Ultra-low-field MRI for the detection of liquid explosives

被引:55
|
作者
Espy, M. [1 ]
Flynn, M. [1 ]
Gomez, J. [1 ]
Hanson, C. [1 ]
Kraus, R. [1 ]
Magnelind, P. [1 ]
Maskaly, K. [1 ]
Matlashov, A. [1 ]
Newman, S. [1 ]
Owens, T. [1 ]
Peters, M. [1 ]
Sandin, H. [1 ]
Savukov, I. [1 ]
Schultz, L. [1 ]
Urbaitis, A. [1 ]
Volegov, P. [1 ]
Zotev, V. [1 ]
机构
[1] Los Alamos Natl Lab, Appl Modern Phys Grp, Los Alamos, NM 87545 USA
关键词
NUCLEAR-QUADRUPOLE RESONANCE; QUANTUM INTERFERENCE DEVICE; MICROTESLA MAGNETIC-FIELDS; NMR; SPECTROMETER; RELAXOMETRY; MEG;
D O I
10.1088/0953-2048/23/3/034023
中图分类号
O59 [应用物理学];
学科分类号
摘要
Recently it has become both possible and practical to use magnetic resonance (MR) at magnetic fields in the range from mu T to mT, the so-called ultra-low-field (ULF) regime. SQUID (superconducting quantum interference device) sensor technology allows for ultra-sensitive detection while pulsed pre-polarizing fields greatly enhance the signal. The instrumentation allows for unprecedented flexibility in signal acquisition sequences and simplified MRI instrumentation. Here we present results for a new application of ULF MRI and relaxometry for the detection and characterization of liquids. We briefly describe the motivation and advantages of the ULF MR approach, and present recent results from a seven-channel ULF MRI/relaxometer system constructed to non-invasively inspect liquids at a security checkpoint for the presence of hazardous material. The instrument was deployed at the Albuquerque International Airport in December 2008, and results from that endeavor are also presented.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Ultra-Low-Field MRI and Spin-Lattice Relaxation Time of 1H in the Presence of Fe3O4 Magnetic Nano-Particles Detected With a High-TC DC-SQUID
    Wang, Ning
    Jin, Yirong
    Jiang, Fengying
    Zeng, Jianfeng
    Gao, Mingyuan
    Wu, Yulin
    Deng, Hui
    Zheng, Guolin
    Li, Jie
    Chen, Yingfei
    Tian, Ye
    Ren, Yufeng
    Chen, Genghua
    Zheng, Dongning
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON APPLIED SUPERCONDUCTIVITY, 2013, 23 (03)
  • [22] Numerical study of ultra-low field nuclear magnetic resonance relaxometry utilizing a single axis magnetometer for signal detection
    Vogel, Michael W.
    Vegh, Viktor
    Reutens, David C.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 40 (05)
  • [23] Ultra-Low Field MRI Food Inspection System Using HTS-SQUID with Flux Transformer
    Tanaka, Saburo
    Kawagoe, Satoshi
    Demachi, Kazuma
    Hatta, Junichi
    IEICE TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTRONICS, 2018, E101C (08): : 680 - 684
  • [24] Low-field MRI can be more sensitive than high-field MRI
    Coffey, Aaron M.
    Truong, Milton L.
    Chekmenev, Eduard Y.
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE, 2013, 237 : 169 - 174
  • [25] An evolution of low-field strength MRI
    Hennig, Juergen
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE MATERIALS IN PHYSICS BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2023, 36 (03) : 335 - 346
  • [26] Dedicated low-field MRI in mice
    Choquet, P.
    Breton, E.
    Goetz, C.
    Marin, C.
    Constantinesco, A.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2009, 54 (17) : 5287 - 5299
  • [27] Ultra-Low Field NMR of UF6 for 235U Detection and Characterization
    Magnelind, Per E.
    Matlashov, Andrei N.
    Volegov, Petr L.
    Espy, Michelle A.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON APPLIED SUPERCONDUCTIVITY, 2009, 19 (03) : 816 - 818
  • [28] Study of Cu-wound Flux transformer for High-Tc SQUID Ultra-Low Field MRI
    Tanaka, S.
    Murata, H.
    Imamura, K.
    Hatsukade, Y.
    11TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON APPLIED SUPERCONDUCTIVITY (EUCAS2013), PTS 1-4, 2014, 507
  • [29] Magnetoresistive Hybrid Sensors for Simultaneous Low-Field MRI and Biomagnetic Measurements
    Sergeeva-Chollet, Natalia
    Dyvorne, Hadrien
    Polovy, Hedwige
    Pannetier-Lecoeur, Myriam
    Fermon, Claude
    17TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIOMAGNETISM ADVANCES IN BIOMAGNETISM - BIOMAG2010, 2010, 28 : 70 - 73
  • [30] Development of a Low-Cost, Portable NQR Spectrometer for RDX Explosives Detection
    Otagaki, Yui
    Miyato, Yuji
    Barras, Jamie
    Sato-Akaba, Hideo
    Kosmas, Panagiotis
    IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL, 2021, 21 (05) : 6922 - 6929