Life cycle energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions of urban residential buildings in Guangzhou city

被引:64
作者
Zhan, Jinyan [1 ]
Liu, Wei [1 ]
Wu, Feng [2 ,3 ]
Li, Zhihui [2 ,3 ]
Wang, Chao [1 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Normal Univ, State Key Lab Water Environm Simulat, Sch Environm, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Sci, Ctr Chinese Agr Policy, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Energy consumption; Greenhouse gas emissions; Life-cycle analysis; Residential buildings; Guangzhou city; CARBON EMISSIONS; LCA; CHALLENGES; QUANTIFICATION; INVENTORY; DEMAND;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.124
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Carbon emissions are derived mainly from the building, industrial, and transport sectors. Buildings are responsible for more than 40% of global energy use and for as much as 33% of global greenhouse gas emissions. By the end of 2016, 57.4% of the total population lived in urban areas in China, a dramatic increase from 26% in 1990. It is essential to study and analyze both energy consumption and carbon emissions of buildings. Taking Guangzhou city of China as an example, this study applied a hybrid life cycle assessment approach to quantify both the energy consumption and CO2 emissions throughout the life cycle of an urban residential building. The data was collected from the Guangzhou input output (10) table of 2012, Guangzhou Statistical Yearbook of 2013, China Electric Power Yearbook of 2013, and statistical data of the studied building. Results showed that the overall life cycle energy consumption and CO2 (eq.) emissions for the studied building, constructed in 2012, were approximately 72,591.98 GJ and 12,637.32 t, respectively. The largest CO2 (eq.) emission factor was oil and the smallest one was electricity. The CO2 emissions of steel, concrete, brick, and cement together accounted for 76.69% of the total emissions which are related to building materials in the preparation stage. This research not only promotes the construction of eco-cities or eco-communities, but also provides decision makers with comprehensive data on the energy consumption and environmental impacts of residential buildings. The findings are of considerable importance in terms of energy saving and emissions reductions for society as a whole.
引用
收藏
页码:318 / 326
页数:9
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   Energy use during the life cycle of buildings: A method [J].
Adalberth, K .
BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 1997, 32 (04) :317-320
[2]   Recent developments, future challenges and new research directions in LCA of buildings: A critical review [J].
Anand, Chirjiv Kaur ;
Amor, Ben .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2017, 67 :408-416
[3]  
Associates F., 1998, INDIAN J EXP BIOL, V10, P8
[4]   Life cycle energy (LCEA) and carbon dioxide emissions (LCCO2A) assessment of two residential buildings in Gaziantep, Turkey [J].
Atmaca, Adem ;
Atmaca, Nihat .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2015, 102 :417-431
[5]   Measuring environmental performance of industrial sub-sectors in China: A stochastic metafrontier approach [J].
Bai, Yuping ;
Deng, Xiangzheng ;
Zhang, Qian ;
Wang, Zhan .
PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY OF THE EARTH, 2017, 101 :3-12
[6]   Significance of mobility in the life-cycle assessment of buildings [J].
Bastos, Joana ;
Batterman, Stuart A. ;
Freire, Fausto .
BUILDING RESEARCH AND INFORMATION, 2016, 44 (04) :376-393
[7]  
Blair P.D, 2009, INPUT OUTPUT ANAL FD
[8]   The embodied air pollutant emissions and water footprints of buildings in China: a quantification using disaggregated input-output life cycle inventory model [J].
Chang, Yuan ;
Huang, Zhiye ;
Ries, Robert J. ;
Masanet, Eric .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 113 :274-284
[9]   Disaggregated I-O LCA model for building product chain energy quantification: A case from China [J].
Chang, Yuan ;
Ries, Robert J. ;
Man, Qingpeng ;
Wang, Yaowu .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2014, 72 :212-221
[10]   Life-cycle energy of residential buildings in China [J].
Chang, Yuan ;
Ries, Robert J. ;
Wang, Yaowu .
ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 62 :656-664