Social value orientations and the strategic use of fairness in ultimatum bargaining

被引:132
作者
van Dijk, E
De Cremer, D
Handgraaf, MJJ
机构
[1] Leiden Univ, Dept Social Org Psychol, NL-2300 RB Leiden, Netherlands
[2] Maastricht Univ, Dept Expt Psychol, Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] Tilburg Univ, Dept Econ & Social Psychol, Tilburg, Netherlands
关键词
ultimatum bargaining; social utility; social values; fairness; self-interest; power;
D O I
10.1016/j.jesp.2004.03.002
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
One of the main issues in research on ultimatum bargaining is whether bargainers are motivated by self-interest or by a concern for fairness. It is difficult to distinguish between both motivations, because it may be in the own interest to make fair offers. In the current paper on ultimatum bargaining, it is investigated whether bargainers are truly motivated to be fair, or whether they merely strategically use fairness as a means to increase their own outcomes. The results of two experimental studies indicate that social value orientations play an important role: strategic use of fairness is mainly displayed by proselfs. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:697 / 707
页数:11
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]  
ADAMS JS, 1965, ADV EXP SOC PSYCHOL, V2, P267
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1983, EQUITY THEORY PSYCHO
[3]   THE MODERATOR MEDIATOR VARIABLE DISTINCTION IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL-RESEARCH - CONCEPTUAL, STRATEGIC, AND STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
BARON, RM ;
KENNY, DA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 51 (06) :1173-1182
[4]   WHEN SOCIAL OUTCOMES ARENT FAIR - THE EFFECT OF CAUSAL ATTRIBUTIONS ON PREFERENCES [J].
BLOUNT, S .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1995, 63 (02) :131-144
[5]   Deception and retribution in repeated ultimatum bargaining [J].
Boles, TL ;
Croson, RTA ;
Murnighan, JK .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 2000, 83 (02) :235-259
[6]  
BOLES TL, 1990, CONTEMPORARY ISSUES IN DECISION MAKING, P375
[7]   ULTIMATUMS, DICTATORS AND MANNERS [J].
CAMERER, C ;
THALER, RH .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 1995, 9 (02) :209-219
[8]   Information in ultimatum games: An experimental study [J].
Croson, RTA .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 1996, 30 (02) :197-212
[9]   Why prosocials exhibit greater cooperation than proselfs: The roles of social responsibility and reciprocity [J].
De Cremer, D ;
Van Lange, PAM .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 2001, 15 :S5-S18
[10]   Influence of social motives on integrative negotiation: A meta-analytic review and test of two theories [J].
De Dreu, CKW ;
Weingart, LR ;
Kwon, S .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 78 (05) :889-905