The energy, environment and economy impact of coal resource tax, renewable investment, and total factor productivity growth

被引:21
作者
Wen, Shiyan [1 ]
Jia, Zhijie [2 ]
机构
[1] Xian Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Econ, Xian 710100, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[2] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Econ & Finance, Xian 710049, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
关键词
Coal resource tax; Renewable investment; Energy; Environmental; And economic impact; China; CEEEA; CGE model; Dynamic recursive computable general; equilibrium model; CARBON-DIOXIDE EMISSIONS; PORTER HYPOTHESIS; EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE; CO2; EMISSIONS; POWER-PLANTS; CHINA; CONSUMPTION; INNOVATION; REDUCTION; POLICY;
D O I
10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102742
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
China is the biggest emitter in the world, and coal is dominant in China's energy structure. At present, China has used many strategies to reduce coal use, but their cost-effectiveness is controversial. This paper applies the China-Energy-Environment-Economy Analysis (CEEEA) model, a dynamic recursive computable general equilibrium model with multi-sectors and multi-residents, to simulate progressive policy mix to reduce coal consumption and CO2 emission during 2020-2030, and presents the impact on energy, environment, and economy. The results show that the coal resource tax and the renewable investment can significantly reduce coal share and CO2 emissions to different degrees. The producer price index increases a lot in coal-related industries. However, the consumer price index only increases by no more than 1%. After all, energy products account for a small proportion of the supply chain of bulk commodities. Another, this paper tests the boundary of Porter Hypothesis of such policy mix: it only requires an additional 0.09% increase of total factor productivity every year to cover the negative economic impact of the taxes.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 71 条
  • [11] Testing the Porter hypothesis: the effects of environmental investments on efficiency in Swedish industry
    Broberg, Thomas
    Marklund, Per-Olov
    Samakovlis, Eva
    Hammar, Henrik
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS, 2013, 40 (01) : 43 - 56
  • [12] Are all jobs created equal? Regional employment impacts of a US carbon tax
    Brown, Marilyn A.
    Li, Yufei
    Soni, Anmol
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2020, 262
  • [13] Air quality and health co-benefits of China's national emission trading system
    Chang, Shiyan
    Yang, Xi
    Zheng, Haotian
    Wang, Shuxiao
    Zhang, Xiliang
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2020, 261
  • [14] Potential impacts of coal substitution policy on regional air pollutants and carbon emission reductions for China's building sector during the 13th Five-Year Plan period
    Chen, Han
    Chen, Wenying
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2019, 131 (281-294) : 281 - 294
  • [15] Chen JD, 2018, TRANSFORM BUS ECON, V17, P112
  • [16] Interregional differences of coal carbon dioxide emissions in China
    Chen, Jiandong
    Cheng, Shulei
    Song, Malin
    Wang, Jia
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2016, 96 : 1 - 13
  • [17] Renewable energy investment and carbon emissions under cap-and-trade mechanisms
    Chen, Wei
    Chen, Jing
    Ma, Yongkai
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 278
  • [18] Potential output gap in China's regional coal-fired power sector under the constraint of carbon emission reduction
    Chen, Zhenling
    Zhao, Weigang
    Zheng, Heyun
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2021, 148
  • [19] Replacing coal-fired power plants by photovoltaics in the Portuguese electricity system
    Figueiredo, Raquel
    Nunes, Pedro
    Meireles, Monica
    Madaleno, Mara
    Brito, Miguel C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 222 : 129 - 142
  • [20] Fujimori S., 2012, DISCUSSION PAPER SER