Energy-Flow-Driven (EFD) Semi-active Suspension Control

被引:0
作者
Liu, Yilun [1 ]
Zuo, Lei [1 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Stony Brook, Dept Mech Engn, Stony Brook, NY 11790 USA
来源
2014 AMERICAN CONTROL CONFERENCE (ACC) | 2014年
关键词
HOOK; ADD;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Compared to the active damping control, semi-active control is a more preferred alternative for practical use. Many different semi-active control methods have been developed, among which Skyhook (SH), Acceleration-Driven-Damper (ADD) and Model Predictive Control (MPC) have received lots of attentions. In order to improve the existing semi-active control methods in terms of performance and cost, a novel method Energy-Flow-Driven (EFD), based on the energy flow analysis of the suspension system, is proposed in this paper. The vehicle suspension (the shock absorber and the spring) has the ability of transferring energy between the vehicle chassis and tire. By utilizing this ability, EFD intrinsically switches SH and ADD from each other and synergically marries their advantages to achieve the best filtering performance in global frequency range. The superiority of EFD is evaluated in terms of non-linear Frequency Response (FR), shock test and real uneven road disturbance excitation. As a result of evaluation, EFD even outperforms MPC by providing better ride comfort, much better than SH and ADD. Simultaneously, its design and computation load is still on a par with SH or ADD, much lighter than MPC.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] Alleyne Andrew, 1994, ADV AUTOMOTIVE TECHN, V3.1, P94
  • [2] [Anonymous], THESIS GRENOBLE INP
  • [3] Camacho E.F., 2004, MODEL PREDICTIVE CON, V2
  • [4] Commercial magneto-rheological fluid devices
    Carlson, JD
    Catanzarite, DM
    StClair, KA
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MODERN PHYSICS B, 1996, 10 (23-24): : 2857 - 2865
  • [5] Hybrid model predictive control application towards optimal semi-active suspension
    Giorgetti, N
    Bemporad, A
    Tseng, HE
    Hrovat, D
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONTROL, 2006, 79 (05) : 521 - 533
  • [6] Guvenc Bilin Aksun, 2006, MECHATRONIC SYSTEMS, V4
  • [7] Modified skyhook control of semi-active suspensions: A new model, gain scheduling, and hardware-in-the-loop tuning
    Hong, KS
    Sohn, HC
    Hedrick, JK
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DYNAMIC SYSTEMS MEASUREMENT AND CONTROL-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2002, 124 (01): : 158 - 167
  • [8] AN APPROACH TOWARD THE OPTIMAL SEMI-ACTIVE SUSPENSION
    HROVAT, D
    MARGOLIS, DL
    HUBBARD, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DYNAMIC SYSTEMS MEASUREMENT AND CONTROL-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 1988, 110 (03): : 288 - 296
  • [9] VIBRATION CONTROL USING SEMIACTIVE FORCE GENERATORS
    KARNOPP, D
    CROSBY, MJ
    HARWOOD, RA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR INDUSTRY-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 1974, 96 (02): : 619 - 626
  • [10] A new semi-active suspension control strategy through LPV technique
    Poussot-Vassal, C.
    Sename, O.
    Dugard, L.
    Gaspar, P.
    Szabo, Z.
    Bokor, J.
    [J]. CONTROL ENGINEERING PRACTICE, 2008, 16 (12) : 1519 - 1534