Evaluation of the sustainability of contrasted pig farming systems: the procedure, the evaluated systems and the evaluation tools

被引:11
作者
Bonneau, M. [1 ]
de Greef, K. [2 ]
Brinkman, D. [3 ]
Cinar, M. U. [3 ]
Dourmad, J. Y. [1 ]
Edge, H. L. [4 ]
Fabrega, E. [5 ]
Gonzalez, J. [5 ]
Houwers, H. W. J. [2 ]
Hviid, M. [6 ]
Ilari-Antoine, E. [7 ]
Klauke, T. N. [3 ]
Phatsara, C. [3 ]
Rydhmer, L. [8 ]
van der Oever, B. [9 ]
Zimmer, C. [10 ]
Edwards, S. A.
机构
[1] INRA, UMR PEGASE 1348, F-35590 Hermitage, France
[2] Livestock Res, NL-8200 AB Lelystad, Netherlands
[3] Univ Bonn, Inst Anim Sci ITW, DE-53115 Bonn, Germany
[4] Newcastle Univ, Sch Agr, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 7RU, Tyne & Wear, England
[5] IRTA, ES-17121 Monells, Girona, Spain
[6] Danish Technol Inst, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark
[7] IFIP, Pole Econ, F-31500 Toulouse, France
[8] Swedish Univ Agr Sci SLU, Dept Anim Breeding & Genet, SE-75007 Uppsala, Sweden
[9] Nutreco R&D, Swine Res Ctr, NL-3818 KC Amersfoort, Netherlands
[10] Bauerl Erzeugergemeinschaft Schwabisch Hall, DE-74549 Schwabisch Hall, Germany
关键词
pig; farming system; sustainable; assessment; SAFETY; MEAT;
D O I
10.1017/S1751731114002110
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Although a few studies consider the sustainability of animal farming systems along the three classical main pillars (economy, environment and society), most studies on pig farming systems address only one of these pillars. The present paper is the introduction to a series of companion papers presenting the results of a study undertaken within the EU-supported project Q-PorkChains, aiming at building a comprehensive tool for the evaluation of pig farming systems, which is robust to accommodate the large variability of systems existing in Europe. The tool is mostly based on questions to farmers and comprises a total of 37 dimensions distributed along eight themes: Animal Welfare, Animal Health, Breeding Programmes, Environmental 5ustainability, Meat Safety, Market Conformity, Economy and Working Conditions. The paper describes the procedure that was used for building the tool, using it on 15 contrasted pig farming systems and analysing the results. The evaluated systems are briefly described and a short overview of the dimensions is provided. Detailed descriptions of the theme-wise tools and results, as well as the results of an integrated evaluation, are available in the companion papers.
引用
收藏
页码:2011 / 2015
页数:5
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2008, COUNCIL EUROPEAN UNI, V47, P5
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2004, MONG MIN SECT MAN FU, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2007, Council Regulation (EC) No 219/2007, On the establishment of a Joint Undertaking to develop the new generation European air Traffic management system (SESAR), DOI DOI 10.1017/CB09781107415324.004
[4]   Scenario-based environmental assessment of farming systems: the case of pig production in France [J].
Basset-Mens, C ;
van der Werf, HMG .
AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2005, 105 (1-2) :127-144
[5]  
Berns G, 1996, THESIS RHEINISCHE FR
[6]  
Bonneau M., 2011, Journal on Chain and Network Science, V11, P115, DOI 10.3920/JCNS2011.Qpork4
[7]   Evaluation of the sustainability of contrasted pig farming systems: integrated evaluation [J].
Bonneau, M. ;
Klauke, T. N. ;
Gonzalez, J. ;
Rydhmer, L. ;
Ilari-Antoine, E. ;
Dourmad, J. Y. ;
de Greef, K. ;
Houwers, H. W. J. ;
Cinar, M. U. ;
Fabrega, E. ;
Zimmer, C. ;
Hviid, M. ;
van der Oever, B. ;
Edwards, S. A. .
ANIMAL, 2014, 8 (12) :2058-2068
[8]   Socio-cultural sustainability of pig production: Citizen perceptions in the Netherlands and Denmark [J].
Boogaard, B. K. ;
Boekhorst, L. J. S. ;
Oosting, S. J. ;
Sorensen, J. T. .
LIVESTOCK SCIENCE, 2011, 140 (1-3) :189-200
[9]   Comparing environmental impacts for livestock products: A review of life cycle assessments [J].
de Vries, M. ;
de Boer, I. J. M. .
LIVESTOCK SCIENCE, 2010, 128 (1-3) :1-11
[10]   Opportunities for mitigating pathogen contamination during on-farm food production [J].
Doyle, Michael P. ;
Erickson, Marilyn C. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD MICROBIOLOGY, 2012, 152 (03) :54-74