Artificial disc replacement and adjacent-segment pathology: 10-year outcomes of a randomized trial

被引:6
作者
Kontakis, Michael [1 ]
Marques, Catarina [1 ]
Lofgren, Hakan [2 ,3 ]
Mosavi, Firas [4 ]
Skeppholm, Martin [5 ,6 ]
Olerud, Claes [1 ]
MacDowall, Anna [1 ]
机构
[1] Uppsala Univ Hosp, Dept Surg Sci, Uppsala, Sweden
[2] Neuroorthopaed Ctr, Jonkoping, Sweden
[3] Linkoping Univ, Dept Biomed & Clin Sci, Linkoping, Sweden
[4] Uppsala Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Uppsala, Sweden
[5] Karolinska Inst, Hlth Econ & Hlth Evaluat Res Grp, Med Management Ctr, Dept Learning Informat Management & Eth LIME, Stockholm, Sweden
[6] Sophiahemmets Sjukhus, Ctr Spine Surg Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
  cervical radiculopathy; artificial disc replacement; adjacent-segment pathology; anterior decompression; NECK DISABILITY INDEX; ANTERIOR CERVICAL DISKECTOMY; INTERVERTEBRAL DISC; SPINE BIOMECHANICS; RATING-SCALE; FUSION; ARTHROPLASTY; RADICULOPATHY; RELIABILITY; SINGLE;
D O I
10.3171/2021.9.SPINE21904
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVE Artificial disc replacement (ADR) is designed to preserve motion and thus protect against adjacentsegment pathology (ASP) and act as an alternative treatment to fusion surgery. The question remains, how well do ADR devices perform after 10 years of follow-up compared with fusion surgery in terms of patient satisfaction, sustainability, and protection against ASP? METHODS This was the 10-year follow-up study of 153 participants who underwent ADR or fusion surgery after anterior decompression due to cervical degenerative radiculopathy (ISRCTN registration no. 44347115). Scores on the Neck Disability Index (NDI), EQ-5D, and visual analog scale for neck and arm pain were obtained from the Swedish Spine Registry and analyzed using ANCOVA. Information about secondary surgical procedures was collected from medical records and presented as Kaplan-Meier curves. MRI and flexion-extension radiography were performed, and ASP was graded according to the Miyazaki classification system. RESULTS Ten participants were lost to follow-up, which left 143 participants (80 underwent ADR and 65 underwent anterior cervical discectomy and fusion). There were no differences between groups in terms of patient-reported outcome measures (10-year difference in NDI scores 1.7 points, 95% CI ???5.1 to 8.5, p = 0.61). Nineteen (24%) participants in the ADR group compared with 9 (14%) in the fusion group underwent secondary surgical procedures. The higher reoperation rate of the ADR group was mainly due to 11 female participants with device loosening. The rates of reoperation due to ASP were similar between groups, which was confirmed with MRI assessment of ASP that also showed no differences between the groups (p = 0.21). CONCLUSIONS This was the first 10-year follow-up study to compare ADR with fusion surgery and to provide MRI information for the assessment of ASP. The authors found no benefit of ADR over fusion surgery after anterior decompression for cervical degenerative radiculopathy. and fusion; randomized trial; degenerative
引用
收藏
页码:945 / 953
页数:9
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Terminology INTRODUCTION [J].
Anderson, Paul A. ;
Andersson, Gunnar B. J. ;
Arnold, Paul M. ;
Brodke, Darrel S. ;
Brodt, Erika D. ;
Chapman, Jens R. ;
Chou, Dean ;
Dekutoski, Mark ;
Dettori, Joseph R. ;
DeVine, John G. ;
Ely, Claire G. ;
Fehlings, Michael G. ;
Fischer, Dena J. ;
Fourney, Daryl R. ;
Hansen, Mitchell A. ;
Harrod, Christopher Chambliss ;
Hashimoto, Robin ;
Hermsmeyer, Jeffrey T. ;
Hilibrand, Alan S. ;
Kasliwal, Manish K. ;
Kelly, Michael P. ;
Kim, Han Jo ;
Kraemer, Paul ;
Lawrence, Brandon D. ;
Lee, Michael J. ;
Lenke, Lawrence G. ;
Norvell, Daniel C. ;
Raich, Annie ;
Riew, K. Daniel ;
Shaffrey, Christopher I. ;
Skelly, Andrea C. ;
Smith, Justin S. ;
Standaert, Christopher J. ;
Van Alstyne, Ellen M. ;
Wang, Jeffrey C. .
SPINE, 2012, 37 (22) :S8-S9
[2]   Neck Disability Index, short form-36 physical component summary and pain scales for neck and arm pain: the minimum clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit after cervical spine fusion [J].
Carreon, Leah Y. ;
Glassman, Steven D. ;
Campbell, Mitchell J. ;
Anderson, Paul A. .
SPINE JOURNAL, 2010, 10 (06) :469-474
[3]   Five-Year Reoperation Rates, Cervical Total Disc Replacement Versus Fusion, Results of a Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial [J].
Delamarter, Rick B. ;
Zigler, Jack .
SPINE, 2013, 38 (09) :711-717
[4]   Biomechanical study on the effect of cervical spine fusion on adjacent-level intradiscal pressure and segmental motion [J].
Eck, JC ;
Humphreys, SC ;
Lim, TH ;
Jeong, ST ;
Kim, JG ;
Hodges, SD ;
An, HS .
SPINE, 2002, 27 (22) :2431-2434
[5]   Do design variations in the artificial disc influence cervical spine biomechanics? A finite element investigation [J].
Faizan, Ahmad ;
Goel, Vijay K. ;
Garfin, Steven R. ;
Bono, Christopher M. ;
Serhan, Hassan ;
Biyani, Ashok ;
Elgafy, Hossein ;
Krishna, Manoj ;
Friesem, Tai .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2012, 21 :S653-S662
[6]   Parameters that effect spine biomechanics following cervical disc replacement [J].
Goel, Vijay K. ;
Faizan, Ahmad ;
Palepu, Vivek ;
Bhattacharya, Sanghita .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2012, 21 :S688-S699
[7]   Two-level cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: 10-year outcomes of a prospective, randomized investigational device exemption clinical trial [J].
Gornet, Matthew F. ;
Lanman, Todd H. ;
Burkus, J. Kenneth ;
Dryer, Randall F. ;
McConnell, Jeffrey R. ;
Hodges, Scott D. ;
Schranck, Francine W. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2019, 31 (04) :508-518
[8]   Very Late Complications of Cervical Arthroplasty Results of 2 Controlled Randomized Prospective Studies From a Single Investigator Site [J].
Hacker, Francis M. ;
Babcock, Rebecca M. ;
Hacker, Robert J. .
SPINE, 2013, 38 (26) :2223-2226
[9]   Radiculopathy and myelopathy at segments adjacent to the site of a previous anterior cervical arthrodesis [J].
Hilibrand, AS ;
Carlson, GD ;
Palumbo, MA ;
Jones, PK ;
Bohlman, HH .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1999, 81A (04) :519-528
[10]   Comparison of radiographic changes after ACDF versus Bryan disc arthroplasty in single and bi-level cases [J].
Kim, Seok Woo ;
Limson, Marc Anthony ;
Kim, Soo-Bum ;
Arbatin, Jose Joefrey F. ;
Chang, Kee-Young ;
Park, Moon-Soo ;
Shin, Jae-hyuk ;
Ju, Yeong-Su .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2009, 18 (02) :218-231