共 50 条
Azathioprine is effective for oral involvement in Crohn's disease but not for orofacial granulomatosis alone
被引:11
作者:
Mentzer, A.
[1
,2
]
Goel, R.
[1
,2
]
Elliott, T.
[1
,2
]
Campbell, H.
[2
,3
]
Hullah, E.
[2
,4
]
Patel, P.
[1
,2
]
Challacombe, S.
[2
,4
]
Escudier, M.
[2
,4
]
Sanderson, J. D.
[1
,2
]
机构:
[1] Guys & St Thomas NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Gastroenterol, London, England
[2] Kings Coll London, London, England
[3] Guys & St Thomas NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Nutr, London, England
[4] Guys & St Thomas NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Oral Med & Pathol, London, England
关键词:
azathioprine;
Crohn's disease;
orofacial granulomatosis;
INFLAMMATORY-BOWEL-DISEASE;
6-MERCAPTOPURINE;
MANAGEMENT;
REMISSION;
THERAPY;
D O I:
10.1111/jop.12379
中图分类号:
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号:
1003 ;
摘要:
BackgroundThere have been no previous reports assessing the effectiveness of azathioprine (AZA) in the treatment of orofacial granulomatosis (OFG). This report is a review of patients receiving AZA for active OFG with or without concomitant gut Crohn's disease (CD) in a specialist tertiary referral centre. MethodsClinical response was defined by Global Physician Assessment at 4-, 12- and 24-month follow-up and a standardised oral disease activity score (ODAS). ResultsSixty of 215 patients seen with OFG in our clinic over a 12-year period were treated with AZA. Of these, 22 had concomitant CD. The proportion of patients responding to AZA with a diagnosis of CD/OFG vs. OFG only at 4, 12 and 24 months were 54% vs. 21% (P = 0.03), 59% vs. 21% (P = 0.003) and 41% vs. 24% (P = 0.16), respectively. A statistically significant difference was seen between starting and follow-up ODAS scores at 4 months in the CD/OFG group which was not observed in the OFG only group. Factors predicting a need for AZA included a diagnosis of intestinal CD, sulcal swelling, sulcal ulcers and upper lip involvement. The factor predicting response to treatment was a diagnosis of CD at 12 months of follow-up. No difference in the number of adverse effects was observed between the two groups of patients. ConclusionsAZA is significantly more effective in the treatment of oral disease with a concurrent diagnosis of CD rather than in the treatment of OFG alone.
引用
收藏
页码:312 / 318
页数:7
相关论文