent dissolution method; and (3) the use of single- vs. strength-dependent dissolution acceptance criteria. These approaches are cost- and time-effective and can avoid unnecessary bioequivalence studies.
引用
收藏
页码:578 / 588
页数:11
相关论文
共 5 条
  • [1] Regulatory Perspectives on Strength-Dependent Dissolution Profiles and Biowaiver Approaches for Immediate Release (IR) Oral Tablets in New Drug Applications
    Sandra Suarez-Sharp
    Poonam R. Delvadia
    Angelica Dorantes
    John Duan
    Anna Externbrink
    Zongming Gao
    Tapash Ghosh
    Sarah Pope Miksinski
    Paul Seo
    The AAPS Journal, 2016, 18 : 578 - 588
  • [2] Biowaiver Eligibility of a Lower Strength Ramipril/Hydrochlorothiazide Immediate Release Tablets Using a New Validated HPLC Analytical Method
    Zaid, A. N.
    Ghanem, M.
    Maqboul, L.
    Zaid, H.
    Mahasne, A.
    DRUG RESEARCH, 2016, 66 (10) : 539 - 546
  • [3] Regulatory Experience with Continuous Manufacturing and Real Time Release Testing for Dissolution in New Drug Applications
    Kakhi, Maziar
    Li, Jing
    Dorantes, Angelica
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, 2023, 112 (10) : 2604 - 2614
  • [4] Understanding In Vivo Dissolution of Immediate Release (IR) Solid Oral Drug Products Containing Weak Acid BCS Class 2 (BCS Class 2a) Drugs
    Li, Min
    Zhang, Xinwen
    Wu, Di
    Anand, Om
    Chen, Hansong
    Raines, Kimberly
    Yu, Lawrence
    AAPS JOURNAL, 2021, 23 (06):
  • [5] Understanding In Vivo Dissolution of Immediate Release (IR) Solid Oral Drug Products Containing Weak Acid BCS Class 2 (BCS Class 2a) Drugs
    Min Li
    Xinwen Zhang
    Di Wu
    Om Anand
    Hansong Chen
    Kimberly Raines
    Lawrence Yu
    The AAPS Journal, 23