Exploring full cervical dilatation caesarean sections-A retrospective cohort study

被引:26
|
作者
Corry, Edward M. A. [1 ]
Ramphul, Meenakshi [1 ]
Rowan, Ann M. [1 ]
Segurado, Ricardo [2 ]
Mahony, Rhona M. [3 ]
Keane, Declan R. [4 ]
机构
[1] Natl Matern Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Dublin, Ireland
[2] Univ Coll Dublin, Sch Publ Hlth Physiotherapy & Sport Sci, Dublin, Ireland
[3] Natl Matern Hosp, Dublin, Ireland
[4] Univ Coll Dublin, Natl Matern Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Dublin, Ireland
关键词
Caesarean section; Second stage; Full dilatation; Oxytocin; Operative vaginal delivery; OPERATIVE DELIVERY; INSTRUMENTAL DELIVERY; LABOR; 2ND-STAGE; MORBIDITY; MANAGEMENT; THEATER; TRENDS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.03.031
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background: The rate of caesarean sections at full cervical dilatation with their high risk of morbidity continues to rise mirroring the overall increase in caesarean section rates internationally. Objectives: The objectives of this study were to determine the rate of full dilatation caesarean section in a tertiary referral unit and evaluate key labour, maternal and fetal factors potentially linked to those deliveries. We also assessed maternal and fetal morbidity at full dilatation sections. Where possible, these were compared with successful operative vaginal deliveries carried out in theatre to determine key differences. Study design:Retrospective cohort study. We reviewed the rate of full dilatation caesarean section over a 10-year period. We analysed deliveries (caesarean sections or operative vaginal deliveries) in single cephalic pregnancies >= 34 weeks with contemporaneously collected data from our unit's electronic database for 2015. Results: The rate of full dilatation caesarean section increased by over a third in the ten-year period (56/6947 (0.80%) vs 92/7378 (1.24%), p=0.01). Of 84 full dilatation caesarean sections who met the inclusion criteria, 63 (75%) were nulliparous and the mean maternal age was 33 (+/- 5) years. Oxytocin was used in the second stage in less than half of second stage caesarean sections (22 out of a recorded 57, 38.6%). There were more fetal head malposition (occipito-posterior, or occipito-transverse) at full dilatation caesarean section compared to successful operative vaginal deliveries (41/46 (89.1%) vs 2/21 (9.5), p< 0.001). The rate of significant postpartum haemorrhage (defined as estimated blood loss >1000 ml) was similar in both full dilatation caesarean section and operative vaginal deliveries. There was no difference in the mean birthweight at full dilatation caesarean sections compared to operative vaginal delivery (3.88 kg (2.80-5.33 kg) vs 3.48 kg (1.53-4.40 kg)). There was no difference in neonatal morbidity. Conclusion. Fetal head malposition is associated with a higher risk of full dilatation caesarean section. Interestingly, maternal and fetal morbidity were similar between full dilatation caesarean sections and anticipated difficult operative vaginal deliveries carried out in theatre. The management of labour in terms of the decision to use oxytocin judiciously in hope of correcting inefficient uterine contractions and continuous labour ward training, particularly the diagnosis of malposition and its correction may be beneficial in reducing the rate of full dilation caesarean sections. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:188 / 191
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of Caesarean sections and instrumental deliveries at full cervical dilatation: a retrospective review
    Tan, Pei Shan
    Tan, Jarrod Kah Hwee
    Tan, Eng Loy
    Tan, Lay Kok
    SINGAPORE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2019, 60 (02) : 75 - 79
  • [2] Caesarean section at full cervical dilatation
    Davis, Georgina
    Fleming, Tina
    Ford, Keryn
    Mouawad, Marie Rose
    Ludlow, Joanne
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2015, 55 (06) : 565 - 571
  • [3] Rising rates of caesarean deliveries at full cervical dilatation: a concerning trend
    Unterscheider, J.
    McMenamin, M.
    Cullinane, F.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2011, 157 (02) : 141 - 144
  • [4] Maternal and perinatal morbidity after Caesarean delivery at full cervical dilatation
    Radha, Pandian
    Tagore, Shephali
    Rahman, Muhammad Fairuz Abdul
    Tee, John
    SINGAPORE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 53 (10) : 655 - 658
  • [5] Full Dilatation Caesarean Section and the Risk of Preterm Delivery in a Subsequent Pregnancy: A Historical Cohort Study
    Ewington, Lauren Jade
    Quenby, Siobhan
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2020, 9 (12) : 1 - 10
  • [6] Risk of preterm birth in the subsequent pregnancy following caesarean section at full cervical dilatation compared with mid-cavity instrumental delivery
    Wang, Mandy
    Kirby, Adrienne
    Gibbs, Emma
    Gidaszewski, Beata
    Khajehei, Marjan
    Chua, Seng C.
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2020, 60 (03) : 382 - 388
  • [7] Cervical Dilatation and Curettage in Elective Caesarean Section. A Retrospective Analysis
    Berlit, Sebastian
    Nickol, Jana
    Weiss, Christel
    Tuschy, Benjamin
    Mayer, Jade
    Suetterlin, Marc
    Kehl, Sven
    IN VIVO, 2013, 27 (05): : 661 - 665
  • [8] Evaluation of timings and outcomes in category-one caesarean sections: A retrospective cohort study
    Dunn, Clare Newton
    Zhang, Qianpian
    Sia, Josh Tjunrong
    Assamo, Ptyseley Nkouibert
    Tagore, Shephali
    Sng, Ban Leong
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2016, 60 (08) : 546 - 551
  • [9] Caesarean delivery at full cervical dilatation versus caesarean delivery in the first stage of labour: comparison of maternal and perinatal morbidity
    Dan Selo-Ojeme
    Sathevan Sathiyathasan
    Mustabshera Fayyaz
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2008, 278 : 245 - 249
  • [10] Caesarean delivery at full cervical dilatation versus caesarean delivery in the first stage of labour: comparison of maternal and perinatal morbidity
    Selo-Ojeme, Dan
    Sathiyathasan, Sathevan
    Fayyaz, Mustabshera
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2008, 278 (03) : 245 - 249